Channing Division of Network Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Computational Neuroscience Outcomes Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Cancer. 2019 Oct 1;125(19):3390-3400. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32328. Epub 2019 Jun 17.
Multiple studies have reported higher rates of glioma in areas with higher socioeconomic status (SES) but to the authors' knowledge have not stratified by other factors, including race/ethnicity or urban versus rural location.
The authors identified the average annual age-adjusted incidence rates and calculated hazard ratios for death for gliomas of various subtypes, stratified by a county-level index for SES, race/ethnicity, US region, and rural versus urban status.
Rates of glioma were highest in counties with higher SES (rate ratio, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.15-1.22 comparing the highest with the lowest quintiles [P < .001]). Stratified by race/ethnicity, higher rates in high SES counties persisted for white non-Hispanic individuals. Stratified by rural versus urban status, differences in incidence by SES were more pronounced among urban counties. Survival was higher for residents of high SES counties after adjustment for age and extent of surgical resection (hazard ratio, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.76-0.87 comparing the highest with the lowest quintile of SES [P < .001]). Survival was higher among white Hispanic, black, and Asian/Pacific Islander individuals compared with white non-Hispanic individuals, after adjustment for age, SES, and extent of surgical resection, and when restricted to those individuals with glioblastoma who received radiation and chemotherapy.
The incidence of glioma was higher in US counties of high compared with low SES. These differences were most pronounced among white non-Hispanic individuals and white Hispanic individuals residing in urban areas. Better survival was observed in high SES counties, even when adjusting for extent of surgical resection, and when restricted to those who received radiation and chemotherapy for glioblastoma. Differences in incidence and survival were associated with SES and race, rather than rural versus urban status.
多项研究报告称,社会经济地位(SES)较高的地区胶质母细胞瘤发病率较高,但据作者所知,这些研究并未按其他因素分层,包括种族/民族或城市与农村位置。
作者确定了各种亚型胶质母细胞瘤的平均年度年龄调整发病率,并计算了死亡率的风险比,按 SES、种族/民族、美国地区以及城乡状况的县级指数进行分层。
SES 较高的县胶质母细胞瘤发病率最高(率比,1.18;95%CI,1.15-1.22,比较最高五分位数与最低五分位数[P<0.001])。按种族/民族分层,在 SES 较高的县中,白人非西班牙裔个体的发病率更高。按城乡状况分层,城乡 SES 差异对发病率的影响在城市县更为明显。在调整年龄和手术切除范围后,SES 较高的县的居民生存率更高(风险比,0.82;95%CI,0.76-0.87,比较 SES 的最高五分位数与最低五分位数[P<0.001])。在调整年龄、SES 和手术切除范围后,与白人非西班牙裔个体相比,白西班牙裔、黑人和亚洲/太平洋岛民个体的生存率更高,并且当限制在接受放疗和化疗的胶质母细胞瘤患者中时,生存率更高。
美国 SES 较高的县胶质母细胞瘤发病率高于 SES 较低的县。这些差异在白种非西班牙裔个体和居住在城市地区的白西班牙裔个体中最为明显。即使在调整手术切除范围后,SES 较高的县的生存率也更高,并且当限制在接受放疗和化疗的胶质母细胞瘤患者中时,生存率更高。发病率和生存率的差异与 SES 和种族有关,而与城乡状况无关。