Neurology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Institute of Diagnostic, Interventional and Pediatric Radiology and Department of Neurology, Inselspital, University Hospital Bern, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
J Neurointerv Surg. 2019 Dec;11(12):1174-1180. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014516. Epub 2019 Jun 25.
Performing mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in patients with basilar artery occlusion (BAO) is currently not evidence-based.
To compare patients' outcome, relative merits of achieving recanalization, and predictors of futile recanalization (FR) between BAO and anterior circulation large vessel occlusion (ACLVO) MT.
In the multicenter BEYOND-SWIFT registry (NCT03496064), univariate and multivariate (displayed as adjusted Odds Ratios, aOR and 95% confidence intervals, 95%-CI) outcome comparisons between BAO (N=165) and ACLVO (N=1574) were performed. The primary outcome was favorable outcome at 90 days (modified Rankin Scale, mRS 0-2). Secondary outcome included mortality, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) and FR. The relative merits of achieving successful recanalization between ACLVO and BAO were evaluated with interaction terms.
MT in BAO was more often technically effective and equally safe in regards to mortality and sICH when compared to ACLVO. When adjusting for baseline differences, there was no significant difference between BAO vs ACLVO regarding rates of favorable outcome (aOR 0.986, 95%-CI 0.553 - 1.758). However, BAO were associated with increased rates of FR (aOR 2.146, 95%-CI 1.267 - 3.633). Predictors for FR were age, stroke severity, maneuver count and intracranial stenting. No significant heterogeneity on the relative merits of achieving successful recanalization on several outcome parameters were observed when comparing BAO and ACLVO.
In selected patients, similar outcomes can be achieved in BAO and ACLVO patients treated with MT. Randomized controlled trials comparing patient selection and interventional strategies seem warranted to avoid FR.
NCT03496064.
目前,对基底动脉闭塞(BAO)患者进行机械取栓(MT)没有循证医学证据。
比较 BAO 和前循环大血管闭塞(ACLVO)MT 患者的预后、再通的相对益处和无效再通(FR)的预测因素。
在多中心 BEYOND-SWIFT 登记研究(NCT03496064)中,对 BAO(N=165)和 ACLVO(N=1574)患者进行了单变量和多变量(以调整后的优势比(aOR)和 95%置信区间(95%-CI)表示)预后比较。主要结局是 90 天时的良好结局(改良 Rankin 量表,mRS 0-2)。次要结局包括死亡率、症状性颅内出血(sICH)和 FR。通过交互项评估 ACLVO 和 BAO 之间实现成功再通的相对益处。
与 ACLVO 相比,BAO 的 MT 更常具有技术有效性,且在死亡率和 sICH 方面同样安全。在调整基线差异后,BAO 与 ACLVO 之间的良好结局率无显著差异(aOR 0.986,95%-CI 0.553 - 1.758)。然而,BAO 与 FR 发生率增加相关(aOR 2.146,95%-CI 1.267 - 3.633)。FR 的预测因素是年龄、卒中严重程度、操作次数和颅内支架置入。在比较 BAO 和 ACLVO 时,在几个结局参数上,实现成功再通的相对益处方面没有观察到显著的异质性。
在选择合适的患者中,BAO 和 ACLVO 患者接受 MT 治疗可获得相似的结局。比较患者选择和介入策略的随机对照试验似乎是必要的,以避免 FR。
NCT03496064。