Mällinen Jari, Vaarala Siina, Mäkinen Markus, Lietzén Elina, Grönroos Juha, Ohtonen Pasi, Rautio Tero, Salminen Paulina
Department of Surgery, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland.
Division of Operative Care, Oulu University Hospital and Medical Research Center Oulu, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2019 Aug;34(8):1393-1400. doi: 10.1007/s00384-019-03332-z. Epub 2019 Jun 24.
Acute appendicitis may present as uncomplicated and complicated and these disease forms differ both epidemiologically and clinically. Complicated acute appendicitis has traditionally been defined as an appendicitis complicated by perforation or a periappendicular abscess, and an appendicolith represents a predisposing factor of complicated disease. There are histopathological differences between uncomplicated acute appendicitis and the previously established traditional forms of complicated acute appendicitis, but to our knowledge, the histopathological differences between uncomplicated acute appendicitis and complicated acute appendicitis presenting with an appendicolith have not yet been reported. The study purpose was to assess these differences with two prospective patient cohorts: (1) computed tomography (CT) confirmed uncomplicated acute appendicitis patients enrolled in the surgical treatment arm of the randomized APPAC trial comparing appendectomy with antibiotics for the treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis and (2) patients with CT-verified acute appendicitis presenting with an appendicolith excluded from the APPAC trial.
The following histopathological parameters were assessed: appendiceal diameter, depth of inflammation, micro-abscesses, density of eosinophils, and neutrophils in appendiceal wall and surface epithelium degeneration.
Using multivariable logistic regression models adjusted for age, gender, and symptom duration, statistically significant differences were detected in the depth of inflammation ≤ 2.8 mm (adjusted OR 2.18 (95%CI: 1.29-3.71, p = 0.004), micro-abscesses (adjusted OR 2.16 (95%CI: 1.22-3.83, p = 0.008), the number of eosinophils and neutrophils ≥ 150/mm (adjusted OR 0.97 (95%CI: 0.95-0.99, p = 0.013), adjusted OR 3.04 (95%CI: 1.82-5.09, p < 0.001, respectively).
These results corroborate the known clinical association of an appendicolith to complicated acute appendicitis.
急性阑尾炎可表现为单纯性和复杂性,这两种疾病形式在流行病学和临床方面均存在差异。传统上,复杂性急性阑尾炎被定义为并发穿孔或阑尾周围脓肿的阑尾炎,阑尾结石是导致疾病复杂化的一个易感因素。单纯性急性阑尾炎与先前已确定的传统形式的复杂性急性阑尾炎之间存在组织病理学差异,但据我们所知,单纯性急性阑尾炎与伴有阑尾结石的复杂性急性阑尾炎之间的组织病理学差异尚未见报道。本研究的目的是通过两个前瞻性患者队列评估这些差异:(1)计算机断层扫描(CT)确诊的单纯性急性阑尾炎患者,这些患者入选了比较阑尾切除术与抗生素治疗单纯性急性阑尾炎的随机APPAC试验的手术治疗组;(2)CT证实患有急性阑尾炎且伴有阑尾结石的患者,这些患者被排除在APPAC试验之外。
评估以下组织病理学参数:阑尾直径、炎症深度、微脓肿、嗜酸性粒细胞密度以及阑尾壁和表面上皮变性中的中性粒细胞。
使用针对年龄、性别和症状持续时间进行调整的多变量逻辑回归模型,在炎症深度≤2.8毫米(调整后的比值比为2.18(95%置信区间:1.29 - 3.71,p = 0.004))、微脓肿(调整后的比值比为2.16(95%置信区间:1.22 - 3.83,p = 0.008))、嗜酸性粒细胞和中性粒细胞数量≥150/mm(调整后的比值比分别为0.97(95%置信区间:0.95 - 0.99,p = 0.013)、3.04(95%置信区间:1.82 - 5.09,p < 0.001))方面检测到具有统计学意义的差异。
这些结果证实了阑尾结石与复杂性急性阑尾炎之间已知的临床关联。