• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心脏康复随访中的康复后期护理“新信条”

[Rehab Aftercare 'New Credo' in the Cardiac Follow-Up Rehabilitation].

作者信息

Deck Ruth, Beitz Sebastian, Baumbach Christian, Brunner Susanne, Hoberg Eike, Knoglinger Ernst

机构信息

Institut für Sozialmedizin und Epidemiologie, Universität zu Lübeck.

Herz- und Gefäßzentrum Bad Bevensen.

出版信息

Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2020 Feb;59(1):17-25. doi: 10.1055/a-0899-1444. Epub 2019 Jun 17.

DOI:10.1055/a-0899-1444
PMID:31207652
Abstract

PURPOSE

Physical inactivity is considered the most important modifiable risk factor of cardio-vascular diseases. Therefore medical rehabilitation is focused on the improvement of physical activity. To maintain physical activity after rehabilitation aftercare strategies are necessary which help to transfer the skills learned during rehabilitation into daily routine. In this study the aftercare concept "Neues Credo" which has been evaluated several times has been implemented and evaluated into cardiological follow-up rehabilitation.

METHODS

Prospective, controlled, multicentre study with 4 cardiological rehabilitation institutions.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

rehabilitants with initial diagnosis from the ICD groups I20-25 and I34-43. In the first phase of the study, patients received standard rehabilitation and standard aftercare (control group (KG)). In the second phase, patients received rehabilitation based on the conditions of "Neues Credo" with the focus on increasing physical activity (intervention group (IG)). Data for evaluation were collected by paper-and-pencil questionnaires at 3 points in time. Primary outcome variable: restriction in participation (IMET); secondary outcome variables: depression (CES-D), several scales of subjective health and physical activity. Analysis of variance with repeated measures was used for the evaluation of long-term effects.

RESULTS

Complete data could be evaluated from 152 patients of the IG and from 165 patients of the KG. At the end of rehabilitation both IG and KG showed improvements in outcome variables. In the period after rehabilitation patients in the IG improved their physical activity significantly more often than members of the KG (66 vs. 42%, p<0,01), they showed more physical activity than the KG (p=0,040) and they performed endurance sports more often (58 vs. 38%, p<0,01). The primary outcome of participation shows significant improvements in both groups (p<0,01) 12 months after the rehabilitation, difference between groups did not reach statistical significance but indicated a clear tendency in favour of the IG. Similar trends could be found for the secondary outcome-data CONCLUSION: In this study, the "Neues Credo" was applied and evaluated in cardiologic rehabilitation for the first time. Participants reported high practicability and high satisfaction. Health- related outcomes show a trend of positive effects in favour of the IG, but the interaction effects did not reach statistical significance in most cases. Regarding physical activity the intervention group shows clear advantage and will probably benefit from the long-term effects of regular endurance training.

摘要

目的

身体活动不足被认为是心血管疾病最重要的可改变风险因素。因此,医学康复的重点是提高身体活动水平。为了在康复后维持身体活动,需要有后续照护策略,以帮助将康复期间学到的技能转化为日常生活。在本研究中,已多次评估的“新信条”后续照护概念已在心脏病学随访康复中实施并进行评估。

方法

在4个心脏病康复机构进行前瞻性、对照、多中心研究。

纳入标准

国际疾病分类(ICD)I20 - 25组和I34 - 43组的初诊康复患者。在研究的第一阶段,患者接受标准康复和标准后续照护(对照组(KG))。在第二阶段,患者接受基于“新信条”条件的康复,重点是增加身体活动(干预组(IG))。通过纸质问卷在3个时间点收集评估数据。主要结局变量:参与受限(IMET);次要结局变量:抑郁(CES - D)、主观健康和身体活动的几个量表。采用重复测量方差分析评估长期效果。

结果

可对干预组的152名患者和对照组的165名患者的完整数据进行评估。康复结束时,干预组和对照组的结局变量均有所改善。在康复后的时期,干预组患者身体活动改善的频率显著高于对照组(66%对42%,p < 0.01),他们的身体活动比对照组更多(p = 0.040),并且进行耐力运动的频率更高(58%对38%,p < 0.01)。康复12个月后,两组的主要参与结局均有显著改善(p < 0.01),组间差异未达到统计学意义,但显示出明显有利于干预组的趋势。次要结局数据也发现了类似趋势。

