• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开发并验证一种新的评分系统,以区分单纯性和复杂性阑尾炎。

Development and validation of a new scoring system to discriminate between uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Teikyo University Chiba Medical Center, 3426-3 Anesaki, Ichihara, 299-0111, Japan.

Department of Esophago-Gastrointestinal Surgery, Chiba Cancer Center, Chiba, Japan.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 27;14(1):19825. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-70904-7.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-024-70904-7
PMID:39191912
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11349979/
Abstract

A scoring system to discriminate between uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis is beneficial to determine the optimal treatment for acute appendicitis. We developed a scoring system to discriminate between uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis and assessed the clinical usefulness of the scoring system using external validation. A total of 299 patients with acute appendicitis were retrospectively reviewed. One hundred and ninety-nine patients were assigned to the model development group, while the other 100 patients were assigned to an external validation group. A scoring system for complicated appendicitis was created using a final multivariate logistic regression model with six independent predictors. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the scoring system was 0.882 (95% confidence interval: 0.835-0.929). The cutoff point of the scoring system was 12, and the sensitivity and specificity were 82.9% and 86.2%, respectively. In the external validation group, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the scoring system was 0.868 (95% confidence interval 0.794-0.942), and there was no significant difference between the groups in the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (P = 0.750). Our newly developed scoring system may contribute to prompt determination of the optimal treatment for acute appendicitis.

