the University of New South Wales, Liverpool Hospital Mental Health Centre Level 1, Liverpool, NSW, 2170, Australia.
South Western Sydney Local Health District, Health Services Building Level 3, Cnr Campbell & Goulburn St, Liverpool, NSW, 2170, Australia.
BMC Public Health. 2019 Jun 27;19(1):812. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7183-5.
Children from refugee backgrounds are less likely to access appropriate health and social care than non-refugee children. Our aim was to identify refugee children's health/wellbeing strengths and needs, and the barriers and enablers to accessing services while preparing for primary and secondary school, in a low socio-economic multicultural community in Australia.
Ten focus groups were facilitated with Arabic-speaking refugee parents of children aged 2-5 years (n = 11) or in first year secondary school (n = 22); refugee adolescents starting high school (n = 16); and key service providers to refugee families (n = 27). Vignettes about a healthy child and a child with difficulties guided the discussions. Data was thematically analysed and feedback sought from the community via the World Café method.
Personal resilience and strong family systems were identified as strengths. Mental health was identified as a complex primary need; and whilst refugees were aware of available services, there were issues in knowing how to access them. Opportunities for play/socialisation were recognised as unmet adolescent needs. Adults spoke of a need to support integration of "old" and "new" cultural values. Parents identified community as facilitating health knowledge transfer for new arrivals; whilst stakeholders saw this as a barrier when systems change. Most parents had not heard of early childhood services, and reported difficulty accessing child healthcare. Preschooler parents identified the family "GP" as the main source of health support; whilst parents of adolescents valued their child's school. Health communication in written (not spoken) English was a significant roadblock. Differences in refugee family and service provider perceptions were also evident.
Refugee families face challenges to accessing services, but also have strengths that enable them to optimise their children's wellbeing. Culturally-tailored models of care embedded within GP services and school systems may assist improved healthcare for refugee families.
与非难民儿童相比,难民背景的儿童获得适当的医疗和社会保健服务的可能性较低。我们的目的是在澳大利亚一个社会经济文化多元的低水平社区中,确定难民儿童在准备上小学和中学时的健康/福利优势和需求,以及他们在获得服务时面临的障碍和促进因素。
用阿拉伯语与 2-5 岁儿童的难民父母(n=11)或刚上中学一年级的难民儿童(n=22)、开始上高中的难民青少年(n=16)以及为难民家庭提供服务的主要提供者进行了 10 次焦点小组讨论;讨论围绕一个健康儿童和一个有困难的儿童的情况展开。对数据进行了主题分析,并通过世界咖啡馆的方法向社区征求反馈意见。
个人适应能力和强大的家庭系统被认为是优势。心理健康被认为是一个复杂的基本需求;尽管难民了解可用的服务,但在如何获得这些服务方面存在问题。为青少年提供的娱乐/社交机会被认为是未满足的需求。成年人提到需要支持融合“旧”和“新”文化价值观。父母认为社区有助于为新来者传递健康知识;而利益相关者则认为这是系统变革的一个障碍。大多数家长都没有听说过幼儿服务,而且报告说难以获得儿童保健。幼儿家长认为家庭的“家庭医生”是主要的健康支持来源;而青少年的家长则重视孩子的学校。以书面(而非口头)英语进行的健康沟通是一个重大障碍。难民家庭和服务提供者的看法也存在差异。
难民家庭在获得服务方面面临挑战,但他们也有优势,可以使他们的孩子的幸福感最大化。嵌入在全科医生服务和学校系统中的、针对难民家庭的文化定制的护理模式可能有助于改善难民家庭的医疗保健。