Expert Center Clinical Chemistry Eindhoven, Eindhoven, the Netherlands; Clinical Laboratory, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Eindhoven, the Netherlands; Laboratory of Chemical Biology, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, the Netherlands; Clinical Laboratory, Máxima Medical Center, Veldhoven, the Netherlands.
Expert Center Clinical Chemistry Eindhoven, Eindhoven, the Netherlands; Clinical Laboratory, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
J Mol Diagn. 2019 Sep;21(5):895-902. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2019.05.003. Epub 2019 Jun 21.
For patients with suspected lung carcinoma, the analysis of circulating tumor DNA, obtained by liquid biopsy, has the potential to support cancer diagnosis and guide targeted therapy. To ensure sensitive and reproducible detection of circulating tumor DNA in routine clinical practice, a standardized (pre) analytical workflow is required. Plasma was obtained from patients and healthy volunteers. Using the QIAmp Circulating Nucleic Acid Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), six different procedures for the isolation of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) were compared. cfDNA was analyzed by droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) for KRAS G12/13 mutations and for EGFR Ex19Del, L858R, and L861Q mutations using an in-house EGFR multiplex assay. A new isolation procedure that yields extracts with significantly higher cfDNA concentrations than described previously was selected (P < 0.001). EGFR and KRAS assay sensitivity of at least 0.2% fractional abundance was guaranteed for approximately 76% of patient samples in one run. A flowchart that includes validity criteria for a standardized analytical workflow of ddPCR analysis was designed. An improved protocol for cfDNA isolation enables a higher cfDNA input for ddPCR. The use of sensitive KRAS and EGFR multiplex assays and accompanying validity criteria allows for controlled and efficient testing of patient samples at lower costs. Using the suggested workflow, a guaranteed, reliable, and sensitive analysis of cfDNA can be performed using ddPCR in routine clinical practice.
对于疑似肺癌的患者,通过液体活检获得的循环肿瘤 DNA 分析有可能支持癌症诊断并指导靶向治疗。为了确保在常规临床实践中能够灵敏且可重复地检测循环肿瘤 DNA,需要标准化的(预)分析工作流程。从患者和健康志愿者中获得血浆。使用 QIAmp Circulating Nucleic Acid Kit(Qiagen,德国 Hilden),比较了六种不同的游离 DNA(cfDNA)分离程序。使用内部 EGFR 多重分析,通过液滴数字 PCR(ddPCR)对 KRAS G12/13 突变和 EGFR Ex19Del、L858R 和 L861Q 突变进行 cfDNA 分析。选择了一种新的分离程序,与之前描述的相比,该程序可获得 cfDNA 浓度显著更高的提取物(P<0.001)。在一次运行中,大约 76%的患者样本保证了 EGFR 和 KRAS 检测灵敏度至少为 0.2%的分数丰度。设计了一个包括 ddPCR 分析标准化分析工作流程的有效性标准的流程图。cfDNA 分离的改进方案允许对 ddPCR 进行更高的 cfDNA 输入。使用灵敏的 KRAS 和 EGFR 多重分析以及伴随的有效性标准,可以以较低的成本对患者样本进行受控且高效的检测。使用建议的工作流程,可以在常规临床实践中使用 ddPCR 进行有保证、可靠且灵敏的 cfDNA 分析。