摘要

一个用于区分单纯性和复杂性阑尾炎的评分系统有助于确定急性阑尾炎的最佳治疗方法。我们开发了一个用于区分单纯性和复杂性阑尾炎的评分系统,并通过外部验证评估了该评分系统的临床实用性。回顾性分析了 299 例急性阑尾炎患者。其中 199 例患者被分配到模型开发组,而另外 100 例患者被分配到外部验证组。使用最终的多变量逻辑回归模型创建了一个用于复杂性阑尾炎的评分系统,该模型包含 6 个独立的预测因素。评分系统的受试者工作特征曲线下面积为 0.882(95%置信区间:0.835-0.929)。评分系统的截断点为 12,灵敏度和特异性分别为 82.9%和 86.2%。在外部验证组中,评分系统的受试者工作特征曲线下面积为 0.868(95%置信区间 0.794-0.942),两组间受试者工作特征曲线下面积无显著差异(P=0.750)。我们新开发的评分系统可能有助于迅速确定急性阑尾炎的最佳治疗方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c585/11349979/563008eb95f0/41598_2024_70904_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c585/11349979/b789a3bc65d0/41598_2024_70904_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c585/11349979/563008eb95f0/41598_2024_70904_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c585/11349979/b789a3bc65d0/41598_2024_70904_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c585/11349979/563008eb95f0/41598_2024_70904_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Development and validation of a new scoring system to discriminate between uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis.开发并验证一种新的评分系统,以区分单纯性和复杂性阑尾炎。
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 27;14(1):19825. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-70904-7.
2
Preoperative assessment of complicated appendicitis through stress reaction and clinical manifestations.通过应激反应和临床表现对复杂性阑尾炎进行术前评估。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Jun;98(23):e15768. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000015768.
3
Predicting complicated appendicitis based on clinical findings: the role of Alvarado and Appendicitis Inflammatory Response scores.基于临床发现预测复杂阑尾炎:Alvarado 和阑尾炎炎症反应评分的作用。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2022 Aug;407(5):2051-2057. doi: 10.1007/s00423-022-02533-5. Epub 2022 May 11.
4
Logistic regression model to predict acute uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis.用于预测急性单纯性阑尾炎和复杂性阑尾炎的逻辑回归模型。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2019 Feb;101(2):107-118. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2018.0152. Epub 2018 Oct 5.
5
Is preoperative distinction between complicated and uncomplicated acute appendicitis feasible without imaging?在不进行影像学检查的情况下,术前区分复杂性和非复杂性急性阑尾炎是否可行?
Surgery. 2016 Sep;160(3):789-95. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.04.021. Epub 2016 Jun 3.
6
Performance and diagnostic accuracy of scoring systems in adult patients with suspected appendicitis.成人疑似阑尾炎患者评分系统的性能及诊断准确性
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 Jul 6;408(1):267. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-02991-5.
7
Usefulness of several factors and clinical scoring models in preoperative diagnosis of complicated appendicitis.几种因素和临床评分模型在复杂阑尾炎术前诊断中的应用。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 27;16(7):e0255253. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255253. eCollection 2021.
8
Usefulness of serum sodium levels as a novel marker for predicting acute appendicitis severity: a retrospective cohort study.血清钠水平作为预测急性阑尾炎严重程度的新型标志物的实用性:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Surg. 2023 Oct 14;23(1):312. doi: 10.1186/s12893-023-02224-y.
9
Receiver operating characteristic analysis of leukocyte counts in operations for suspected appendicitis.疑似阑尾炎手术中白细胞计数的受试者工作特征分析
Am J Emerg Med. 2008 Sep;26(7):769-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2007.10.036.
10
Procalcitonin as an excellent differential marker between uncomplicated and complicated acute appendicitis in adult patients.降钙素原作为成人单纯性和复杂性急性阑尾炎的优秀鉴别标志物。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2020 Aug;46(4):853-858. doi: 10.1007/s00068-019-01116-2. Epub 2019 May 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Low-keV virtual monoenergetic images with rapid kilovoltage-switching DECT for differentiating complicated from uncomplicated appendicitis in adults.采用快速千伏切换双能CT的低keV虚拟单能图像鉴别成人复杂性与非复杂性阑尾炎
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2025 Jul 17. doi: 10.1007/s00261-025-05124-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Development of a scoring model based on objective factors to predict gangrenous/perforated appendicitis.基于客观因素的坏疽性/穿孔性阑尾炎预测评分模型的建立。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2023 Jun 7;23(1):198. doi: 10.1186/s12876-023-02767-7.
2
Diagnosis and Management of Acute Appendicitis in Adults: A Review.成人急性阑尾炎的诊断与管理:综述
JAMA. 2021 Dec 14;326(22):2299-2311. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.20502.
3
Periappendiceal fat-stranding models for discriminating between complicated and uncomplicated acute appendicitis: a diagnostic and validation study.
阑尾周围脂肪条纹模型用于鉴别复杂型和单纯型急性阑尾炎:一项诊断和验证研究。
World J Emerg Surg. 2021 Oct 13;16(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s13017-021-00398-5.
4
Prediction Model for Failure of Nonoperative Management of Uncomplicated Appendicitis in Adults.成人单纯性阑尾炎非手术治疗失败的预测模型。
World J Surg. 2021 Oct;45(10):3041-3047. doi: 10.1007/s00268-021-06213-1. Epub 2021 Jun 22.
5
Validation of a Scoring System to Distinguish Uncomplicated From Complicated Appendicitis.评分系统区分单纯性与复杂性阑尾炎的验证。
J Surg Res. 2021 Feb;258:231-238. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.08.050. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
6
Diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis: 2020 update of the WSES Jerusalem guidelines.急性阑尾炎的诊断和治疗:WSES 耶路撒冷指南 2020 年更新版。
World J Emerg Surg. 2020 Apr 15;15(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s13017-020-00306-3.
7
Interval laparoscopic appendectomy after antibiotic therapy for appendiceal abscess in elderly patients.老年患者阑尾脓肿经抗生素治疗后行间隔期腹腔镜阑尾切除术。
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2020 Jul;13(3):311-318. doi: 10.1111/ases.12758. Epub 2019 Oct 16.
8
CT in Differentiating Complicated From Uncomplicated Appendicitis: Presence of Any of 10 CT Features Versus Radiologists' Gestalt Assessment.CT 鉴别复杂与单纯性阑尾炎:10 项 CT 特征的存在与放射科医生的整体评估相比。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019 Nov;213(5):W218-W227. doi: 10.2214/AJR.19.21331. Epub 2019 Aug 15.
9
Validation of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma emergency general surgery score for acute appendicitis-an EAST multicenter study.美国创伤外科学会急诊普通外科评分对急性阑尾炎的验证——一项 EAST 多中心研究。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2019 Jul;87(1):134-139. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002319.
10
Appendicolith appendicitis is clinically complicated acute appendicitis-is it histopathologically different from uncomplicated acute appendicitis.阑尾结石性阑尾炎临床上属于复杂性急性阑尾炎,其组织病理学与非复杂性急性阑尾炎有差异吗?
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2019 Aug;34(8):1393-1400. doi: 10.1007/s00384-019-03332-z. Epub 2019 Jun 24.