Tindall B J
Leibniz-Institut DSMZ-Deutsche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen und Zellkulturen GmbH., Inhoffenstraße 7B, 38124 Braunschweig, Germany.
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2019 Aug;69(8):2621-2625. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.003529. Epub 2019 Jun 20.
The list that notifies names published in volume 68, part 1 of the International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology provides the information that a number of names of species in the genus Clavibacter that had previously been treated as names at the rank of subspecies were illegitimate because they contravene Rule 34a and Rule 50a of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes. Rule 34a deals with combinations at the same rank and this rule does not apply to names that involve a change in rank. Rule 34a, b and c all fall under the heading new combinations and that in the case of names at the rank of species and subspecies where a change in rank is made Rule 34c applies. Rule 50a applies to names at the rank of subspecies that are elevated to species, but it is unclear why these nomenclatural changes lead to illegitimate names. Fortunately the Code is explicit in stating the role of the Notification Lists is limited to allowing orthographic corrections to be made. It is necessary to publish an interpretation of the status of these names that is consistent with the current wording of the Code.
《国际系统与进化微生物学杂志》第68卷第1部分公布的通知列表提供了以下信息:棒形杆菌属中一些以前被视为亚种等级名称的物种名称是非法的,因为它们违反了《原核生物命名国际准则》第34a条和第50a条。第34a条涉及同一等级的组合,该规则不适用于涉及等级变化的名称。第34a、b和c条均属于新组合的范畴,对于物种和亚种等级的名称,若发生等级变化,则适用第34c条。第50a条适用于提升为物种等级的亚种名称,但尚不清楚这些命名变化为何会导致名称非法。幸运的是,该准则明确指出通知列表的作用仅限于允许进行正字法更正。有必要发布一份与该准则当前措辞一致的关于这些名称地位的解释。