Bhora Faiz, Ghosh Sudip K, Kassis Edmund, Yoo Andrew, Ramisetti Sushama, Johnston Stephen S, Rehmani Sadiq, Kalsekar Iftekhar
Health Quest Health System, Poughkeepsie, NY 12601, USA.
Global Health Economics and Market Access, Ethicon, Inc., Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2019 Jun 6;11:373-383. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S190644. eCollection 2019.
To assess whether tumor location during thoracic lobectomies affects economic outcomes or air leak complications. Retrospective, observational study using Premier Healthcare Database. The study included patients aged ≥18 years who underwent elective inpatient thoracic lobectomy for lung cancer between 2012 and 2014 (first qualifying=index admission). Three mutually exclusive tumor location groups were formed: upper lobe, middle lobe, and lower lobe. Primary outcomes were index admission's length of stay (LOS), total hospital costs, and operating room time; in-hospital air leak complications (composite of air leak/pneumothorax) served as an exploratory outcome. Multivariable models were used to examine the association between tumor location and the study outcomes, accounting for covariates and hospital-level clustering. 8,750 thoracic lobectomies were identified: upper lobe (n=5,284), middle lobe (n=512), and lower lobe (n=2,954). Compared with the upper lobe, the middle and lower lobe groups had statistically significant (<0.05): shorter adjusted LOS (7.0 days upper vs 5.8 days middle, 6.6 days lower), lower adjusted mean total hospital costs ($26,177 upper vs $23,109 middle, $24,557 lower), and lower adjusted odds of air leak complications (odds ratio middle vs upper=0.81, 95% CI=0.74-0.89; odds ratio lower vs upper=0.60, 95% CI=0.46-0.78). Findings were similar but varied in statistical significance when stratified by open and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery approach. Among patients undergoing elective thoracic lobectomy for lung cancer in real-world clinical practice, upper lobe tumors were significantly associated with increased in-hospital resource use and air leak complications as compared with lower or middle lobe tumors.
评估在胸段肺叶切除术中肿瘤位置是否会影响经济结果或漏气并发症。使用Premier医疗数据库进行回顾性观察研究。该研究纳入了2012年至2014年间因肺癌接受择期住院胸段肺叶切除术的年龄≥18岁的患者(首次符合条件=索引入院)。形成了三个相互排斥的肿瘤位置组:上叶、中叶和下叶。主要结局为索引入院的住院时间(LOS)、总住院费用和手术室时间;院内漏气并发症(漏气/气胸的综合情况)作为探索性结局。使用多变量模型来检验肿瘤位置与研究结局之间的关联,并考虑协变量和医院层面的聚类情况。共识别出8750例胸段肺叶切除术:上叶(n=5284)、中叶(n=512)和下叶(n=2954)。与上叶相比,中叶和下叶组在统计学上有显著差异(<0.05):调整后的住院时间更短(上叶7.0天,中叶5.8天,下叶6.6天),调整后的平均总住院费用更低(上叶26177美元,中叶23109美元,下叶24557美元),漏气并发症的调整后比值更低(中叶与上叶的比值比=0.81,95%CI=0.74-0.89;下叶与上叶的比值比=0.60,95%CI=0.46-0.78)。当按开放手术和电视辅助胸腔镜手术方法分层时,结果相似但在统计学意义上有所不同。在现实世界临床实践中接受择期胸段肺叶切除术治疗肺癌的患者中,与下叶或中叶肿瘤相比,上叶肿瘤与院内资源使用增加和漏气并发症显著相关。