Suppr超能文献

比较经会阴与经肛门超声检查肛门括约肌耐受性的初步研究。

Pilot study comparing tolerance of transperineal and endoanal ultrasound examination of anal sphincter.

作者信息

Hubka P, Švabík K, Mašata J, Martan A

出版信息

Ceska Gynekol. 2019 Winter;84(2):111-114.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare diagnostic possibilities of endoanal (EAUS) and transperineal (TPUS) ultrasound during anal sphincter examination and patients preferences.

DESIGN

Prospective study.

SETTING

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague.

METHODS

Patients involved had EAUS and TPUS of anal sphincter. First group were patients scheduled for control check after vaginal delivery complicated with anal sphincter injury (post OASI) and adequate suture. Second (control) group contained new patients coming for urogynecological examination with some symptoms of anal incontinence. Refusal were noted and after completing both ultrasounds patients marked on visual analog scale (VAS) the level of dyscomfort and answered few simple questions about their preference of exam in future.

RESULTS

This study contains twenty-nine patients (fifteen post OASI and fourteen in control group). Two patients (post OASI) refused EAUS and one patient from control group did not mark the level of dyscomfort. In post OASI group eleven patients (84.6%) considered EAUS as botherless or slighly bothering (VAS 3). The average dyscomfort for EAUS was 1.92 and for TPUS 1.08. Five patients marked EAUS more dyscomfortable as TPUS and this difference is significant (p < 0.05). In control group eleven patients (84.6%) marked EAUS as botherless or slightly bothering (VAS 3). There was no difference between post OASI and control group. We have not found by any exam residual anal sphincter defect in any patient post OASI. For this reason we could not decide about efectivity. In matter of future preference patients would prefer TPUS to EAUS in case of similar effectivity. However, in case of different effectivity patients would prefer the more effective.

CONCLUSION

Our patients prefer less dyscomfortable TPUS. The pilot study did not display higher effectivity of EAUS in diagnostics of residual anal sphincter defect.

摘要

目的

比较肛门内超声(EAUS)和经会阴超声(TPUS)在肛门括约肌检查中的诊断可能性以及患者的偏好。

设计

前瞻性研究。

地点

布拉格查理大学第一医学院妇产科及综合大学医院。

方法

纳入的患者接受了肛门括约肌的EAUS和TPUS检查。第一组为阴道分娩并发肛门括约肌损伤(产后肛门括约肌损伤)且已进行充分缝合的患者,计划进行对照检查。第二组(对照组)为因有肛门失禁症状前来接受泌尿妇科检查的新患者。记录拒绝情况,在完成两项超声检查后,患者用视觉模拟量表(VAS)标记不适程度,并回答几个关于他们未来对检查偏好的简单问题。

结果

本研究纳入了29名患者(15名产后肛门括约肌损伤患者和14名对照组患者)。两名产后肛门括约肌损伤患者拒绝接受EAUS检查,一名对照组患者未标记不适程度。在产后肛门括约肌损伤组中,11名患者(84.6%)认为EAUS无困扰或轻度困扰(VAS评分为3)。EAUS的平均不适评分为1.92,TPUS为1.08。5名患者认为EAUS比TPUS更不适,这种差异具有统计学意义(p<0.05)。在对照组中,11名患者(84.6%)认为EAUS无困扰或轻度困扰(VAS评分为3)。产后肛门括约肌损伤组和对照组之间无差异。我们在任何产后肛门括约肌损伤患者中均未通过任何检查发现残余肛门括约肌缺陷。因此,我们无法确定其有效性。在未来偏好方面,如果效果相似,患者更倾向于TPUS而非EAUS。然而,如果效果不同,患者会选择更有效的检查。

结论

我们的患者更喜欢不适程度较低的TPUS。该初步研究未显示EAUS在诊断残余肛门括约肌缺陷方面具有更高的有效性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验