Suppr超能文献

利用受众细分理解澳大利亚非参与侵袭性哺乳动物管理的原因。

Using Audience Segmentation to Understand Nonparticipation in Invasive Mammal Management in Australia.

机构信息

School of Psychology, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, 2351, Australia.

出版信息

Environ Manage. 2019 Aug;64(2):213-229. doi: 10.1007/s00267-019-01176-5. Epub 2019 Jun 17.

Abstract

Invasive mammals threaten agriculture, biodiversity, and community health. Yet many landholders fail to engage in control activities recommended by experts. We surveyed a representative sample of 731 Western Australian rural landholders. The survey assessed landholders' participation in a range of activities to control invasive mammals, as well as their capabilities, opportunities, and motivation for engaging in such activities. We found that over half of our respondents had not participated in any individual or group activities to control invasive mammals during the previous 12 months. Using latent profile analysis, we identified six homogeneous subgroups of nonparticipating landholders, each with their distinct psycho-graphic profiles: Unaware, Unskilled, and Unmotivated, Aware but Unskilled and Doubtful, Unskilled and Time Poor, Disinterested, Skilled but Dismissive, and Capable but Unmotivated. Our results indicate that engagement specialists should not treat nonparticipating landholders as a single homogeneous group. Nonparticipators differ considerably in terms of their capabilities, opportunities, and motivations, and require targeted engagement strategies informed by these differences.

摘要

入侵哺乳动物威胁着农业、生物多样性和社区健康。然而,许多土地所有者未能参与专家建议的控制活动。我们调查了西澳大利亚州 731 名农村土地所有者的代表性样本。该调查评估了土地所有者参与一系列控制入侵哺乳动物活动的情况,以及他们参与此类活动的能力、机会和动机。我们发现,超过一半的受访者在过去 12 个月内没有参与任何个人或团体活动来控制入侵哺乳动物。通过潜在剖面分析,我们确定了六个不参与的土地所有者同质亚组,每个亚组都有其独特的心理特征:无知、无技能和缺乏动力,有意识但无技能和怀疑,无技能和时间紧迫,不感兴趣,有技能但不屑一顾,有能力但缺乏动力。我们的研究结果表明,参与专家不应该将不参与的土地所有者视为一个单一的同质群体。不参与者在能力、机会和动机方面存在很大差异,需要根据这些差异制定有针对性的参与策略。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验