Department of Cardiology, Rui Jin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, People's Republic of China.
Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 197 Rui Jin Road II, Shanghai, 200025, People's Republic of China.
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2019 Jun 24;18(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s12933-019-0888-z.
We investigated whether or to what extent the interaction of lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] with cholesterol-containing lipids was associated with angiographic coronary collateralization in type 2 diabetic patients with chronic total occlusion.
Serum levels of Lp(a), total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C), and triglyceride were determined and non-HDL-C was calculated in 706 type 2 diabetic and 578 non-diabetic patients with stable coronary artery disease and angiographic total occlusion of at least one major coronary artery. The degree of collaterals supplying the distal aspect of a total occlusion from the contra-lateral vessel was graded as poor (Rentrop score of 0 or 1) or good coronary collateralization (Rentrop score of 2 or 3).
For diabetic and non-diabetic patients, Lp(a), total cholesterol, LDL-C, and non-HDL-C levels were higher in patients with poor coronary collateralization than in those with good collateralization, whereas HDL-C and triglyceride levels were similar. After adjustment for potential confounding factors, tertiles of Lp(a), total cholesterol, LDL-C and non-HDL-C remained independent determinants for poor collateralization. A significant interaction between Lp(a) and total cholesterol, LDL-C or non-HDL-C was observed in diabetic patients (all P interaction < 0.001) but not in non-diabetics. At high tertile of total cholesterol (≥ 5.35 mmol/L), LDL-C (≥ 3.36 mmol/L) and non-HDL-C (≥ 4.38 mmol/L), diabetic patients with high tertile of Lp(a) (≥ 30.23 mg/dL) had an increased risk of poor collateralization compared with those with low tertile of Lp(a) (< 12.66 mg/dL) (adjusted OR = 4.300, 3.970 and 4.386, respectively, all P < 0.001).
Increased Lp(a) confers greater risk for poor coronary collateralization when total cholesterol, LDL-C or non-HDL-C are elevated especially for patients with type 2 diabetes.
我们研究了脂蛋白(a)[Lp(a)]与含胆固醇脂质的相互作用在 2 型糖尿病慢性完全闭塞患者的冠状动脉侧支循环中的程度和作用。
在 706 例 2 型糖尿病和 578 例非糖尿病稳定型冠心病且至少有一支主要冠状动脉完全闭塞的患者中,测定血清 Lp(a)、总胆固醇、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-C)和甘油三酯水平,并计算非高密度脂蛋白胆固醇。将闭塞远端来自对侧血管的侧支循环程度分为差(Rentrop 评分 0 或 1)或良好(Rentrop 评分 2 或 3)。
对于糖尿病和非糖尿病患者,侧支循环不良患者的 Lp(a)、总胆固醇、LDL-C 和非高密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平高于侧支循环良好患者,而 HDL-C 和甘油三酯水平相似。调整潜在混杂因素后,Lp(a)、总胆固醇、LDL-C 和非高密度脂蛋白胆固醇三分位仍为侧支循环不良的独立决定因素。在糖尿病患者中观察到 Lp(a)与总胆固醇、LDL-C 或非高密度脂蛋白胆固醇之间存在显著交互作用(所有 P 交互 <0.001),而非糖尿病患者则没有。在总胆固醇(≥5.35mmol/L)和 LDL-C(≥3.36mmol/L)和非高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(≥4.38mmol/L)的高三分位数时,Lp(a)(≥30.23mg/dL)的糖尿病患者发生侧支循环不良的风险高于 Lp(a)(低三分位数 <12.66mg/dL)(校正 OR=4.300、3.970 和 4.386,均 P<0.001)。
当总胆固醇、LDL-C 或非高密度脂蛋白胆固醇升高时,Lp(a)升高增加了侧支循环不良的风险,尤其是对于 2 型糖尿病患者。