Ysseldyk Renate, Greenaway Katharine H, Hassinger Elena, Zutrauen Sarah, Lintz Jana, Bhatia Maya P, Frye Margaret, Starkenburg Else, Tai Vera
Department of Health Sciences, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Front Psychol. 2019 Jun 4;10:1297. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01297. eCollection 2019.
Several challenges (e.g., sexism, parental leave, the glass ceiling, etc.) disproportionately affect women in academia (and beyond), and thus perpetuate the leaky pipeline metaphor for women who opt-out of an academic career. Although this pattern can be seen at all levels of the academic hierarchy, a critical time for women facing such challenges is during the postdoctoral stage, when personal life transitions and professional ambitions collide. Using a social identity approach, we explore factors affecting the mental health of postdoctoral women, including identity development (e.g., as a mother, a scientist) and lack of control (uncertainty about one's future personal and professional prospects), which likely contribute to the leak from academia. In this mixed-method research, Study 1 comprised interviews with postdoctoral women in North America ( = 13) and Europe ( = 8) across a range disciplines (e.g., psychology, physics, political science). Common themes included the negative impact of career uncertainty, gender-based challenges (especially sexism and maternity leave), and work-life balance on mental and physical health. However, interviewees also described attempts to overcome gender inequality and institutional barriers by drawing on support networks. Study 2 comprised an online survey of postdoctoral women ( = 146) from a range of countries and academic disciplines to assess the relationships between social identification (e.g., disciplinary, gender, social group), perceived control (i.e., over work and life), and mental health (i.e., depression, anxiety, stress, and life satisfaction). Postdoctoral women showed mild levels of stress and depression, and were only slightly satisfied with life. They also showed only moderate levels of perceived control over one's life and work. However, hierarchical regression analyses revealed that strongly identifying with one's discipline was most consistently positively associated with both perceived control and mental health. Collectively, these findings implicate the postdoctoral stage as being stressful and tenuous for women regardless of academic background or nationality. They also highlight the importance of disciplinary identity as a potentially protective factor for mental health that, in turn, may diminish the rate at which postdoctoral women leak from the academic pipeline.
一些挑战(例如性别歧视、育儿假、玻璃天花板等)对学术界(及其他领域)的女性产生了不成比例的影响,从而使“人才流失管道”这一比喻持续适用于那些选择退出学术生涯的女性。尽管这种模式在学术等级制度的各个层面都能看到,但女性面临这些挑战的关键时期是在博士后阶段,此时个人生活的转变与职业抱负相互冲突。运用社会认同方法,我们探讨了影响博士后女性心理健康的因素,包括身份认同发展(例如作为母亲、科学家)以及缺乏掌控感(对个人未来和职业前景的不确定性),这些因素可能导致她们从学术界流失。在这项混合方法研究中,研究1包括对北美(n = 13)和欧洲(n = 8)多个学科领域(例如心理学、物理学、政治学)的博士后女性进行访谈。共同主题包括职业不确定性、基于性别的挑战(尤其是性别歧视和产假)以及工作与生活平衡对身心健康的负面影响。然而,受访者也描述了通过利用支持网络来克服性别不平等和制度障碍的尝试。研究2包括对来自一系列国家和学术学科的博士后女性(n = 146)进行在线调查,以评估社会认同(例如学科、性别、社会群体)、感知到的掌控感(即对工作和生活的掌控)与心理健康(即抑郁、焦虑、压力和生活满意度)之间的关系。博士后女性表现出轻度的压力和抑郁水平,对生活的满意度也仅为中等。她们对自己生活和工作的掌控感也仅处于中等水平。然而,分层回归分析表明,强烈认同自己的学科与感知到的掌控感和心理健康最始终呈现正相关。总体而言,这些发现表明博士后阶段对女性来说压力重重且不稳定,无论其学术背景或国籍如何。它们还强调了学科身份作为心理健康潜在保护因素的重要性,这反过来可能会降低博士后女性从学术管道中流失的比率。