Fecchio Alan, Collins Michael D, Bell Jeffrey A, García-Trejo Erick A, Sánchez-González Luis A, Dispoto Janice H, Rice Nathan H, Weckstein Jason D
1 Laboratório de Evolução e Biogeografia, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Salvador, BA 40170115, Brazil.
2 Department of Ornithology, Academy of Natural Sciences of Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.
J Parasitol. 2019 Jun;105(3):446-453.
Birds harbor a diverse group of haemosporidian parasites that reproduce and develop in the host blood cells, muscle tissue, and various organs, which can cause negative effects on the survival and reproduction of their avian hosts. Characterization of the diversity, distribution, host specificity, prevalence patterns, and phylogenetic relationships of these parasites is critical to the study of avian host-parasite ecology and evolution and for understanding and preventing epidemics in wild bird populations. Here, we tested whether muscle and liver samples collected as part of standard ornithological museum expeditions can be examined to study the diversity and distributions of haemosporidians in the same way as blood collected from individual birds that are typically banded and released. We used a standard molecular diagnostic screening method for mitochondrial DNA (cytochrome ) of the parasites and found that blood, muscle, and liver collected from the same host individual provide similar estimates of prevalence and diversity of haemosporidians from the genera and . Although we found higher prevalence for the genus when we screened blood vs. liver and muscle samples, the estimates of the diversity of from different tissue types are not affected at the community level. Given these results, we conclude that for several reasons existing museum genetic resources collections are valuable data sources for the study of haemosporidians. First, ornithological museum collections around the world house tens of thousands of vouchered tissue samples collected from remote regions of the world. Second, the host specimens are vouchered and thus host identification and phenotype are permanently documented in databased archives with a diversity of associated ancillary data. Thus, not only can identifications be confirmed but also a diversity of morphological measurements and data can be measured and accessed for these host specimens in perpetuity.
鸟类体内寄生着多种血孢子虫寄生虫,它们在宿主的血细胞、肌肉组织和各种器官中繁殖和发育,这可能会对其鸟类宿主的生存和繁殖产生负面影响。了解这些寄生虫的多样性、分布、宿主特异性、流行模式和系统发育关系,对于研究鸟类宿主 - 寄生虫生态学和进化,以及理解和预防野生鸟类种群中的流行病至关重要。在这里,我们测试了作为标准鸟类学博物馆考察一部分收集的肌肉和肝脏样本,是否可以像从通常佩戴脚环并放飞的个体鸟类采集的血液一样,用于研究血孢子虫的多样性和分布。我们使用了一种针对寄生虫线粒体DNA(细胞色素)的标准分子诊断筛查方法,发现从同一宿主个体采集的血液、肌肉和肝脏,对疟原虫属和疟原虫属血孢子虫的流行率和多样性估计相似。尽管我们发现筛查血液样本时疟原虫属的流行率高于肝脏和肌肉样本,但不同组织类型的疟原虫属多样性估计在群落水平上不受影响。基于这些结果,我们得出结论,由于几个原因,现有的博物馆遗传资源收藏是研究血孢子虫的宝贵数据源。首先,世界各地的鸟类学博物馆收藏了从世界偏远地区采集的数以万计的有凭证的组织样本。其次,宿主标本有凭证,因此宿主识别和表型在数据库档案中永久记录,并伴有各种相关的辅助数据。因此,不仅可以确认鉴定结果,而且可以永久测量和获取这些宿主标本的各种形态测量数据和其他数据。