Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Institute of Population Health Sciences, National Health Research Institutes, Miaoli, Taiwan; Graduate Institute of Biostatistics, College of Public Health, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.
Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
J Formos Med Assoc. 2020 Jan;119(1 Pt 2):335-344. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2019.05.027. Epub 2019 Jun 22.
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation may occur in >10% of patients with lymphoma and resolved HBV infection who undergo rituximab-containing chemotherapy. Preventive strategies may have marked impact on resource allocation in HBV endemic areas. This study aims to compare the cost-effectiveness between prophylactic antiviral therapy and HBV DNA monitoring for the prevention of HBV-related complications.
Data sources are studies of HBV-related events and survival for patients with lymphoma and resolved HBV infection published since 2006. Decision tree analysis was used to compare the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of preventing HBV-related death or liver decompensation for patients who undergo first-line rituximab-containing chemotherapy. Sensitivity analysis was performed to examine the impact of the preventive efficacy, the duration of prophylactic antiviral therapy, and the cost of different interventions. The direct medical cost was derived from the database of the NHI Administration, Taiwan. The time frame of our analysis was set to 3 years after the completion of chemotherapy.
The median ICER of prophylactic antiviral therapy, according to current practice guidelines, ranged between USD 150,000 and 250,000 if we apply the guidelines generally. When a long-course (12 months after completion of chemotherapy according to clinical guidelines) prophylactic therapy was assumed, Option A was cheaper and more effective only in the anti-HBs-negative subgroup (median ICER US$149,932 vs. US$161,526, p = 0.013).
Identification of anti-HBs-negative subgroups is critical to improve the cost-effectiveness of prophylactic antiviral therapy in lymphoma patients with resolved HBV infection.
背景/目的:接受含利妥昔单抗化疗的淋巴瘤和已治愈乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)感染患者中,>10%可能发生 HBV 再激活。预防策略可能对 HBV 流行地区的资源分配产生重大影响。本研究旨在比较预防性抗病毒治疗与 HBV DNA 监测在预防 HBV 相关并发症方面的成本效益。
数据来源为 2006 年以来发表的关于淋巴瘤和已治愈 HBV 感染患者 HBV 相关事件和生存的研究。决策树分析用于比较一线含利妥昔单抗化疗患者预防 HBV 相关死亡或肝功能失代偿的增量成本效益比(ICER)。进行敏感性分析以检验预防效果、预防性抗病毒治疗持续时间和不同干预措施成本的影响。直接医疗成本来自台湾健保署数据库。我们的分析时间框架设定为化疗完成后 3 年。
根据现行实践指南,预防性抗病毒治疗的中位 ICER 在 15 万至 25 万美元之间,如果普遍应用指南。当假设采用长疗程(根据临床指南,在化疗完成后 12 个月)预防性治疗时,仅在抗-HBs 阴性亚组中,方案 A 更便宜且更有效(中位 ICER 为 149932 美元 vs. 161526 美元,p=0.013)。
确定抗-HBs 阴性亚组对于提高已治愈 HBV 感染的淋巴瘤患者预防性抗病毒治疗的成本效益至关重要。