Adade Samuel, Das Vallabh E
College of Optometry, University of Houston , Houston , TX.
Strabismus. 2019 Sep;27(3):172-181. doi: 10.1080/09273972.2019.1629465. Epub 2019 Jun 21.
The goal of this study was to compare vertical fusion capability at different orbital eye positions in normal nonhuman primates and attempt to use this information to isolate the extraocular muscles (EOMs) that mediate vertical vergence. Scleral search coils were used to record movements of both eyes as two normal nonhuman primates (M1, M2) performed a vertical vergence task at different horizontal eye positions. In a control experiment, M1 was also tested at different angles of horizontal vergence. To elicit vertical vergence, a 50° x 50° stimulus comprising a central fixation cross and random dots elsewhere was presented separately to each eye under dichoptic viewing conditions. Vertical disparity was introduced by slowly displacing the stimulus for one eye vertically. Vertical fusion amplitude (maximum disparity that the monkey was able to fuse) and vertical vergence (maximum difference in vertical position of the two eyes) were measured. Vertical fusion capability differed at different orbital eye positions. Monkey M1 had significantly smaller vertical fusion capabilities when the right eye (RE) was abducted than left eye (LE) while M2 had significantly smaller vertical fusion capabilities when the RE was adducted and LE abducted. M1 also showed greater vertical fusion capability for near gaze. M1 data suggested that the vertical recti mediated vertical vergence in the RE and the oblique muscles in the LE while M2 data suggested that the oblique muscles mediated vertical vergence in the RE and the vertical recti in the LE. The variable results within the same animal and across animals suggest that EOM involvement during vertical fusional vergence is idiosyncratic and likely a weighted combination of multiple cyclovertical muscles.
本研究的目的是比较正常非人灵长类动物在不同眼眶眼位时的垂直融合能力,并尝试利用这些信息分离出介导垂直聚散的眼外肌(EOM)。当两只正常非人灵长类动物(M1、M2)在不同水平眼位执行垂直聚散任务时,使用巩膜搜索线圈记录双眼的运动。在对照实验中,还对M1在不同水平聚散角度下进行了测试。为了诱发垂直聚散,在双眼分视条件下,分别向每只眼睛呈现一个由中央注视十字和其他位置的随机点组成的50°×50°刺激。通过缓慢垂直移动一只眼睛的刺激来引入垂直视差。测量垂直融合幅度(猴子能够融合的最大视差)和垂直聚散(双眼垂直位置的最大差异)。垂直融合能力在不同眼眶眼位时有所不同。当右眼(RE)外展时,猴子M1的垂直融合能力明显小于左眼(LE),而当RE内收且LE外展时,M2的垂直融合能力明显较小。M1在近注视时也表现出更大的垂直融合能力。M1的数据表明,右眼的垂直直肌介导垂直聚散,左眼的斜肌介导垂直聚散,而M2的数据表明,右眼的斜肌介导垂直聚散,左眼的垂直直肌介导垂直聚散。同一动物内和不同动物间的结果差异表明,在垂直融合性聚散过程中眼外肌的参与是特异的,可能是多个垂直旋转肌的加权组合。