结论

在本研究中,“新信条”首次在心脏病康复中应用并进行评估。参与者报告其具有很高的实用性和满意度。与健康相关的结局显示出有利于干预组的积极影响趋势,但在大多数情况下,交互作用效应未达到统计学意义。在身体活动方面,干预组显示出明显优势,可能会从定期耐力训练的长期效果中受益。

相似文献

1
[Rehab Aftercare 'New Credo' in the Cardiac Follow-Up Rehabilitation].心脏康复随访中的康复后期护理“新信条”
Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2020 Feb;59(1):17-25. doi: 10.1055/a-0899-1444. Epub 2019 Jun 17.
2
[Supported own initiative of rehabilitation patients ("new credo") - a successful model?].[支持康复患者的自主倡议(“新信条”)——一个成功的模式?]
Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2012 Oct;51(5):316-25. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1291279. Epub 2012 Apr 2.
3
[Effects of Supported Aftercare in the Post-Rehabilitation Phase in COPD Patients: A Controlled Study].[支持性后续护理在慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者康复后阶段的效果:一项对照研究]
Pneumologie. 2021 Dec;75(12):929-941. doi: 10.1055/a-1507-9057. Epub 2021 Jun 25.
4
[Different Health Impairments at the Beginning of Medical Rehab: Possibilities of more Flexibility using the Example of Rehab Aftercare].[医学康复初期的不同健康损伤:以康复后续护理为例探讨提高灵活性的可能性]
Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2015 Aug;54(4):226-32. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1394447. Epub 2015 Feb 24.
5
[Supported aftercare into psychosomatic rehabilitation - transfer of "new credo"].支持性后续护理融入身心康复——“新信条”的转变
Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2014 Oct;53(5):305-12. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1384594. Epub 2014 Sep 4.
6
[Supported own initiative of rehabilitation patients ("new credo") - longterm effects of the nonrandomized trial].[支持康复患者的自主倡议(“新信条”)——非随机试验的长期效果]
Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2014 Oct;53(5):297-304. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1358388. Epub 2014 Jan 7.
7
[General Practitioner Centered Rehabilitation Aftercare for Chronic Back Pain].[以全科医生为中心的慢性背痛康复后续护理]
Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2021 Jun;60(3):195-203. doi: 10.1055/a-1286-2595. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
8
Telephone-based aftercare groups for family carers of people with dementia: study protocol of the Talking Time - REHAB project.针对痴呆症患者家庭护理人员的电话随访护理小组:“畅聊时光 - 康复”项目研究方案
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Mar 21;19(1):183. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4003-7.
9
[Reha Aftercare--One Size Fits All? Analyses of Rehab Patients which do not Benefit from Reha Aftercare].[康复后护理——一刀切可行吗?对未从康复后护理中获益的康复患者的分析]
Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2015 Aug;54(4):218-25. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1384599. Epub 2015 Feb 23.
10
ReNaApp: increasing the long-term effects of oncological rehabilitation through an application after medical rehabilitation (ReNaApp): a quasi-randomized longitudinal study of prospective design.ReNaApp:通过医学康复后的应用程序增强肿瘤康复的长期效果(ReNaApp):一项前瞻性设计的半随机纵向研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 May 6;20(1):378. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05248-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical Status of Cardiac Rehabilitation Manners and Models.心脏康复方式与模式的临床现状
Cardiol Res Pract. 2022 Jun 27;2022:9554984. doi: 10.1155/2022/9554984. eCollection 2022.
2
Health coaching for promoting physical activity in low back pain patients: a secondary analysis on the usage and acceptance.健康指导对促进腰痛患者身体活动的作用:关于使用情况和接受度的二次分析
BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2020 Feb 3;12:2. doi: 10.1186/s13102-019-0154-4. eCollection 2020.
3
The Beneficial Effects of Cardiac Rehabilitation.心脏康复的有益效果。
Cardiol Ther. 2020 Jun;9(1):35-44. doi: 10.1007/s40119-020-00164-9. Epub 2020 Jan 29.