• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会政策与职业自身利益:医生对诊断相关分组的反应

Social policy and professional self-interest: physician responses to DRGs.

作者信息

Notman M, Howe K R, Rittenberg W, Bridgham R, Holmes M M, Rovner D R

机构信息

Department of Anthropology, University of Colorado, Boulder.

出版信息

Soc Sci Med. 1987;25(12):1259-67. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(87)90124-9.

DOI:10.1016/0277-9536(87)90124-9
PMID:3124271
Abstract

Prospective hospital reimbursement based on Diagnosis Related Groups (DRGs) began in 1983 for Medicare patients, and many states are adopting similar systems for Medicaid recipients in an attempt to curb rising health care costs. Because of their unprecedented intrusiveness compared to previous cost-containment measures and because they explicitly introduce financial incentives to reduce services, DRGs have great potential to affect health care delivery. To determine the effects of DRGs on hospitals and physicians, six months of ethnographic fieldwork was carried out on the medicine and pediatrics services of a university-affiliated hospital during the first year of DRG-based reimbursement. Observations and interviews were used to discern institutional responses to DRGs and physician knowledge of, experience with, and reactions to this cost-containment effort. Our findings indicate that the hospital instituted many changes to protect its interests. Data gathered from patients' abstracts suggest providers are successfully dealing with the new system; the average length of stay for Medicare patients was reduced by 38% in the first year of prospective reimbursement, compared with a 15% reduction for other patients (P less than 0.05). As a group, the physicians made no organized effort to educate themselves about the new cost-containment regulations. Their knowledge of DRGs was vague and included many misconceptions. Their response was not a coherent one taking broad social concerns into account. Cost-containment was viewed negatively, as a threat to the financial integrity of the hospital, patient care, and professional autonomy.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

基于诊断相关分组(DRGs)的前瞻性医院报销制度于1983年开始用于医疗保险患者,许多州也在为医疗补助接受者采用类似制度,试图遏制不断上涨的医疗费用。与以往的成本控制措施相比,DRGs具有前所未有的侵扰性,而且它们明确引入了减少服务的经济激励措施,因此对医疗服务的提供有很大影响。为了确定DRGs对医院和医生的影响,在基于DRG报销的第一年,对一家大学附属医院的内科和儿科服务进行了为期六个月的人种志实地研究。通过观察和访谈来了解机构对DRGs的反应以及医生对这种成本控制措施的了解、经验和反应。我们的研究结果表明,医院进行了许多变革以保护自身利益。从患者摘要中收集的数据表明,医疗服务提供者正在成功应对新系统;在前瞻性报销的第一年,医疗保险患者的平均住院时间减少了38%,而其他患者减少了15%(P小于0.05)。总体而言,医生们没有做出有组织的努力来了解新的成本控制规定。他们对DRGs的了解很模糊,还存在许多误解。他们的反应并非考虑到广泛社会关切的连贯反应。成本控制被视为负面因素,是对医院财务状况、患者护理和专业自主权的威胁。(摘要截选至250词)

相似文献

1
Social policy and professional self-interest: physician responses to DRGs.社会政策与职业自身利益:医生对诊断相关分组的反应
Soc Sci Med. 1987;25(12):1259-67. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(87)90124-9.
2
Cost containment (DRGs): a new source for litigation?成本控制(诊断相关分组):诉讼的新源头?
Health Matrix. 1985 Summer;3(2):24-7.
3
DRG prospective, "all payor systems," financial risk, and hospital cost in pulmonary medicine non CC stratified DRGs.肺科非复杂并发症分层诊断相关分组中的诊断相关分组前瞻性、“所有支付方系统”、财务风险和医院成本
Chest. 1988 Oct;94(4):855-61. doi: 10.1378/chest.94.4.855.
4
Interhospital differences in severity of illness. Problems for prospective payment based on diagnosis-related groups (DRGs).医院间疾病严重程度的差异。基于诊断相关分组(DRGs)的前瞻性支付存在的问题。
N Engl J Med. 1985 Jul 4;313(1):20-4. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198507043130105.
5
Medicare program; changes to the hospital inpatient prospective payment systems and fiscal year 2007 rates; fiscal year 2007 occupational mix adjustment to wage index; health care infrastructure improvement program; selection criteria of loan program for qualifying hospitals engaged in cancer-related health care and forgiveness of indebtedness; and exclusion of vendor purchases made under the competitive acquisition program (CAP) for outpatient drugs and biologicals under part B for the purpose of calculating the average sales price (ASP). Final rules and interim final rule with comment period.医疗保险计划;医院 inpatient 预期支付系统及 2007 财年费率的变更;2007 财年工资指数的职业构成调整;医疗保健基础设施改善计划;参与癌症相关医疗保健的合格医院贷款计划的选择标准及债务免除;以及在计算平均销售价格(ASP)时排除根据 B 部分门诊药品和生物制品的竞争性采购计划(CAP)进行的供应商采购。最终规则及有意见征求期的暂行最终规则。
Fed Regist. 2006 Aug 18;71(160):47869-8351.
6
Financial risk and hospital cost in stratified, peripheral vascular surgical DRGs without complications and comorbidities.无并发症和合并症的分层外周血管外科诊断相关分组中的财务风险和医院成本
Ann Vasc Surg. 1989 Apr;3(2):170-6. doi: 10.1016/S0890-5096(06)62012-8.
7
Payment systems and considerations of case mix--are diagnosis-related groups applicable in Japan?支付系统与病例组合考量——诊断相关分组在日本适用吗?
Pharmacoeconomics. 2000;18 Suppl 1:95-110. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200018001-00012.
8
Cost containment in medicine: why cardiology?医学中的成本控制:为何是心脏病学?
Am J Cardiol. 1985 Aug 23;56(5):10C-15C. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(85)80003-5.
9
Structure and performance of different DRG classification systems for neonatal medicine.新生儿医学不同疾病诊断相关分组(DRG)分类系统的结构与性能
Pediatrics. 1999 Jan;103(1 Suppl E):302-18.
10
Impact of the DRG-based reimbursement system on patient care and professional practise: perspectives of Swiss hospital physicians.基于疾病诊断相关分组(DRG)的报销系统对患者护理和专业实践的影响:瑞士医院医生的观点
Swiss Med Wkly. 2015 Feb 9;145:w14080. doi: 10.4414/smw.2015.14080. eCollection 2015.

引用本文的文献

1
Challenges and Adverse Outcomes of Implementing Reimbursement Mechanisms Based on the Diagnosis-Related Group Classification System: A systematic review.基于诊断相关分组分类系统实施报销机制的挑战与不良后果:一项系统综述
Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2020 Aug;20(3):e260-e270. doi: 10.18295/squmj.2020.20.03.004. Epub 2020 Oct 5.