Suppr超能文献

经阴道三维超声与磁共振成像测量静息状态下肛提肌裂孔的比较。

Comparison of translabial three-dimensional ultrasound with magnetic resonance imaging for measurement of levator hiatal biometry at rest.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016 May;47(5):636-41. doi: 10.1002/uog.14949.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare translabial three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the measurement of levator hiatal biometry at rest in women with pelvic organ prolapse, and to determine the interobserver reliability between two independent observers for ultrasound and MRI measurements.

METHODS

Data were derived from a multicenter prospective cohort study in which women scheduled for conventional anterior colporrhaphy underwent translabial 3D ultrasound and MRI prior to surgery. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated to estimate interobserver reliability between two independent observers and determine the agreement between ultrasound and MRI measurements. Bland-Altman plots were created to assess the agreement between ultrasound and MRI measurements.

RESULTS

Data from 139 women from nine hospitals were included in the study. The interobserver reliability of ultrasound assessment at rest, during Valsalva maneuver and during contraction and of MRI assessment at rest were moderate or good. The agreement between ultrasound and MRI for the measurement of levator hiatal biometry at rest was moderate, with ICCs of 0.52 (95%CI, 0.32-0.66) for levator hiatal area, 0.44 (95%CI, 0.21-0.60) for anteroposterior diameter and 0.44 (95%CI, 0.22-0.60) for transverse diameter. Levator hiatal biometry measurements were statistically significantly larger on MRI than on translabial 3D ultrasound.

CONCLUSIONS

The agreement between translabial 3D ultrasound and MRI for measurement of the levator hiatus at rest in women with pelvic organ prolapse was only moderate. The results of translabial 3D ultrasound and MRI should therefore not be used interchangeably in daily practice or in clinical research. Copyright © 2015 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

摘要

目的

比较经阴道三维(3D)超声与磁共振成像(MRI)在测量盆腔器官脱垂患者静息状态下肛提肌裂孔参数的应用,并评估两位独立观察者间超声和 MRI 测量结果的一致性。

方法

本研究为多中心前瞻性队列研究,纳入拟行传统经阴道前修补术的患者,术前均行经阴道 3D 超声和 MRI 检查。采用组内相关系数(ICC)评估两位独立观察者间的一致性,并比较超声和 MRI 测量结果的一致性。绘制 Bland-Altman 图评估超声和 MRI 测量结果的一致性。

结果

本研究共纳入 9 家医院的 139 例患者。超声检查在静息状态、Valsalva 动作、收缩状态下和 MRI 检查在静息状态下的观察者间可靠性为中度或高度可靠。MRI 和超声测量静息状态下肛提肌裂孔参数的一致性为中度,肛提肌裂孔面积、前后径和横径的 ICC 分别为 0.52(95%CI:0.32-0.66)、0.44(95%CI:0.21-0.60)和 0.44(95%CI:0.22-0.60)。MRI 测量的肛提肌裂孔参数显著大于超声。

结论

在测量盆腔器官脱垂患者静息状态下肛提肌裂孔参数时,经阴道 3D 超声与 MRI 之间的一致性仅为中度。因此,在日常实践或临床研究中,不应将两者的测量结果相互替换使用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验