Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Division of Physical Therapy, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 30332, USA.
School of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, 30332, USA.
J Physiol. 2019 Sep;597(17):4627-4642. doi: 10.1113/JP277363. Epub 2019 Jul 8.
Golgi tendon organ feedback has been evaluated most frequently using electrical stimulation of peripheral nerves, which is not a physiological or selective stimulus for Golgi tendon organs. Golgi tendon organs are most responsive to active muscle contractions. This study provides evidence that muscle stimulation evoked twitches - a physiological stimulus for Golgi tendon organs - induces intermuscular effects most likely due to mechanical activation of Golgi tendon organ feedback and not direct activation of sensory axons. The results demonstrate that twitch contractions are a feasible non-invasive approach that can be used to advance understanding of the functional role of Golgi tendon organ feedback.
Force feedback from Golgi tendon organs (GTOs) has widespread intermuscular projections mediated by interneurons that share inputs from muscle spindles, among others. Because current methods to study GTO circuitry (nerve stimulation or muscle stretch) also activate muscle spindle afferents, the selective role of GTOs remains uncertain. Here, we tested the hypothesis that intramuscular stimulation evoked twitch contractions could be used to naturally bias activation of GTOs and thus evaluate their intermuscular effects in decerebrate cats. This was achieved by comparing the effects of twitch contractions and stretches as donor inputs onto the motor output of recipient muscles. Donor-recipient pairs evaluated included those already known in the cat to receive donor excitatory muscle spindle feedback only, inhibitory GTO feedback only, and both excitatory spindle and inhibitory GTO effects. Muscle stretch, but not twitch contractions, evoked excitation onto recipient muscles with muscle spindle afferent inputs only. Both donor muscle stretch and twitch contractions inhibited a recipient muscle with GTO projections only. In a recipient muscle that receives both muscle spindle and GTO projections, donor muscle stretch evoked both excitatory and inhibitory effects, whereas twitch contractions evoked inhibitory effects only. These data support the hypothesis that muscle stimulation evoked contractions can induce intermuscular effects most consistent with mechanical GTO receptor activation and not direct activation of sensory axons. We propose this approach can be used to evaluate GTO circuitry more selectively than muscle stretch or nerve stimulation and can be adapted to study GTO feedback non-invasively in freely moving cats and humans.
戈氏腱器官反馈最常通过外周神经的电刺激来评估,但这不是戈氏腱器官的生理或选择性刺激。戈氏腱器官对主动肌肉收缩最敏感。本研究提供的证据表明,肌肉刺激引起的抽搐——戈氏腱器官的生理刺激——会引起肌肉间的效应,这很可能是由于戈氏腱器官反馈的机械激活,而不是感觉轴突的直接激活。研究结果表明,抽搐收缩是一种可行的非侵入性方法,可以用来进一步了解戈氏腱器官反馈的功能作用。
来自戈氏腱器官(GTO)的力反馈具有广泛的肌肉间投射,由中间神经元介导,这些中间神经元与肌梭等共享输入。由于目前研究 GTO 回路的方法(神经刺激或肌肉拉伸)也会激活肌梭传入纤维,因此 GTO 的选择性作用仍不确定。在这里,我们测试了这样一个假设,即肌肉内刺激引起的抽搐收缩可以被用来自然地偏向 GTO 的激活,从而评估它们在去大脑猫中的肌肉间效应。这是通过比较抽搐收缩和拉伸作为供体输入对受体肌肉运动输出的影响来实现的。评估的供体-受体对包括那些在猫中已知只接受供体兴奋性肌梭反馈、抑制性 GTO 反馈或两者都有的。只有肌梭传入纤维的受体肌肉,肌肉拉伸而不是抽搐收缩,会引起兴奋。供体肌肉拉伸和抽搐收缩都会抑制仅具有 GTO 投射的受体肌肉。在一个同时接收肌梭和 GTO 投射的受体肌肉中,供体肌肉拉伸会引起兴奋和抑制两种效应,而抽搐收缩只会引起抑制效应。这些数据支持这样一种假设,即肌肉刺激引起的收缩可以引起最符合机械 GTO 受体激活而不是感觉轴突直接激活的肌肉间效应。我们提出,与肌肉拉伸或神经刺激相比,这种方法可以更有选择性地评估 GTO 回路,并可以适应于在自由活动的猫和人类中进行非侵入性的 GTO 反馈研究。