Suppr超能文献

特定病原体:非细菌革兰氏类型:驱动脓毒症休克中的炎症反应。

The Specific Organism: Not Bacterial Gram Type: Drives the Inflammatory Response in Septic Shock.

作者信息

Linder Adam, Fjell Chris D, Inghammar Malin, Hsu Joseph, Walley Keith R, Boyd John H, Russell James A

机构信息

Division of Infection Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden,

Centre for Heart Lung Innovation and Division of Critical Care Medicine, St. Paul's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

出版信息

J Innate Immun. 2020;12(2):182-190. doi: 10.1159/000500418. Epub 2019 Jun 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS

The inflammatory response was targeted by unsuccessful therapies but ignored pathogen. We hypothesized that the inflammatory response differs according to organism in human septic shock.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We measured 39 cytokines at baseline and 24 h in patients (n = 363) in the Vasopressin and Septic Shock Trial (VASST). We compared cytokine profiles (cytokine functional class) at baseline and at 24 h by organism and used hierarchical clustering to classify cytokines according to 28-day outcomes.

RESULTS

In 363 patients, 88 and 176 patients had at least 1 species isolated from blood and other sites, respectively. Cytokine levels differed significantly according to organism: Neisseria meningitidis and Streptococcus pneumoniae had the highest (baseline and at 24 h), while Enterococcus faecalis (blood) had the lowest mean cytokine levels. N. meningitidis and Klebsiella pneumoniae had significantly higher cytokine levels at baseline versus 24 h (p = 0.01 and 0.02, respectively); E. faecalis had significantly higher cytokine levels at 24 h versus baseline. Hierarchical clustering heat maps showed that pathogens elicited similar cytokine responses not related to the functional cytokine class.

CONCLUSION

The organism type induces different cytokine profiles in septic shock. Specific gram-positive and gram-negative pathogens stimulated similar plasma cytokine-level patterns.

摘要

背景与假设

炎症反应是未成功治疗的靶点,但病原体却被忽视。我们假设在人类脓毒性休克中,炎症反应因病原体不同而存在差异。

材料与方法

在血管加压素与脓毒性休克试验(VASST)中,我们对363例患者在基线期和24小时时的39种细胞因子进行了检测。我们根据病原体比较了基线期和24小时时的细胞因子谱(细胞因子功能类别),并使用层次聚类法根据28天的预后对细胞因子进行分类。

结果

在363例患者中,分别有88例和176例患者至少从血液和其他部位分离出1种病原体。细胞因子水平因病原体不同而有显著差异:脑膜炎奈瑟菌和肺炎链球菌的细胞因子水平最高(基线期和24小时时),而粪肠球菌(血液中)的平均细胞因子水平最低。脑膜炎奈瑟菌和肺炎克雷伯菌在基线期的细胞因子水平显著高于24小时时(分别为p = 0.01和0.02);粪肠球菌在24小时时的细胞因子水平显著高于基线期。层次聚类热图显示,病原体引发的细胞因子反应相似,与细胞因子功能类别无关。

结论

病原体类型在脓毒性休克中诱导不同的细胞因子谱。特定的革兰氏阳性和革兰氏阴性病原体刺激相似的血浆细胞因子水平模式。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

1
Disentangling the phenotypic patterns of hypertension and chronic hypotension.解析高血压和慢性低血压的表型模式。
J Biomed Inform. 2024 Nov;159:104743. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2024.104743. Epub 2024 Oct 31.
2
Some Like It Hot.热情似火。
J Innate Immun. 2021;13(6):321-322. doi: 10.1159/000520270. Epub 2021 Oct 26.
3
C-Reactive Protein: More than a Biomarker.C反应蛋白:不止是一种生物标志物。
J Innate Immun. 2021;13(5):257-258. doi: 10.1159/000519091. Epub 2021 Sep 1.
5
Serious, Severe, Sepsis.严重、重度、脓毒症。
J Innate Immun. 2020;12(2):129-130. doi: 10.1159/000505623. Epub 2020 Jan 31.

本文引用的文献

5
Toll-like receptors and opportunities for new sepsis therapeutics. toll 样受体与脓毒症新疗法的机遇
Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2012 Oct;14(5):455-61. doi: 10.1007/s11908-012-0273-5.
10
New method of classifying infections in critically ill patients.危重症患者感染分类的新方法。
Crit Care Med. 2004 Jul;32(7):1510-26. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000129973.13104.2d.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验