Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Jan;55(1):125-131. doi: 10.1002/uog.20382. Epub 2019 Dec 13.
To determine intra- and interrater reliability and agreement for ultrasound measurements of pelvic floor muscle contraction and to assess the correlation between ultrasound and vaginal palpation. We also aimed to develop an ultrasound scale for assessment of pelvic floor muscle contraction.
This was a cross-sectional study of 195 women scheduled for stress urinary incontinence (n = 65) or prolapse (n = 65) surgery or who were primigravid (n = 65). Pelvic floor muscle contraction was assessed by vaginal palpation using the Modified Oxford Scale (MOS) and by two- and three-dimensional (2D/3D) transperineal ultrasound. Proportional change in 2D and 3D levator hiatal anteroposterior (AP) diameter and 3D levator hiatal area between rest and contraction were used as measures of pelvic floor muscle contraction. One rater repeated all ultrasound measurements on stored volumes, which were used for intrarater reliability and agreement analysis, and three independent raters analyzed 60 ultrasound volumes for interrater reliability and agreement analysis. Reliability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and agreement using Bland-Altman analysis. Tomographic ultrasound was used to identify women with major levator injury. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (r ) was used to assess the correlation between ultrasound measurements of pelvic floor muscle contraction and MOS score. The proportion of women allocated to each category of muscle contraction (absent, weak, moderate or strong) by palpation was used to determine the cut-offs for the ultrasound scale.
Intrarater ICC was 0.81 (95% CI, 0.74-0.85) for proportional change in 2D levator hiatal AP diameter. Interrater ICC was 0.82 (95% CI, 0.72-0.89) for proportional change in 2D AP diameter, 0.80 (95% CI, 0.69-0.88) for proportional change in 3D AP diameter and 0.72 (95% CI, 0.56-0.83) for proportional change in hiatal area. The prevalence of major levator injury was 22.6%. The strength of correlation (r ) between ultrasound measurements and MOS score was 0.52 for 2D AP diameter, 0.62 for 3D AP diameter and 0.47 for hiatal area (P < 0.001 for all). On the ultrasound contraction scale, proportional change in 2D levator hiatal AP diameter of < 1% corresponds to absent, 2-14% to weak, 15-29% to normal and > 30% to strong contraction.
Ultrasound seems to be an objective and reliable method for evaluation of pelvic floor muscle contraction. Proportional change in 2D levator hiatal AP diameter had the highest ICC and moderate correlation with MOS score assessed by vaginal palpation, and we constructed an ultrasound scale for assessment of pelvic floor muscle contraction based on this measure. Copyright © 2019 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
确定盆腔底肌肉收缩的超声测量的组内和组间可靠性和一致性,并评估超声与阴道触诊之间的相关性。我们还旨在开发一种用于评估盆腔底肌肉收缩的超声量表。
这是一项对 195 名女性的横断面研究,她们计划接受压力性尿失禁(n=65)或脱垂(n=65)手术,或初产妇(n=65)。使用改良牛津量表(MOS)和二维/三维(2D/3D)经会阴超声对盆腔底肌肉收缩进行评估。2D 和 3D 提肛裂孔前后(AP)直径的比例变化以及 3D 提肛裂孔面积在休息和收缩之间的比例变化被用作盆腔底肌肉收缩的测量。一名评估者对存储的卷重复进行所有超声测量,用于组内可靠性和一致性分析,三名独立评估者对 60 个超声卷进行组间可靠性和一致性分析。使用组内相关系数(ICC)评估可靠性,使用 Bland-Altman 分析评估一致性。断层超声用于识别主要提肌损伤的女性。Spearman 秩相关系数(r)用于评估超声测量的盆腔底肌肉收缩与 MOS 评分之间的相关性。根据触诊将女性分配到肌肉收缩的每个类别(不存在、弱、中等或强)的比例来确定超声量表的截止值。
组内 ICC 为 0.81(95%CI,0.74-0.85),用于 2D 提肛裂孔 AP 直径的比例变化。组间 ICC 为 0.82(95%CI,0.72-0.89),用于 2D AP 直径的比例变化,0.80(95%CI,0.69-0.88)用于 3D AP 直径的比例变化,0.72(95%CI,0.56-0.83)用于裂孔面积的比例变化。主要提肌损伤的患病率为 22.6%。超声测量与 MOS 评分之间的相关性强度(r)为 0.52 用于 2D AP 直径,0.62 用于 3D AP 直径,0.47 用于裂孔面积(均<0.001)。在超声收缩量表上,2D 提肛裂孔 AP 直径的比例变化<1%对应于不存在,2-14%对应于弱,15-29%对应于正常,>30%对应于强收缩。
超声似乎是评估盆腔底肌肉收缩的一种客观和可靠的方法。2D 提肛裂孔 AP 直径的比例变化具有最高的 ICC,与阴道触诊评估的 MOS 评分具有中等相关性,我们基于此测量构建了一种用于评估盆腔底肌肉收缩的超声量表。版权所有©2019 ISUOG。由 John Wiley & Sons Ltd 出版。