Suppr超能文献

一项评估预储存白细胞滤除对接受输血的危重病犬炎症标志物影响的试点研究。

A pilot study evaluating the effects of prestorage leukoreduction on markers of inflammation in critically ill dogs receiving a blood transfusion.

作者信息

Bosch Lozano Luis, Blois Shauna L, Wood R Darren, Abrams-Ogg Anthony C G, Bersenas Alexa M, Bateman Shane W, Richardson Danielle M

机构信息

Department of Clinical Studies, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada.

Department of Pathobiology, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio). 2019 Jul;29(4):385-390. doi: 10.1111/vec.12857. Epub 2019 Jun 20.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare markers of inflammation after transfusion of leukoreduced (LR) packed RBCs (pRBCs) versus non-LR pRBCs in dogs with critical illness requiring blood transfusion, and to report survival to discharge and rates of transfusion reactions in these dogs.

DESIGN

Prospective randomized blinded clinical study June 2014-September 2015.

SETTING

University veterinary teaching hospital.

ANIMALS

Twenty-three client-owned critically ill dogs, consecutively enrolled.

INTERVENTIONS

Dogs requiring a single pRBC transfusion were randomized into the LR or non-LR pRBC group. Exclusion criteria included: requirement for multiple blood products, history of previous blood transfusion, and administration of anti-inflammatory or immunosuppressive medication prior to enrollment.

MEASUREMENTS

Blood samples were obtained immediately prior to transfusion, then 2 and 24 hours following transfusion. Parameters measured at each time point included: PCV, WBC count, segmented and band neutrophil counts, fibrinogen, and plasma lactate and C-reactive protein concentrations. Acute patient physiologic and laboratory evaluation fast score was calculated on admission.

RESULTS

Eleven dogs were included in the LR group and 12 in the non-LR group; scores of illness severity were not significantly different between groups. Total WBC count was significantly higher in the non-LR versus LR group 24 hours following pRBC transfusion, but this difference was not evident 2 hours following transfusion. No other inflammatory parameters at any time point were significantly different between LR versus non-LR pRBC transfused dogs. Survival rates to discharge for LR and non-LR groups were 8/11 and 9/12, respectively. Acute transfusion reactions were identified in 1/11 and 2/12 dogs in the LR and non-LR group, respectively. All transfused blood was stored ≤12 days.

CONCLUSIONS

Most markers of inflammation did not significantly increase following transfusion of LR versus non-LR pRBCs stored ≤12 days in ill dogs. Further prospective, randomized trials are needed in clinically ill dogs to determine the benefit of prestorage leukoreduction.

摘要

目的

比较在需要输血的重症犬中,输注白细胞滤除(LR)的浓缩红细胞(pRBCs)与未进行白细胞滤除的pRBCs后炎症标志物的变化,并报告这些犬的出院生存率和输血反应发生率。

设计

2014年6月至2015年9月的前瞻性随机盲法临床研究。

地点

大学兽医教学医院。

动物

连续纳入23只客户拥有的重症犬。

干预措施

需要单次输注pRBCs的犬被随机分为LR或未进行白细胞滤除的pRBCs组。排除标准包括:需要多种血液制品、既往有输血史以及在入组前使用过抗炎或免疫抑制药物。

测量指标

在输血前、输血后2小时和24小时采集血样。每个时间点测量的参数包括:红细胞压积(PCV)、白细胞计数、分叶核和杆状核中性粒细胞计数、纤维蛋白原以及血浆乳酸和C反应蛋白浓度。入院时计算急性患者生理和实验室评估快速评分。

结果

LR组纳入11只犬,未进行白细胞滤除的组纳入12只犬;两组间疾病严重程度评分无显著差异。在输注pRBCs后24小时,未进行白细胞滤除的组总白细胞计数显著高于LR组,但输血后2小时这种差异不明显。在输注LR与未进行白细胞滤除的pRBCs的犬之间,任何时间点的其他炎症参数均无显著差异。LR组和未进行白细胞滤除的组出院生存率分别为8/11和9/12。LR组和未进行白细胞滤除的组分别有1/11和2/12的犬出现急性输血反应。所有输注的血液储存时间均≤12天。

结论

在患病犬中,输注储存时间≤12天的LR与未进行白细胞滤除的pRBCs后,大多数炎症标志物没有显著增加。需要在临床患病犬中进行进一步的前瞻性随机试验,以确定储存前白细胞滤除的益处。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验