Suppr超能文献

75 岁以上脓毒症患者 C 反应蛋白和 NT-proBNP 水平的预测价值:一项前瞻性观察研究。

Predictive value of C-reactive protein and NT-pro-BNP levels in sepsis patients older than 75 years: a prospective, observational study.

机构信息

Department of Geriatrics, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.

Shanghai Dongming Community Health Service Center, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Aging Clin Exp Res. 2020 Mar;32(3):389-397. doi: 10.1007/s40520-019-01244-0. Epub 2019 Jun 18.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Using biomarkers to predict mortality in patients with sepsis is important because these patients frequently have high mortality rates and unsatisfactory outcomes. The performance of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-pro-BNP) and C-reactive protein (CRP) to predict clinical outcomes in elderly sepsis patients is unimpressive. We aimed to assess the prognostic value of NT-pro-BNP, CRP and the combination of both in selected medical ICU sepsis patients more than 75 years old.

METHODS

In total, 245 consecutive patients were screened for eligibility and followed during their ICU stays. We collected the patients' baseline characteristics, including their Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) scores and NT-pro-BNP and CRP levels. The primary outcome was ICU mortality. Potential predictors were analyzed for their possible associations with the outcome. We also evaluated the ability of NT-pro-BNP and CRP levels combined with the APACHE II score to predict ICU mortality by calculating the C-index and net reclassification improvement (NRI).

RESULTS

Univariate regression revealed that CRP, NT-pro-BNP, APACHE II score, lactic acid level, NEU count(neutrophil count)and HCT level independently predicted ICU mortality (all P < 0.01). The C-index for the prediction of ICU mortality by the APACHE II score (0.847 ± 0.029; P < 0.001) was greater than that for NT-pro-BNP (0.673 ± 0.039; P < 0.01) or CRP (0.626 ± 0.039; P < 0.01) (all P < 0.01). Compared with the APACHE II score (0.847 ± 0.029; P < 0.001), the combination of CRP (0.849 ± 0.029; P < 0.01) or NT-pro-BNP (0.853 ± 0.028; P < 0.01) or both (0.853 ± 0.030; P < 0.01) with the APACHE II score did not significantly increase the C-index for predicting ICU mortality (all P > 0.05). However, the addition of NT-pro-BNP to the APACHE II score gave an NRI of 8.6% (P = 0.000), the addition of CRP to the APACHE II score provided an NRI of 11.34% (P = 0.012), and the addition of both markers to the APACHE II score yielded an NRI of 29.0% (P = 0.000). In the MOF subgroup (N = 118), CRP (OR = 2.62, P < 0.05) but not NT-pro-BNP (OR = 1.73, p > 0.05) independently predicted ICU mortality, and the addition of CRP to the APACHE II score obviously increased its predictive ability (NRI = 13.88%, P = 0.000). In the non-MOF group (N = 127), neither CRP (OR = 5.447, P = 0.078) nor NT-pro-BNP (OR = 2.239, P = 0.016) was an independent predictor of ICU mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

In sepsis patients older than 75 years, NT-pro-BNP and CRP can serve as independent predictors of mortality, and the addition of NT-pro-BNP or CRP or both to the APACHE II score significantly improves the ability to predict ICU mortality. CRP appears to be useful for predicting ICU outcomes in elderly sepsis patients with multiple-organ failure.

摘要

简介

使用生物标志物预测脓毒症患者的死亡率很重要,因为这些患者的死亡率通常很高,预后不佳。N 端脑利钠肽前体(NT-pro-BNP)和 C 反应蛋白(CRP)在预测老年脓毒症患者的临床结局方面表现不佳。我们旨在评估 NT-pro-BNP、CRP 及其组合在选择的 75 岁以上的 ICU 脓毒症患者中的预后价值。

方法

总共对 245 名连续患者进行了筛选,以确定其是否符合条件,并在 ICU 住院期间对其进行了随访。我们收集了患者的基线特征,包括急性生理学和慢性健康评估 II(APACHE II)评分以及 NT-pro-BNP 和 CRP 水平。主要结局是 ICU 死亡率。对潜在的预测因素进行了分析,以评估其与结局的可能相关性。我们还通过计算 C 指数和净重新分类改善(NRI)评估了 NT-pro-BNP 和 CRP 水平与 APACHE II 评分相结合预测 ICU 死亡率的能力。

结果

单因素回归显示,CRP、NT-pro-BNP、APACHE II 评分、乳酸水平、NEU 计数(中性粒细胞计数)和 HCT 水平均独立预测 ICU 死亡率(均 P<0.01)。APACHE II 评分预测 ICU 死亡率的 C 指数(0.847±0.029;P<0.001)大于 NT-pro-BNP(0.673±0.039;P<0.01)或 CRP(0.626±0.039;P<0.01)(均 P<0.01)。与 APACHE II 评分(0.847±0.029;P<0.001)相比,CRP(0.849±0.029;P<0.01)或 NT-pro-BNP(0.853±0.028;P<0.01)或两者(0.853±0.030;P<0.01)与 APACHE II 评分的组合并未显著提高预测 ICU 死亡率的 C 指数(均 P>0.05)。然而,将 NT-pro-BNP 添加到 APACHE II 评分中可提供 8.6%的 NRI(P=0.000),将 CRP 添加到 APACHE II 评分中可提供 11.34%的 NRI(P=0.012),将两个标志物添加到 APACHE II 评分中可提供 29.0%的 NRI(P=0.000)。在 MOF 亚组(N=118)中,CRP(OR=2.62,P<0.05)而不是 NT-pro-BNP(OR=1.73,P>0.05)独立预测 ICU 死亡率,并且 CRP 对 APACHE II 评分的添加明显提高了其预测能力(NRI=13.88%,P=0.000)。在非 MOF 组(N=127)中,CRP(OR=5.447,P=0.078)和 NT-pro-BNP(OR=2.239,P=0.016)均不是 ICU 死亡率的独立预测因素。

结论

在 75 岁以上的脓毒症患者中,NT-pro-BNP 和 CRP 可以作为死亡率的独立预测因素,将 NT-pro-BNP 或 CRP 或两者添加到 APACHE II 评分中可显著提高预测 ICU 死亡率的能力。CRP 似乎对预测老年脓毒症患者多器官功能衰竭的 ICU 结局有用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验