Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima University Graduate School, Tokushima, Japan.
Department of Radiology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima University Graduate School, Tokushima, Japan.
Acta Neurol Scand. 2019 Sep;140(3):229-235. doi: 10.1111/ane.13136. Epub 2019 Jun 21.
Neurological findings are important for the differential diagnosis of Parkinson's disease (PD), multiple system atrophy with predominant parkinsonian features (MSA-P), and progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP). There is currently no fast and reliable method to distinguish these patients.
To address this, we propose a novel approach to measure midbrain and pons size using a longitudinal "one line" method from the mid-sagittal view.
Structural images were acquired from 101 subjects who underwent 3.0 T MRI (20 controls, 44 PD, 20 MSA, 12 PSP, and 5 corticobasal syndrome). We measured the middle cerebellar peduncle (MCP), superior cerebellar peduncle (SCP), midbrain, and pons. Brainstem size was measured by area or length of the longitudinal axis, which we named the "one line" method. We conducted intraclass correlation coefficients to assess the extent of agreement and consistency among raters, and receiver operating characteristic curves were used to determine diagnostic accuracy.
Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) of MCP width were excellent in sagittal and axial sections while those of SCP width were moderate. There were also excellent ICCs between raters for "one line" method of the midbrain and pons, while areas showed good ICCs. "One line" method and area of the midbrain were better than SCP width for the differential diagnosis of PSP from MSA-P and PD. In contrast, there was no clearly superior measurement for differentially diagnosing MSA-P.
The "one line" method was comparable with area for inter-rater agreement and diagnostic accuracy even though this was a simple and fast way.
神经学发现对于帕金森病(PD)、以帕金森病为主的多系统萎缩(MSA-P)和进行性核上性麻痹(PSP)的鉴别诊断很重要。目前尚无快速可靠的方法来区分这些患者。
为此,我们提出了一种新的方法,使用从中矢状面看的纵向“一线”方法来测量中脑和脑桥的大小。
从 101 名接受 3.0T MRI 检查的受试者中获取结构图像(20 名对照,44 名 PD,20 名 MSA,12 名 PSP 和 5 名皮质基底节综合征)。我们测量了中间小脑脚(MCP)、上小脑脚(SCP)、中脑和脑桥。我们将脑桥大小的测量值命名为“一线”方法,通过面积或长轴的长度来测量。我们进行了组内相关系数评估,以评估评分者之间的一致性和一致性程度,并使用接收者操作特征曲线来确定诊断准确性。
MCP 宽度的组内相关系数(ICC)在矢状位和轴位均为优秀,而 SCP 宽度的 ICC 为中等。“一线”方法和中脑和脑桥的区域之间的 ICC 也很好,而中脑和脑桥的 ICC 也很好。“一线”方法和中脑区域优于 SCP 宽度,可用于鉴别 PSP 与 MSA-P 和 PD。相比之下,对于鉴别 MSA-P 并没有明显更好的测量方法。
尽管“一线”方法简单快捷,但与区域相比,它在评分者之间的一致性和诊断准确性方面具有可比性。