Suppr超能文献

精神卫生保健规划中共同设计软件的试点实施:对员工观点的定性评估。

Pilot implementation of co-designed software for co-production in mental health care planning: a qualitative evaluation of staff perspectives.

机构信息

Centre for Academic Primary Care, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol , Bristol , UK.

National Institute for Health Research Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (NIHR CLAHRC) West at University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust , Bristol , UK.

出版信息

J Ment Health. 2019 Oct;28(5):495-504. doi: 10.1080/09638237.2019.1608925. Epub 2019 Jun 26.

Abstract

Mental health policies advocate service user participation in care planning. However, service users often feel they're not fully involved and direct access to users' own electronic care plans in the community can be an obstacle. To address this, an electronic care pathway tool (CPT) was co-designed by service users, staff and software developers, to facilitate co-production of care and crisis plans. To investigate the feasibility and acceptability of the pilot implementation of the CPT in professionals' practice to co-produce care plans and enable efficient working. Qualitative interviews with fifteen mental health practitioners, and five service development/management staff. Normalisation process theory, which outlines the social processes involved in implementing technology, and co-production theory, informed interviews and data analysis. Multiple factors influenced CPT usage, including people's views of technology, practitioners' relationships with service users, service users' mental health needs, and their capacity for reflective thinking. The CPT's visual and interactive features could enable co-production of care plans. The CPT supported practitioners' efficiency, but its features did not easily streamline with electronic patient records. CPT interactive touchpoints supported service users' therapeutic reflection and facilitated care planning involvement. Information technology system interoperability was an obstacle.

摘要

心理健康政策提倡服务使用者参与护理计划。然而,服务使用者常常感到自己没有被充分参与,而直接访问社区中用户自己的电子护理计划可能是一个障碍。为了解决这个问题,服务使用者、工作人员和软件开发人员共同设计了一种电子护理途径工具(CPT),以促进护理和危机计划的共同制定。 研究 CPT 在专业人员实践中的试点实施以共同制定护理计划并实现高效工作的可行性和可接受性。 对 15 名心理健康从业者和 5 名服务开发/管理人员进行了定性访谈。规范化进程理论,概述了实施技术所涉及的社会过程,以及共同生产理论,为访谈和数据分析提供了信息。 多种因素影响 CPT 的使用,包括人们对技术的看法、从业者与服务使用者的关系、服务使用者的心理健康需求以及他们进行反思性思维的能力。CPT 的可视化和交互功能可以支持护理计划的共同制定。CPT 支持了从业者的效率,但它的功能与电子病历不易集成。 CPT 的交互接触点支持服务使用者的治疗反思,并促进护理计划的参与。信息技术系统的互操作性是一个障碍。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验