Suppr超能文献

评估《患者保护与平价医疗法案》对双重保险受益人的初级保健费用和获得医疗服务的影响。

Assessment of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act's Increase in Fees for Primary Care and Access to Care for Dual-Eligible Beneficiaries.

机构信息

Mongan Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.

Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jan 4;4(1):e2033424. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.33424.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) temporarily increased primary care practitioners' (PCP) Medicaid fees to that of Medicare for 2013 to 2014 (fee bump) to help accommodate potential increases in demand for care with ACA coverage expansion. This also increased fees for PCPs treating dual-eligible Medicare and Medicaid beneficiaries in many states and eliminated payment differentials for dual-eligible vs non-dual-eligible Medicare beneficiaries that could limit access to care.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the association between the ACA fee bump and primary care visits for dual-eligible Medicare and Medicaid beneficiaries.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cohort study used a difference-in-difference design and Medicare claims data from 2012 to 2016 to compare changes in visit rates for full-subsidy dual-eligible Medicare and Medicaid beneficiaries vs non-dual-eligible Medicare beneficiaries with low income whose fees did not change. Changes were examined overall and separately in states with temporary, extended, or minimal fee increases for dual-eligible vs non-dual-eligible beneficiaries in 2013 to 2014 (mandatory bump) and 2015 to 2016 (postbump or bump extension) vs 2012 (prebump). The study used linear regression models with beneficiary fixed effects, adjusting for time-changing area and beneficiary characteristics. Statistical analysis was performed from February 2018 to November 2019.

EXPOSURE

ACA-mandated Medicaid fee bump.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Primary care visits per 100 beneficiaries overall and visits billed by physicians vs nurse practitioners and physician assistants.

RESULTS

The study included 3 052 044 dual-eligible and non-dual-eligible beneficiaries in 2012; 1 516 534 (49.7%) were aged 65 years or younger, 1 797 556 (58.9%) were women, and 1 754 626 (57.5%) had non-Hispanic White race/ethnicity. Overall primary care visit rates for dual-eligible beneficiaries were unchanged or decreased slightly relative to non-dual-eligible beneficiaries during the fee bump (2013-2014) and the postbump or bump extension period (2015-2016) vs baseline. Compared with non-dual-eligible beneficiaries, visit rates with primary care physicians declined more uniformly for dual-eligible beneficiaries across state groups and time periods (difference-in-difference: -0.37 [95% CI, -0.43 to -0.32] visits per 100 beneficiaries in 2013-2014 vs 2012; P < .001; and difference-in-difference: -0.62 [95% CI, -0.68 to -0.56] visits per 100 beneficiaries in 2015-2016 vs 2012; P < .001), whereas visits with nurse practitioners and physician assistants increased over time (difference-in-difference: 0.11 [95% CI, 0.08 to 0.14] visits per 100 beneficiaries in 2013-2014 vs 2012; P < .001; and difference-in-difference: 0.46 [95% CI, 0.43 to 0.50] visits per 100 beneficiaries in 2015-2016 vs 2012; P < .001). These changes, however, were not associated with the timing of the payment changes.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The ACA fee bump was not associated with increases in primary care visits for dual-eligible Medicare and Medicaid beneficiaries. Visits for dual-eligible beneficiaries with primary care physicians decreased after the ACA, a decrease that was partially offset by increases in visits with nonphysician clinicians.

摘要

重要性

《患者保护与平价医疗法案》(ACA)暂时将初级保健医生(PCP)的 Medicaid 费用提高到 Medicare 的水平,以适应 ACA 扩大保险范围后对医疗服务需求的潜在增加。这也增加了许多州中同时享受 Medicare 和 Medicaid 福利的双重合格者的 PCP 费用,并消除了对双重合格者与非双重合格者 Medicare 受益人的支付差异,这可能会限制获得医疗服务的机会。

目的

研究 ACA 费用增加与同时享受 Medicare 和 Medicaid 福利的双重合格者的初级保健就诊之间的关系。

设计、地点和参与者:这项队列研究使用了差异中的差异设计和 2012 年至 2016 年的 Medicare 索赔数据,比较了全额补贴的双重合格的 Medicare 和 Medicaid 受益人与收入较低且费用不变的非双重合格的 Medicare 受益人的就诊率变化。变化情况总体上进行了检查,并在 2013 年至 2014 年(强制性增加)和 2015 年至 2016 年(后续增加或增加延长)与 2012 年(增加前)相比,在各州中按时间变化的地区和受益人的特征,对双重合格者与非双重合格者受益人的访问率进行了单独比较。该研究使用了受益人的固定效应线性回归模型,并进行了调整。统计分析于 2018 年 2 月至 2019 年 11 月进行。

暴露

ACA 授权的 Medicaid 费用增加。

主要结果和措施

总体而言,每位受益人的初级保健就诊次数以及医生与护士从业者和医师助理开具的就诊次数。

结果

该研究纳入了 2012 年的 3052044 名双重合格和非双重合格的受益人;1516534 名(49.7%)年龄在 65 岁或以下,1797556 名(58.9%)为女性,1754626 名(57.5%)为非西班牙裔白人种族/民族。与非双重合格的受益人相比,在费用增加期间(2013-2014 年)和后续增加或增加延长期间(2015-2016 年),双重合格的受益人的整体初级保健就诊率保持不变或略有下降。与非双重合格的受益人相比,在各个州组和时间段内,双重合格受益人的初级保健医生就诊率下降更为一致(差异中的差异:2013-2014 年与 2012 年相比,每位受益人的就诊次数减少 0.37 [95% CI,0.43 至 0.32];P<.001;差异中的差异:2015-2016 年与 2012 年相比,每位受益人的就诊次数减少 0.62 [95% CI,0.68 至 0.56];P<.001),而护士从业者和医师助理的就诊次数则随着时间的推移而增加(差异中的差异:2013-2014 年与 2012 年相比,每位受益人的就诊次数增加 0.11 [95% CI,0.08 至 0.14];P<.001;差异中的差异:2015-2016 年与 2012 年相比,每位受益人的就诊次数增加 0.46 [95% CI,0.43 至 0.50];P<.001)。然而,这些变化与支付变化的时间无关。

结论和相关性

ACA 费用增加与同时享受 Medicare 和 Medicaid 福利的双重合格者的初级保健就诊次数增加无关。ACA 之后,双重合格受益人的初级保健医生就诊次数减少,而与非医生临床医生的就诊次数增加部分抵消了这一减少。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac41/7821030/f38d0ab157b9/jamanetwopen-e2033424-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验