Loreto Denise Bolten Lucion, de Barros Beatriz Álvares Cabral, Rosa Gabriela Cauduro da, de Oliveira Rogerio Nogueira, Rosing Cassiano Kuchenbecker, Fernandes Mário Marques
Brazilian Dentistry Association, Section Rio Grande do Sul, Department of Forensic Dentistry, 134 H Furriel Luiz Antonio de Vargas St, Porto Alegre, RS, 90470-130, Brazil.
Federal University of Santa Catarina, Department of Dentistry, 1240 Delfino Conti St, Florianópolis, SC, 88040-370, Brazil.
J Forensic Sci. 2019 Nov;64(6):1693-1697. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.14089. Epub 2019 Jun 10.
The purpose of expert reports is to support the judge in his decisions, by providing technical information. However, it remains uncertain as to what extent the content of these reports is used, and if they are effectively associated with judicial decisions. The aim of this study was to perform a qualitative analysis of case reports in relation to the judicial decisions rendered in association with these reports, by determining the connection between causal nexus and aspects of fault. The case reports included lawsuits against dentists, issued by the Medical Justice Department of the State Court of Appeals of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, between 2010 and 2013. Comparing the percentage of agreement between case report and judicial decision, causal nexus was 79.9% and fault was 86.7%. The high percentages of agreement found in relation to fault and causal nexus highlight the relevance of expert reports in weighing the judge's decision.
专家报告的目的是通过提供技术信息来协助法官做出决策。然而,这些报告的内容在多大程度上被使用,以及它们是否与司法判决有效关联,仍不明确。本研究的目的是通过确定因果关系与过错方面之间的联系,对与这些报告相关的司法判决中的案例报告进行定性分析。案例报告包括2010年至2013年期间巴西南里奥格兰德州上诉法院医疗司法部门发布的针对牙医的诉讼。比较案例报告与司法判决之间的一致百分比,因果关系为79.9%,过错为86.7%。在过错和因果关系方面发现的高一致百分比突出了专家报告在权衡法官判决方面的相关性。