• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

生殖和发育毒性测试中的暴露评估:IQ-DruSafe 行业调查当前实践和经验,以支持基于暴露的高剂量选择。

Exposure assessments in reproductive and developmental toxicity testing: An IQ-DruSafe industry survey on current practices and experiences in support of exposure-based high dose selection.

机构信息

Eisai Inc, Woodcliff Lake, NJ, USA.

Bristol-Myers Squibb, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.

出版信息

Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2019 Oct;107:104413. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2019.104413. Epub 2019 Jun 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.yrtph.2019.104413
PMID:31229519
Abstract

The draft ICH S5(R3) guideline includes an exposure-based endpoint as an option for selecting the high dose in developmental and reproductive toxicity (DART) studies. In 2016, IQ DruSafe conducted an anonymous survey to identify industry practices and experiences related to pharmacokinetic assessments in DART studies in order to facilitate a pragmatic data-driven approach to development of an acceptable multiple of the clinical exposure to be proposed for dose selection in the guideline. Questions in the survey were designed to explore pharmacokinetic differences in pregnant versus non-pregnant animals, and to assess exposure levels attained in the absence of maternal toxicity as well as DART outcomes in animal studies associated with those exposures. Small molecule and therapeutic proteins were analyzed separately. The key findings for small molecules were: a) differences in exposures between pregnant and non-pregnant animals were generally ≤3-fold, b) C or AUC exposures ≥25-fold the clinical exposure were achieved in the absence of maternal toxicity for 31% and 23% of rat and rabbit developmental toxicity studies, respectively, and c) only 3.3% (5/153) and 1.6% (2/128) of the developmental toxicity studies were positive for malformations or embryofetal lethality in rats and rabbits, respectively, that were not observed until exposure margins were ≥25-fold.

摘要

ICH S5(R3) 指导原则草案包含了一种基于暴露的终点,作为在发育和生殖毒性 (DART) 研究中选择高剂量的选择。2016 年,IQ DruSafe 进行了一项匿名调查,以确定与 DART 研究中的药代动力学评估相关的行业实践和经验,以便为基于临床暴露倍数的合理数据驱动方法的发展提供便利,以用于指导原则中的剂量选择。调查中的问题旨在探讨怀孕与非怀孕动物之间的药代动力学差异,并评估在没有母体毒性的情况下达到的暴露水平以及与这些暴露相关的动物研究中的 DART 结果。小分子和治疗性蛋白分别进行了分析。小分子的主要发现为:a) 怀孕与非怀孕动物之间的暴露差异一般≤3 倍,b) 在没有母体毒性的情况下,大鼠和兔发育毒性研究中分别有 31%和 23%达到了 C 或 AUC 暴露≥25 倍临床暴露,c) 只有 3.3%(5/153)和 1.6%(2/128)的大鼠和兔发育毒性研究出现畸形或胚胎致死,直到暴露倍数≥25 倍才观察到这些情况。

相似文献

1
Exposure assessments in reproductive and developmental toxicity testing: An IQ-DruSafe industry survey on current practices and experiences in support of exposure-based high dose selection.生殖和发育毒性测试中的暴露评估:IQ-DruSafe 行业调查当前实践和经验,以支持基于暴露的高剂量选择。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2019 Oct;107:104413. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2019.104413. Epub 2019 Jun 20.
2
Analysis of exposure margins in developmental toxicity studies for detection of human teratogens.发育毒性研究中暴露界限分析在人类致畸物检测中的应用。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2019 Jul;105:62-68. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2019.04.005. Epub 2019 Apr 11.
3
Evaluation of rat and rabbit embryofetal development studies with pharmaceuticals: the added value of a second species.评价药物的大鼠和兔胚胎-胎仔发育研究:第二种物种的增值作用。
Crit Rev Toxicol. 2024 Oct;54(9):619-633. doi: 10.1080/10408444.2024.2374281. Epub 2024 Aug 2.
4
Absence of developmental and reproductive toxicity in rats, rabbits, and zebrafish embryos exposed to antimalarial drug cabamiquine.抗疟药物卡巴喹对大鼠、兔子和斑马鱼胚胎的发育毒性和生殖毒性研究。
Birth Defects Res. 2024 Aug;116(8):e2389. doi: 10.1002/bdr2.2389.
5
Review of embryo-fetal developmental toxicity studies performed for pharmaceuticals approved by FDA in 2016 and 2017.2016 年和 2017 年 FDA 批准的药物的胚胎-胎儿发育毒性研究综述。
Reprod Toxicol. 2018 Sep;80:117-125. doi: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2018.04.008. Epub 2018 Apr 13.
6
Review of embryo-fetal developmental toxicity studies performed for pharmaceuticals approved by FDA in 2018 and 2019.2018 年和 2019 年美国食品和药物管理局批准的药物的胚胎-胎儿发育毒性研究综述。
Reprod Toxicol. 2021 Jan;99:144-151. doi: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2020.06.013. Epub 2020 Jun 25.
7
A strategy for safety assessment of chemicals with data gaps for developmental and/or reproductive toxicity.针对发育和/或生殖毒性数据存在缺口的化学品的安全性评估策略。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2015 Jul;72(2):202-15. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2015.04.006. Epub 2015 Apr 21.
8
Profiling the activity of environmental chemicals in prenatal developmental toxicity studies using the U.S. EPA's ToxRefDB.利用美国环境保护局的ToxRefDB对产前发育毒性研究中的环境化学物质活性进行分析。
Reprod Toxicol. 2009 Sep;28(2):209-19. doi: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2009.03.016. Epub 2009 Apr 10.
9
Developmental and reproductive toxicity testing of vaccines.疫苗的发育毒性和生殖毒性试验
J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods. 2012 Mar;65(2):58-63. doi: 10.1016/j.vascn.2011.12.001. Epub 2011 Dec 30.
10
The reproductive and developmental toxicity of the antifungal drug Nyotran (liposomal nystatin) in rats and rabbits.抗真菌药物Nyotran(脂质体制霉菌素)对大鼠和兔子的生殖与发育毒性。
Toxicol Sci. 2000 Feb;53(2):421-9. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/53.2.421.

引用本文的文献

1
Gene-nutrient interactions that impact magnesium homeostasis increase risk for neural tube defects in mice exposed to dolutegravir.影响镁稳态的基因-营养素相互作用会增加暴露于多替拉韦的小鼠发生神经管缺陷的风险。
Front Cell Dev Biol. 2023 Jun 12;11:1175917. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2023.1175917. eCollection 2023.