• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

好邻居比比皆是:在广阔的木本植物生境中,真菌内生菌很少表现出竞争排斥模式。

Good neighbors aplenty: fungal endophytes rarely exhibit competitive exclusion patterns across a span of woody habitats.

机构信息

Department of Biological Sciences, The George Washington University, Washington, D.C., 20052, USA.

Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Western Sydney University, Penrith, New South Wales, 2751, Australia.

出版信息

Ecology. 2019 Sep;100(9):e02790. doi: 10.1002/ecy.2790. Epub 2019 Jul 24.

DOI:10.1002/ecy.2790
PMID:31228251
Abstract

Environmental forces and biotic interactions, both positive and negative, structure ecological communities, but their relative roles remain obscure despite strong theory. For instance, ecologically similar species, based on the principle of limiting similarity, are expected to be most competitive and show negative interactions. Specious communities that assemble along broad environmental gradients afford the most power to test theory, but the communities often are difficult to quantify. Microbes, specifically fungal endophytes of wood, are especially suited for testing community assembly theory because they are relatively easy to sample across a comprehensive range of environmental space with clear axes of variation. Moreover, endophytes mediate key forest carbon cycle processes, and although saprophytic fungi from dead wood typically compete, endophytic fungi in living wood may enhance success through cooperative symbioses. To classify interactions within endophyte communities, we analyzed fungal DNA barcode variation across 22 woody plant species growing in woodlands near Richmond, New South Wales, Australia. We estimated the response of endophytes to the measured wood environment (i.e., 11 anatomical and chemical wood traits) and each other using latent-variable models and identified recurrent communities across wood environments using model-based classification. We used this information to evaluate whether (1) co-occurrence patterns are consistent with strong competitive exclusion, and (2) a priori classifications by trophic mode and phylum distinguish taxa that are more likely to have positive vs. negative associations under the principle of limiting similarity. Fungal endophytes were diverse (mean = 140 taxa/sample), with differences in community composition structured by wood traits. Variation in wood water content and carbon concentration were associated with especially large community shifts. Surprisingly, after accounting for wood traits, fungal species were still more than three times more likely to have positive than negative co-occurrence patterns. That is, patterns consistent with strong competitive exclusion were rare, and positive interactions among fungal endophytes were more common than expected. Confirming the frequency of positive vs. negative interactions among fungal taxa requires experimental tests, and our findings establish clear paths for further study. Evidence to date intriguingly suggests that, across a wide range of wood traits, cooperation may outweigh combat for these fungi.

摘要

环境因素和生物相互作用(包括正相互作用和负相互作用)共同构建了生态群落,但尽管理论基础很强,它们的相对作用仍然不清楚。例如,根据限制相似性原则,生态上相似的物种预计会具有最强的竞争力,并表现出负相互作用。沿着广泛的环境梯度组装的似是而非的群落为检验理论提供了最大的能力,但这些群落往往难以量化。微生物,特别是木材中的真菌内生菌,特别适合用于检验群落组装理论,因为它们相对容易在具有明确变化轴的综合环境范围内进行采样。此外,内生菌介导着关键的森林碳循环过程,虽然来自枯木的腐生真菌通常具有竞争性,但活木中的内生真菌可能通过共生合作来提高成功率。为了在内生菌群落中分类相互作用,我们分析了澳大利亚新南威尔士州里士满附近林地的 22 种木本植物中真菌 DNA 条码的变异。我们使用潜在变量模型估计内生菌对所测木材环境(即 11 种木材解剖和化学特性)的反应,以及彼此之间的反应,并使用基于模型的分类法识别木材环境中的重复群落。我们利用这些信息来评估以下两种情况:(1) 共生模式是否符合强烈的竞争排斥;(2) 基于营养模式和门的先验分类是否能区分在限制相似性原则下更有可能产生正相互作用或负相互作用的分类群。真菌内生菌种类繁多(平均每个样本 140 个分类群),群落组成的差异受木材特性的影响。木材水分含量和碳浓度的变化与群落的巨大变化有关。令人惊讶的是,在考虑木材特性后,真菌物种的正共现模式出现的可能性仍然是负共现模式的三倍多。也就是说,与强烈竞争排斥一致的模式很少见,真菌内生菌之间的正相互作用比预期的更为常见。要证实真菌分类群之间的正相互作用与负相互作用的频率,需要进行实验测试,而我们的研究结果为进一步研究提供了明确的途径。迄今为止的证据表明,在广泛的木材特性范围内,合作可能比这些真菌之间的竞争更为普遍。

