Bosch Lozano Luis, Blois Shauna L, Wood R Darren, Abrams-Ogg Anthony C G, Bersenas Alexa M, Bateman Shane W, Richardson Danielle M
Department of Clinical Studies, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Department of Pathobiology, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio). 2019 Jul;29(4):385-390. doi: 10.1111/vec.12857. Epub 2019 Jun 20.
To compare markers of inflammation after transfusion of leukoreduced (LR) packed RBCs (pRBCs) versus non-LR pRBCs in dogs with critical illness requiring blood transfusion, and to report survival to discharge and rates of transfusion reactions in these dogs.
Prospective randomized blinded clinical study June 2014-September 2015.
University veterinary teaching hospital.
Twenty-three client-owned critically ill dogs, consecutively enrolled.
Dogs requiring a single pRBC transfusion were randomized into the LR or non-LR pRBC group. Exclusion criteria included: requirement for multiple blood products, history of previous blood transfusion, and administration of anti-inflammatory or immunosuppressive medication prior to enrollment.
Blood samples were obtained immediately prior to transfusion, then 2 and 24 hours following transfusion. Parameters measured at each time point included: PCV, WBC count, segmented and band neutrophil counts, fibrinogen, and plasma lactate and C-reactive protein concentrations. Acute patient physiologic and laboratory evaluation fast score was calculated on admission.
Eleven dogs were included in the LR group and 12 in the non-LR group; scores of illness severity were not significantly different between groups. Total WBC count was significantly higher in the non-LR versus LR group 24 hours following pRBC transfusion, but this difference was not evident 2 hours following transfusion. No other inflammatory parameters at any time point were significantly different between LR versus non-LR pRBC transfused dogs. Survival rates to discharge for LR and non-LR groups were 8/11 and 9/12, respectively. Acute transfusion reactions were identified in 1/11 and 2/12 dogs in the LR and non-LR group, respectively. All transfused blood was stored ≤12 days.
Most markers of inflammation did not significantly increase following transfusion of LR versus non-LR pRBCs stored ≤12 days in ill dogs. Further prospective, randomized trials are needed in clinically ill dogs to determine the benefit of prestorage leukoreduction.
比较在需要输血的重症犬中,输注白细胞滤除(LR)的浓缩红细胞(pRBCs)与未进行白细胞滤除的pRBCs后炎症标志物的变化,并报告这些犬的出院生存率和输血反应发生率。
2014年6月至2015年9月的前瞻性随机盲法临床研究。
大学兽医教学医院。
连续纳入23只客户拥有的重症犬。
需要单次输注pRBCs的犬被随机分为LR或未进行白细胞滤除的pRBCs组。排除标准包括:需要多种血液制品、既往有输血史以及在入组前使用过抗炎或免疫抑制药物。
在输血前、输血后2小时和24小时采集血样。每个时间点测量的参数包括:红细胞压积(PCV)、白细胞计数、分叶核和杆状核中性粒细胞计数、纤维蛋白原以及血浆乳酸和C反应蛋白浓度。入院时计算急性患者生理和实验室评估快速评分。
LR组纳入11只犬,未进行白细胞滤除的组纳入12只犬;两组间疾病严重程度评分无显著差异。在输注pRBCs后24小时,未进行白细胞滤除的组总白细胞计数显著高于LR组,但输血后2小时这种差异不明显。在输注LR与未进行白细胞滤除的pRBCs的犬之间,任何时间点的其他炎症参数均无显著差异。LR组和未进行白细胞滤除的组出院生存率分别为8/11和9/12。LR组和未进行白细胞滤除的组分别有1/11和2/12的犬出现急性输血反应。所有输注的血液储存时间均≤12天。
在患病犬中,输注储存时间≤12天的LR与未进行白细胞滤除的pRBCs后,大多数炎症标志物没有显著增加。需要在临床患病犬中进行进一步的前瞻性随机试验,以确定储存前白细胞滤除的益处。