Suppr超能文献

医疗补助初级保健费率提高对医疗补助保险妇女产前保健利用的影响。

Effect of the Medicaid Primary Care Rate Increase on Prenatal Care Utilization Among Medicaid-Insured Women.

机构信息

Department of Healthcare Policy and Research, Weill Cornell Medical College, 402 E. 67th Street, New York, NY, 10065, USA.

Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Department of Economics, Georgia State University, 14 Marietta Street NW, 30303, Atlanta, GA, USA.

出版信息

Matern Child Health J. 2019 Nov;23(11):1564-1572. doi: 10.1007/s10995-019-02804-6.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of the 2013-2014 ACA Medicaid Primary Care Rate Increase on Medicaid-insured women's prenatal care utilization, overall and by race and ethnicity.

METHODS

We employed a difference-in-differences design, using births data from the 2010-2014 National Vital Statistics System. Our study population included approximately 6.2 million births to Medicaid insured mothers conceived between April 2009 and March 2014. Our treatment group was births in states with large (relative to small) fee bump, defined as having Medicaid-to-Medicare fee ratio below the median of all states (0.7) in 2012. Our control group was births in states with a small fee bump. Prenatal care utilization measures included initiation of prenatal care in the first trimester and number of prenatal care visits.

RESULTS

Non-Hispanic Black women giving births in large fee bump states had 9% higher odds (95% CI 1.02, 1.17) of initiating prenatal care in the first trimester during the fee bump period, compared to small fee bump states. Prenatal care visits in this group also increased by 0.24 (95% CI 0.10, 0.39), 2.4% of the mean. A smaller increase in prenatal care visits of 0.17 (95% CI 0.00, 0.33) was found among non-Hispanic Whites. The fee bump had no impact among Hispanics or non-Hispanic women of other races.

CONCLUSIONS FOR PRACTICE

The Medicaid "fee bump" improved prenatal care utilization for non-Hispanic Black and White women. Policymakers may consider reinstating higher Medicaid reimbursements to improve access to care for disadvantaged populations.

摘要

目的

评估 2013-2014 年 ACA 医疗补助初级保健费率上调对医疗补助保险的女性产前保健利用的影响,总体上以及按种族和族裔划分。

方法

我们采用了差异中的差异设计,使用了 2010-2014 年国家生命统计系统的出生数据。我们的研究人群包括大约 620 万在 2009 年 4 月至 2014 年 3 月期间由 Medicaid 保险的母亲怀孕的出生。我们的治疗组是在有较大(相对于较小)费用增长的州出生的婴儿,这一定义为 2012 年 Medicaid 与 Medicare 费用比率低于所有州中位数(0.7)的州。我们的对照组是在费用增长较小的州出生的婴儿。产前保健利用的衡量标准包括在第一孕期开始产前保健以及产前保健访问次数。

结果

在费用增长较大的州出生的非西班牙裔黑人女性,在费用增长期间,在第一孕期开始产前保健的可能性高 9%(95%CI 1.02,1.17),与费用增长较小的州相比。该组的产前保健访问次数也增加了 0.24(95%CI 0.10,0.39),占平均值的 2.4%。非西班牙裔白人的产前保健访问量增加了较小的 0.17(95%CI 0.00,0.33)。西班牙裔或其他种族的非西班牙裔女性中,费用增长没有影响。

结论

医疗补助“费用增长”提高了非西班牙裔黑人和白人女性的产前保健利用率。政策制定者可能会考虑恢复更高的 Medicaid 报销,以改善弱势人群的获得护理的机会。

相似文献

1
Effect of the Medicaid Primary Care Rate Increase on Prenatal Care Utilization Among Medicaid-Insured Women.
Matern Child Health J. 2019 Nov;23(11):1564-1572. doi: 10.1007/s10995-019-02804-6.
4
The Effect of Medicaid Physician Fee Increases on Health Care Access, Utilization, and Expenditures.
Health Serv Res. 2018 Apr;53(2):690-710. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12698. Epub 2017 Apr 16.
5
Medicaid reimbursement, prenatal care and infant health.
J Health Econ. 2015 Dec;44:10-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2015.08.008. Epub 2015 Aug 24.
6
The Differential Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Prenatal Care Utilization Among US Women by Medicaid Expansion and Race and Ethnicity.
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2023;29(4):E137-E146. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000001698. Epub 2022 Dec 7.
8
No Association Found Between The Medicaid Primary Care Fee Bump And Physician-Reported Participation In Medicaid.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2018 Jul;37(7):1092-1098. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.0078.
9
Expanding Medicaid Access without Expanding Medicaid: Why Did Some Nonexpansion States Continue the Primary Care Fee Bump?
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2018 Feb 1;43(1):109-127. doi: 10.1215/03616878-4249861.
10
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Utilization of Tonsillectomy among Medicaid-Insured Children.
J Pediatr. 2021 Jun;233:191-197.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2021.01.071. Epub 2021 Feb 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Did the Affordable Care Act Promote Racial Equity in Pregnancy-Related Health? A Scoping Review.
Popul Health Manag. 2024 Jun;27(3):206-215. doi: 10.1089/pop.2023.0248. Epub 2024 Apr 4.
2
Medicaid physician fees and the use of primary care services: evidence from before and after the ACA fee bump.
Int J Health Econ Manag. 2023 Dec;23(4):609-642. doi: 10.1007/s10754-023-09358-9. Epub 2023 Jun 16.
3
Geographic Variation In Medicare Per Capita Spending Narrowed From 2007 To 2017.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 Nov;39(11):1875-1882. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2020.00188.

本文引用的文献

1
Declining Medicaid Fees and Primary Care Appointment Availability for New Medicaid Patients.
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Jan 1;178(1):145-146. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.6302.
2
Does Maternity Care Coordination Influence Perinatal Health Care Utilization? Evidence from North Carolina.
Health Serv Res. 2018 Aug;53(4):2368-2383. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12742. Epub 2017 Jul 20.
4
Anatomy of Good Prenatal Care: Perspectives of Low Income African-American Women on Barriers and Facilitators to Prenatal Care.
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2017 Feb;4(1):79-86. doi: 10.1007/s40615-015-0204-x. Epub 2016 Jan 28.
5
Statewide Medicaid Enhanced Prenatal Care Programs and Infant Mortality.
Pediatrics. 2015 Aug;136(2):334-42. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-0479. Epub 2015 Jul 6.
6
Appointment availability after increases in Medicaid payments for primary care.
N Engl J Med. 2015 Feb 5;372(6):537-45. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1413299. Epub 2015 Jan 21.
7
Methods for evaluating changes in health care policy: the difference-in-differences approach.
JAMA. 2014 Dec 10;312(22):2401-2. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.16153.
8
To extend or not to extend the primary care "fee bump" in Medicaid?
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2014 Dec;39(6):1263-75. doi: 10.1215/03616878-2829495. Epub 2014 Sep 23.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验