AEGD-1, 2nd Dental Squadron, Barksdale Air Force Base, LA.
USAF Postgraduate Dental School, Keesler Air Force Base, MS.
J Prosthodont. 2019 Jan;28(1):e237-e242. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12671. Epub 2017 Oct 6.
To evaluate the effect of preparation ferrule inclusion with fracture resistance of mandibular molar endocrowns.
Recently extracted mandibular third molars were randomly divided into 3 groups (n = 12) with the coronal tooth structure removed perpendicular to the root long axis approximately 2 mm above the cemento-enamel junction with a slow-speed diamond saw. The pulp chamber was exposed using a diamond bur in a high-speed handpiece with pulpal remnants removed and canals instrumented using endodontic hand instruments. The chamber floor was restored using a resin core material with a two-step, self-etch adhesive and photopolymerized with a visible light-curing unit to create a 2 mm endocrown preparation pulp chamber extension. One and two millimeter ferrule height groups were prepared using a diamond bur in a high-speed handpiece following CAD/CAM guidelines. Completed preparation surface area was determined using a digital measuring microscope. Scanned preparations were restored with lithium disilicate restorations with a self-adhesive resin luting agent. All manufacturer recommendations were followed. Specimens were stored at 37°C/98% humidity and tested to failure after 24 hours at a 45° angle to the tooth long axis using a universal testing machine. Failure load was converted to MPa using the available bonding surface area with mean data analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis/Dunn (p = 0.05).
Calculated failure stress found no difference in failure resistance among the three groups; however, failure load results identified that the endocrown preparations without ferrule had significantly lower fracture load resistance. Failure mode analysis identified that all preparations demonstrated a high number of catastrophic failures.
Under the conditions of this study, ferrule-containing endocrown preparations demonstrated significantly greater failure loads than standard endocrown restorations; however, calculated failure stress based on available surface area for adhesive bonding found no difference between the groups. Lower instances of catastrophic failure were observed with the endocrown preparations containing 1 mm of preparation ferrule design; however, regardless of the presence of ferrule, this study found that all endocrown restorations suffered a high proportion of catastrophic failures but at loads greater than reported under normal masticatory function.
评估制备带颈圈对内衬冠修复下颌磨牙抗折能力的影响。
最近拔出的下颌第三磨牙随机分为 3 组(n = 12),用慢速金钢石锯沿牙根长轴垂直于牙冠结构,距牙颈釉牙骨质界约 2mm 处将牙冠结构去除。用高速手机上的金刚砂钻暴露牙髓腔,去除残余牙髓并用根管手器械预备根管。用两步自酸蚀粘结剂和可见光能聚合的光固化仪修复牙腔底,形成 2mm 内衬冠预备牙腔扩展。按照 CAD/CAM 指南,用高速手机上的金刚砂钻制备 1mm 和 2mm 颈圈高度的试件。用数字测量显微镜确定完成的预备表面积。用自粘结树脂水门汀修复扫描制备体,遵循所有制造商的建议。所有试件在 37°C/98%湿度下储存 24 小时,然后以 45°角沿牙长轴方向在万能试验机上进行测试至破坏。将破坏负荷转换为 MPa,使用可用粘结表面积,用 Kruskal-Wallis/Dunn 分析(p = 0.05)。
计算的破坏应力表明,三组间的破坏阻力无差异;然而,破坏负荷结果表明,无颈圈的内衬冠修复体的抗折负荷阻力明显较低。破坏模式分析表明,所有的制备体均表现出较高比例的灾难性破坏。
在本研究条件下,含颈圈的内衬冠修复体的破坏负荷明显大于标准内衬冠修复体;然而,基于可用粘结表面积计算的破坏应力,各组间无差异。含 1mm 颈圈设计的内衬冠修复体灾难性破坏的发生率较低;然而,无论是否有颈圈,本研究发现所有的内衬冠修复体都有较高比例的灾难性破坏,但破坏负荷大于正常咀嚼功能下的报道。