Department of Family Sciences, University of Kentucky, 160 Funkhouser Drive, Lexington, KY 40506, USA.
Behavioral Medicine and Clinical Psychology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital, 3333 Burnett Avenue, Cincinnati, OH 45229-3026, USA.
J Sch Psychol. 2019 Jun;74:106-125. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2019.05.003. Epub 2019 Jun 8.
Previous research has documented ethnic/racial disparities in the implementation of school discipline, including exclusionary practices. The current study focused on ethnic/racial disparities in four types of school exclusionary policies through the Civil Rights Data Collection (2013-2014) based on 15,901 middle and 18,303 high schools from the United States. Consistent with an ecological model of multi-contextual influences, school- and region-level characteristics were tested in a multi-level analytic model. Sex, disability status, and ethnicity/race were estimated at level 1, with the following school-level predictors at level 2: proportion of youth eligible for free or reduced lunch, school size, diversity (percentage of students of different ethnicities/races in school), urban/suburban/rural locale, and region (Northeast, Midwest, South, and West). Findings provided robust evidence of persistent discrepancies in disciplinary practices across ethnic/racial groups. Specifically, African American students and students self-identifying as two or more races were found to be at greater risk for school discipline actions across all disciplinary measures in both middle and high schools. Regarding school-level variables, students from lower SES schools and smaller schools were at greater risk for some disciplinary measures. Unexpected findings were found for regional differences, as Midwestern schools had significantly higher rates for most disciplinary measures as compared to Southern schools. Moreover, ethnic/racial discrepancies were moderated by school-level characteristics, such that African American students and students self-identifying with two or more races were more likely to be disciplined at low SES schools and at schools with greater diversity.
先前的研究记录了在实施学校纪律方面存在的族裔/种族差异,包括排斥性做法。本研究通过美国的民权数据收集(2013-2014 年),聚焦于四种类型的学校排斥性政策中的族裔/种族差异,该研究涉及 15901 所中学和 18303 所高中。根据多背景影响的生态模式,在多层次分析模型中检验了学校和地区层面的特征。性别、残疾状况和族裔/种族在一级进行估计,以下学校层面的预测因子在二级进行估计:享受免费或减价午餐的青年比例、学校规模、多样性(学校中不同族裔/种族学生的比例)、城乡/郊区/农村位置和地区(东北部、中西部、南部和西部)。研究结果提供了关于纪律实践在族裔/种族群体之间持续存在差异的有力证据。具体而言,在中学和高中的所有纪律措施中,非裔美国学生和自我认同为两种或多种族裔的学生被发现面临更大的纪律处分风险。关于学校层面的变量,来自社会经济地位较低的学校和规模较小的学校的学生面临一些纪律措施的风险更高。对于地区差异,出现了意想不到的发现,与南部学校相比,中西部学校的大多数纪律措施的比率明显更高。此外,族裔/种族差异受到学校层面特征的调节,例如,非裔美国学生和自我认同为两种或多种族裔的学生在社会经济地位较低的学校和多样性较大的学校更有可能受到纪律处分。