相似文献

1
Good neighbors aplenty: fungal endophytes rarely exhibit competitive exclusion patterns across a span of woody habitats.好邻居比比皆是:在广阔的木本植物生境中,真菌内生菌很少表现出竞争排斥模式。
Ecology. 2019 Sep;100(9):e02790. doi: 10.1002/ecy.2790. Epub 2019 Jul 24.
2
Tree genotype and genetically based growth traits structure twig endophyte communities.树木基因型和基于遗传的生长特征构建嫩枝内生菌群落。
Am J Bot. 2014 Mar;101(3):467-78. doi: 10.3732/ajb.1400034. Epub 2014 Mar 14.
3
Host associations and beta diversity of fungal endophyte communities in New Guinea rainforest trees.新几内亚雨林树木中真菌内生菌群落的宿主关联与β多样性
Mol Ecol. 2016 Feb;25(3):825-41. doi: 10.1111/mec.13510. Epub 2016 Jan 19.
4
Plant Host Species and Geographic Distance Affect the Structure of Aboveground Fungal Symbiont Communities, and Environmental Filtering Affects Belowground Communities in a Coastal Dune Ecosystem.植物宿主物种和地理距离影响沿海沙丘生态系统中地上真菌共生体群落的结构,而环境过滤作用则影响地下群落。
Microb Ecol. 2016 May;71(4):912-26. doi: 10.1007/s00248-015-0712-6. Epub 2015 Dec 1.
5
Diversity, taxonomic composition, and functional aspects of fungal communities in living, senesced, and fallen leaves at five sites across North America.北美五个地点的活叶、衰老叶和落叶中真菌群落的多样性、分类组成及功能特征
PeerJ. 2016 Dec 13;4:e2768. doi: 10.7717/peerj.2768. eCollection 2016.
6
Citizen science data reveal ecological, historical and evolutionary factors shaping interactions between woody hosts and wood-inhabiting fungi.公民科学数据揭示了塑造木本寄主与木生真菌之间相互作用的生态、历史和进化因素。
New Phytol. 2016 Dec;212(4):1072-1082. doi: 10.1111/nph.14194. Epub 2016 Sep 23.
7
Fungal epiphytes and endophytes of coffee leaves (Coffea arabica).咖啡树叶(阿拉伯咖啡)的附生真菌和内生真菌。
Microb Ecol. 2005 Jul;50(1):1-8. doi: 10.1007/s00248-004-0002-1. Epub 2005 Aug 18.
8
Species associations overwhelm abiotic conditions to dictate the structure and function of wood-decay fungal communities.物种关联压倒非生物条件,决定了木质腐朽真菌群落的结构和功能。
Ecology. 2018 Apr;99(4):801-811. doi: 10.1002/ecy.2165. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
9
The effects of fungal root endophytes on plant growth are stable along gradients of abiotic habitat conditions.真菌根内共生体对植物生长的影响在非生物生境条件的梯度上是稳定的。
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2018 Feb 1;94(2). doi: 10.1093/femsec/fix162.
10
Associations between Ectomycorrhizal Fungi and Bacterial Needle Endophytes in Pinus radiata: Implications for Biotic Selection of Microbial Communities.辐射松中外生菌根真菌与细菌针叶内生菌之间的关联:对微生物群落生物选择的启示
Front Microbiol. 2016 Mar 31;7:399. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00399. eCollection 2016.

引用本文的文献

1
Variation in Microbiota and Chemical Components Within During Initial Wood Decay.木材初期腐朽过程中微生物群落和化学成分的变化
Microorganisms. 2025 Jul 25;13(8):1743. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms13081743.
2
Community Assembly Processes of Deadwood Mycobiome in a Tropical Forest Revealed by Long-Read Third-Generation Sequencing.通过长读长第三代测序揭示的热带森林枯木真菌群落的群落组装过程
Microb Ecol. 2024 May 3;87(1):66. doi: 10.1007/s00248-024-02372-5.
3
A new genus and two new species of (Helotiales, Ascomycota) discovered mainly from poaceous grasses native to Asia in Japan.
一个主要在日本从亚洲本土禾本科草本植物中发现的新属及两个新的柔膜菌目(子囊菌门)物种。
MycoKeys. 2023 Aug 14;99:45-85. doi: 10.3897/mycokeys.99.90117. eCollection 2023.
4
Stem traits, compartments and tree species affect fungal communities on decaying wood.茎特征、隔室和树种会影响腐朽木上的真菌群落。
Environ Microbiol. 2022 Aug;24(8):3625-3639. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.15953. Epub 2022 Mar 9.
5
AusTraits, a curated plant trait database for the Australian flora.AusTraits,一个经过精心整理的澳大利亚植物区系植物性状数据库。
Sci Data. 2021 Sep 30;8(1):254. doi: 10.1038/s41597-021-01006-6.
6
Empirical Support for the Pattern of Competitive Exclusion between Insect Parasitic Fungi.昆虫寄生真菌间竞争排斥模式的实证支持
J Fungi (Basel). 2021 May 14;7(5):385. doi: 10.3390/jof7050385.
7
The Ecology Underground coalition: building a collaborative future of belowground ecology and ecologists.地下生态联盟:构建地下生态学与生态学家的合作未来。
New Phytol. 2021 Mar;229(6):3058-3064. doi: 10.1111/nph.17163.
8
: An overlooked lineage of diverse endophytes.一类被忽视的多样内生菌谱系。
Stud Mycol. 2020 Mar 13;95:293-380. doi: 10.1016/j.simyco.2020.02.005. eCollection 2020 Mar.