Suppr超能文献

高级药学实践经验评分方案对住院医师匹配率的影响。

Effect of Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experience Grading Scheme on Residency Match Rates.

机构信息

University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, Maryland.

出版信息

Am J Pharm Educ. 2019 May;83(4):6735. doi: 10.5688/ajpe6735.

Abstract

To examine the effect of advanced pharmacy practice experience (APPE) grading schemes on residency match rates. A cross-sectional survey was administered to U.S. pharmacy schools and colleges to determine an APPE grading scheme. Post-graduate year 1 residency match data for the years 2013-2015 was obtained from the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists. Additional variables thought to affect residency match rates were collected from publicly available sources and prior research. Unadjusted and adjusted multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to compare 2013-2015 residency match rates between institutions using letter grading and those using pass/fail grading schemes. Potential confounders for incorporation into the adjusted model were identified by Chi-square or Fisher's exact test as appropriate. There were 110 of 126 schools that responded to the survey. Of these, 100 schools reported using either letter grading or pass/fail grading schemes in APPE courses and were included in the study. Unadjusted analysis revealed no difference in match rates between letter grading and pass/fail grading schemes over the aggregated time frame or in individual years. After adjusting for potential confounders, pass/fail grading was associated with higher match rates in the aggregate analysis and in 2013. However, no association was observed in 2014 or 2015. This study demonstrates that there is limited difference in residency match rates between schools using pass/fail or letter grading schemes in APPEs.

摘要

为了考察高级药学实践经验(APPE)评分方案对住院医师匹配率的影响。对美国药学学校和学院进行了横断面调查,以确定 APPE 评分方案。从美国卫生系统药剂师学会获得了 2013-2015 年的毕业后第 1 年住院医师匹配数据。从公开来源和先前的研究中收集了被认为会影响住院医师匹配率的其他变量。采用未调整和调整后的多变量逻辑回归分析,比较了使用字母等级和通过/失败等级系统的机构之间 2013-2015 年住院医师匹配率。通过适当的卡方或 Fisher 精确检验确定了适合纳入调整模型的潜在混杂因素。对调查做出回应的有 126 所学校中的 110 所。其中,有 100 所学校报告在 APPE 课程中使用字母等级或通过/失败等级系统,这些学校被纳入研究。未调整分析显示,在总时间框架或个别年份中,字母等级和通过/失败等级系统之间的匹配率没有差异。在调整了潜在混杂因素后,通过/失败等级与总体分析和 2013 年的匹配率较高相关。然而,在 2014 年或 2015 年没有观察到关联。本研究表明,在 APPE 中使用通过/失败或字母等级系统的学校之间,住院医师匹配率的差异有限。

相似文献

1
Effect of Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experience Grading Scheme on Residency Match Rates.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2019 May;83(4):6735. doi: 10.5688/ajpe6735.
2
Relationship between advanced pharmacy practice experience grading schemes and pharmacy residency match rates.
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2022 Dec 5;79(24):2261-2270. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/zxac254.
3
Pharmacy residency match rates and predictors.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2013 Dec 16;77(10):212. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7710212.
8
Characteristics of schools of pharmacy associated with a successful PGY1 residency match.
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2018 Sep;10(9):1205-1210. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2018.06.012. Epub 2018 Jun 29.
9
Impact of Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experiences on Residency Interview Invitations.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2020 Feb;84(2):7575. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7575.
10

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

2
Streamlining the process for initial review of pharmacy residency applications: an analytic approach.
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2013 Oct 1;70(19):1670-5. doi: 10.2146/ajhp120769.
3
Impact of pass/fail grading on medical students' well-being and academic outcomes.
Med Educ. 2011 Sep;45(9):867-77. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.03989.x.
4
Pass-fail grading: laying the foundation for self-regulated learning.
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2010 Oct;15(4):469-77. doi: 10.1007/s10459-009-9211-1. Epub 2009 Dec 12.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验