Clausson Carolina, Schroeder Cristiano Clausson, Goloni Paulo Vicenti, Farias Flavio Artur Rego, Passos Leandro, Zanetti Raquel Virgínia
Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Dental School and Institute and Research Center São Leopoldo Mandic, Rua Doutor José Rocha Junqueira 13, Campinas, São Paulo 13045-755, Brazil.
Department of Implant Dentistry, Dental School and Institute and Research Center São Leopoldo Mandic, Rua Doutor José Rocha Junqueira 13, Campinas, São Paulo 13045-755, Brazil.
Int J Biomater. 2019 May 12;2019:2475297. doi: 10.1155/2019/2475297. eCollection 2019.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the fracture resistance of 2 different types of all-ceramic crown using immediate dentin sealing (IDS), obtained using a CAD/CAM system on molars with different preparations. Forty extracted lower molars were endodontically treated and divided into four groups (n = 10) according to the dental preparation. Group 1 (SP0) was prepared without filling the pulp chamber and crown-root junction was located at the cementoenamel junction (CEJ). Group 2 (SP1) was prepared without filling the pulp chamber and crown-root junction was located 1-mm above the CEJ. Groups 3 and 4 contained a flat preparation surface with no axial wall height. Group 3 (CP0) was made IDS with complete filling of the pulp chamber with composite resin and crown-root junction was located at the CEJ. Group 4 (CP1) was prepared with complete filling of the pulp chamber and crown-root junction was located 1-mm above the CEJ. All groups were restored with CAD/CAM lithium disilicate ceramic crowns. Specimens were subjected to the fracture test and statistically analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA). Fracture mode was determined using a stereoscopic microscope, classified as repairable or nonrepairable, and analyzed using Fischer's exact test. Results indicated that there were no significant differences between the groups in terms of fracture resistance or fracture pattern (p >0.05). Fracture resistance was the lowest in the SP0 group, followed by the SP1 group (1634.38 N) of CP0 (1821.50 N), and it was the highest in the CP1 group. There was a predominance of nonrepairable fractures and there were no significant differences in the fracture resistance and fracture mode of CAD/CAM lithium disilicate molar all-ceramic crowns. Endodontically treated molars teeth might be restored with endocrowns or all-ceramic crowns on flat preparation; however tooth fracture failures that affect reliability of these types of restorations should be considered.
本研究的目的是评估使用即刻牙本质封闭(IDS)的两种不同类型全瓷冠的抗折性,这些全瓷冠是通过CAD/CAM系统在不同预备方式的磨牙上获得的。40颗拔除的下颌磨牙经过根管治疗,并根据牙体预备情况分为四组(n = 10)。第1组(SP0)的预备方式是不填充髓腔,冠根交界处位于牙釉质牙骨质界(CEJ)。第2组(SP1)的预备方式同样是不填充髓腔,但冠根交界处位于CEJ上方1毫米处。第3组和第4组有一个没有轴向壁高度的平坦预备表面。第3组(CP0)进行即刻牙本质封闭,并用复合树脂完全填充髓腔,冠根交界处位于CEJ。第4组(CP1)的预备方式是完全填充髓腔,冠根交界处位于CEJ上方1毫米处。所有组均用CAD/CAM二硅酸锂陶瓷冠修复。对标本进行抗折试验,并使用方差分析(ANOVA)进行统计分析。使用立体显微镜确定折裂模式,分为可修复或不可修复,并使用Fisher精确检验进行分析。结果表明,各组之间在抗折性或折裂模式方面没有显著差异(p > 0.05)。抗折性在SP0组中最低,其次是SP1组(1634.38 N)、CP0组(1821.50 N),在CP1组中最高。不可修复性折裂占主导,CAD/CAM二硅酸锂磨牙全瓷冠的抗折性和折裂模式没有显著差异。根管治疗后的磨牙可以在平坦预备的情况下用髓内冠或全瓷冠修复;然而,应考虑影响这些类型修复体可靠性的牙齿折裂失败情况。