• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用自己的语言写作:一种减少学生科学写作中抄袭和常见写作问题的干预措施。

Writing in your own voice: An intervention that reduces plagiarism and common writing problems in students' scientific writing.

作者信息

Yang Anqi, Stockwell Sarah, McDonnell Lisa

机构信息

Division of Biological Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, 92093.

出版信息

Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2019 Sep;47(5):589-598. doi: 10.1002/bmb.21282. Epub 2019 Jun 21.

DOI:10.1002/bmb.21282
PMID:31225935
Abstract

In many of our courses, particularly laboratory courses, students are expected to engage in scientific writing. Despite various efforts by other courses and library resources, as instructors we are often faced with the frustration of student plagiarism and related writing problems. Here, we describe a simple Writing in Your Own Voice intervention designed to help students become more aware of different types of plagiarism and writing problems, avoid those problems, and practice writing in their own voice. In this article, we will introduce the types of plagiarism and writing problems commonly encountered in our molecular biology laboratory course, the intervention, and the results of our study. From the evaluation of 365 student reports, we found the intervention resulted in nearly 50% fewer instances of plagiarism and common writing problems. We also observed significantly fewer instances of severe plagiarism (e.g. several sentences copied from an external source). In addition, we find that the effects last for several weeks after the students complete the intervention assignment. This assignment is particularly easy to implement and can be a very useful tool for teaching students how to write in their own voices. © 2019 International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 47(5):589-598, 2019.

摘要

在我们的许多课程中,尤其是实验课程,都要求学生进行科学写作。尽管其他课程和图书馆资源都做出了各种努力,但作为教师,我们经常面临学生抄袭及相关写作问题带来的挫败感。在此,我们描述一种简单的“用自己的声音写作”干预措施,旨在帮助学生更清楚地认识不同类型的抄袭和写作问题,避免这些问题,并练习用自己的声音写作。在本文中,我们将介绍在我们的分子生物学实验课程中常见的抄袭和写作问题类型、干预措施以及我们的研究结果。通过对365份学生报告的评估,我们发现该干预措施使抄袭和常见写作问题的发生率减少了近50%。我们还观察到严重抄袭(如从外部来源抄袭几个句子)的情况明显减少。此外,我们发现这些效果在学生完成干预作业后的几周内仍然存在。这项作业特别易于实施,对于教导学生如何用自己的声音写作可能是一个非常有用的工具。© 2019国际生物化学与分子生物学联盟,47(5):589 - 598,2019。

相似文献

1
Writing in your own voice: An intervention that reduces plagiarism and common writing problems in students' scientific writing.用自己的语言写作:一种减少学生科学写作中抄袭和常见写作问题的干预措施。
Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2019 Sep;47(5):589-598. doi: 10.1002/bmb.21282. Epub 2019 Jun 21.
2
Plagiarism or not? investigation of Turnitin®-detected similarity hits in biology laboratory reports.是否存在抄袭行为?对Turnitin®检测出的生物学实验室报告相似度匹配结果的调查
Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2019 Jul;47(4):370-379. doi: 10.1002/bmb.21236. Epub 2019 Mar 28.
3
The annotated bibliography and citation behavior: enhancing student scholarship in an undergraduate biology course.带注释的参考文献目录与引用行为:提升本科生物学课程中学生的学术水平
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2007 Winter;6(4):350-60. doi: 10.1187/cbe.07-04-0022.
4
An Activity to Promote Recognition of Unintentional Plagiarism in Scientific Writing in Undergraduate Biology Courses.一项旨在促进本科生物学课程中科学写作中无意抄袭行为识别的活动。
J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2019 Aug 30;20(2). doi: 10.1128/jmbe.v20i2.1751. eCollection 2019.
5
Text-based plagiarism in scientific writing: what Chinese supervisors think about copying and how to reduce it in students' writing.科学写作中的文字剽窃:中国导师对抄袭的看法以及如何减少学生写作中的抄袭行为
Sci Eng Ethics. 2013 Jun;19(2):569-83. doi: 10.1007/s11948-011-9342-7. Epub 2012 Jan 3.
6
Biochemistry laboratory reports: Filling in the introduction and discussion.生物化学实验室报告:填写引言和讨论部分。
Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2018 Nov;46(6):619-622. doi: 10.1002/bmb.21179. Epub 2018 Nov 2.
7
A quarter-long exercise that introduces general education students to neurophysiology and scientific writing.一项为期四分之一学年的活动,向通识教育学生介绍神经生理学和科学写作。
Am J Physiol. 1997 Jun;272(6 Pt 3):S19-25. doi: 10.1152/advances.1997.272.6.S19.
8
Intentionally flawed manuscripts as means for teaching students to critically evaluate scientific papers.
Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2018 Jan;46(1):22-30. doi: 10.1002/bmb.21084. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
9
Problem-based learning in research method courses: development, application and evaluation.基于问题的学习在研究方法课程中的应用:发展、应用与评估。
F1000Res. 2023 Dec 11;11:378. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.75985.2. eCollection 2022.
10
Dyslexia, authorial identity, and approaches to learning and writing: a mixed methods study.诵读困难、作者身份认同以及学习和写作方法:一项混合方法研究。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2012 Jun;82(Pt 2):289-307. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.2011.02026.x. Epub 2011 Mar 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Digital health economics education: perspectives, potential and barriers at German medical universities.数字健康经济学教育:德国医科大学的观点、潜力与障碍
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Aug 1;12:1624347. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1624347. eCollection 2025.
2
Student definitions of ownership and perceived ways ownership influences writing in a biology laboratory class.学生对所有权的定义以及所有权在生物学实验室课程中影响写作的感知方式。
J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2024 Apr 25;25(1):e0019723. doi: 10.1128/jmbe.00197-23. Epub 2024 Mar 15.
3
Promoting Academic Integrity and Student Learning in Online Biology Courses.
在在线生物学课程中促进学术诚信与学生学习。
J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2021 Mar 31;22(1). doi: 10.1128/jmbe.v22i1.2291. eCollection 2021.