Mohajerzadeh Leily, Lotfollahzadeh Saran, Vosoughi Armin, Harirforoosh Iman, Parsay Sina, Amirifar Hesam, Farahbakhsh Nazanin, Atqiaee Khashayar
Pediatric Surgery Research Center, Research Institute for Children's Health, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Iran.
Neurosciences Research Center, Iran.
Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019 Jun;52(3):125-130. doi: 10.5090/kjtcs.2019.52.3.125. Epub 2019 Jun 5.
To compare the outcomes of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) in comparison to open thoracic surgery in pediatric patients suffering from empyema.
A prospective study was carried out in 80 patients referred to the Department of Pediatric Surgery between 2015 and 2018. The patients were randomly divided into thoracotomy and VATS groups (groups I and II, respectively). Forty patients were in the thoracotomy group (16 males [40%], 24 females [60%]; average age, 5.77±4.08 years) and 40 patients were in the VATS group (18 males [45%], 22 females [55%]; average age, 6.27±3.67 years). There were no significant differences in age (p=0.61) or sex (p=0.26). Routine preliminary workups for all patients were ordered, and the patients were followed up for 90 days at regular intervals.
The average length of hospital stay (16.28±7.83 days vs. 15.83±9.44 days, p=0.04) and the duration of treatment needed for pain relief (10 days vs. 5 days, p=0.004) were longer in the thoracotomy group than in the VATS group. Thoracotomy patients had surgical wound infections in 27.3% of cases, whereas no cases of infection were reported in the VATS group (p=0.04).
Our results indicate that VATS was not only less invasive than thoracotomy, but also showed promising results, such as an earlier discharge from the hospital and fewer postoperative complications.
比较电视辅助胸腔镜手术(VATS)与开胸手术治疗小儿脓胸的效果。
对2015年至2018年间转诊至小儿外科的80例患者进行前瞻性研究。患者被随机分为开胸组和VATS组(分别为I组和II组)。开胸组40例患者(男16例[40%],女24例[60%];平均年龄5.77±4.08岁),VATS组40例患者(男18例[45%],女22例[55%];平均年龄6.27±3.67岁)。年龄(p=0.61)和性别(p=0.26)无显著差异。对所有患者进行常规初步检查,并定期随访90天。
开胸组的平均住院时间(16.28±7.83天 vs. 15.83±9.44天,p=0.04)和疼痛缓解所需治疗时间(10天 vs. 5天,p=0.004)均长于VATS组。开胸组患者手术伤口感染率为27.3%,而VATS组未报告感染病例(p=0.04)。
我们的结果表明,VATS不仅比开胸手术创伤小,而且显示出良好的效果,如更早出院和更少的术后并发症。