Intensive Care Unit, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia; Intensive Care Unit, Mount Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Intensive Care Unit, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia; Intensive Care Unit, Mount Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia; University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia; Murdoch University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2019 Dec;108(6):1815-1821. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.04.114. Epub 2019 Jun 22.
When, and on whom, aspirin should be ceased before elective cardiac surgery is controversial. This study assessed the incidence of preoperative aspirin resistance and whether the quantitative antiplatelet effect of aspirin was associated with perioperative outcomes.
Aspirin-induced antiplatelet effect was measured by multiple electrode aggregometry in 250 adult cardiac surgical patients within 24 hours before surgery. Aspirin resistance was defined by a normal platelet function testing result for those who had continued taking aspirin until the day before the platelet function testing.
Aspirin resistance was observed in 16 (11.9%) patients (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.4-18.4). Of the 250 patients included, 75 (30%) required allogeneic blood product transfusion subsequently. Aspirin induced antiplatelet effect (odds ratio [OR], 0.991 per unit increment in the area under the curve on the platelet function testing, with a smaller area indicating more platelet inhibition; 95% CI, 0.982-0.999; P = .035), a higher EuroSCORE [European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation] II risk (OR, 1.184 per EuroSCORE II risk percentage increment; 95% CI, 1.017-1.379; P = .001), and a lower body mass index (OR, 0.926 per unit increment; 95% CI, 0.867-0.990; P = .024) were the only factors independently associated with requiring perioperative allogeneic blood product transfusion.
The degree of aspirin effect immediately before cardiac surgery was weakly associated with the risks of postoperative bleeding and allogeneic blood product transfusion, suggesting that measuring aspirin-induced antiplatelet effect before cardiac surgery may be useful as an adjunct in optimizing patient blood management for patients who are at high risk of bleeding and requiring allogeneic blood transfusion.
择期心脏手术前应何时停用阿司匹林,以及应停用于哪些患者,目前仍存在争议。本研究评估了术前阿司匹林抵抗的发生率,以及阿司匹林的定量抗血小板作用是否与围手术期结局相关。
在手术前 24 小时内,通过多电极聚集法对 250 名成年心脏手术患者的阿司匹林诱导抗血小板作用进行了测量。对于那些在血小板功能检测前一天仍继续服用阿司匹林的患者,如果血小板功能检测结果正常,则定义为阿司匹林抵抗。
在 250 名患者中,有 16 名(11.9%)患者出现阿司匹林抵抗(95%置信区间[CI]:7.4%18.4%)。在这 250 名患者中,有 75 名(30%)随后需要输注异体血液制品。阿司匹林诱导的抗血小板作用(比值比[OR]:血小板功能检测曲线下面积每增加 1 个单位,血小板抑制作用越强,面积越小;95%CI:0.9820.999;P=0.035)、更高的欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统 II 评分[EuroSCORE II](OR:每增加 1%EuroSCORE II 评分风险,风险增加 1.184;95%CI:1.0171.379;P=0.001)和更低的体重指数(OR:每增加 1 个单位,风险增加 0.926;95%CI:0.8670.990;P=0.024)是围手术期需要输注异体血液制品的唯一独立相关因素。
心脏手术前阿司匹林作用的程度与术后出血和输注异体血液制品的风险弱相关,提示在心脏手术前测量阿司匹林诱导的抗血小板作用可能有助于作为优化高出血风险和需要输注异体血液的患者血液管理的辅助手段。