Suppr超能文献

防御性医疗行为的触发因素:荷兰医生的横断面研究。

Triggers of defensive medical behaviours: a cross-sectional study among physicians in the Netherlands.

机构信息

Department of Operations, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Department of Health Services Management & Organisation, Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2019 Jun 25;9(6):e025108. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025108.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study investigated whether the attitudes of physicians towards justified and unjustified litigation, and their perception of patient pressure in demanding care, influence their use of defensive medical behaviours.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional survey using exploratory factor analysis was conducted to determine litigation attitude and perceived patient pressure factors. Regression analyses were used to regress these factors on to the ordering of extra tests or procedures (defensive assurance behaviour) or the avoidance of high-risk patients or procedures (defensive avoidance behaviour).

SETTING

Data were collected from eight Dutch hospitals.

PARTICIPANTS

Respondents were 160 physicians and 54 residents (response rate 25%) of the hospital departments of (1) anaesthesiology, (2) colon, stomach and liver diseases, (3) gynaecology, (4) internal medicine, (5) neurology and (6) surgery.

PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES

Respondents' application of defensive assurance and avoidance behaviours.

RESULTS

'Disapproval of justified litigation' and 'Concerns about unjustified litigation' were positively related to both assurance (β=0.21, p<0.01, and β=0.28, p<0.001, respectively) and avoidance (β=0.16, p<0.05, and β=0.18, p<0.05, respectively) behaviours. 'Self-blame for justified litigation' was not significantly related to both defensive behaviours. Perceived patient pressures to refer (β=0.18, p<0.05) and to prescribe medicine (β=0.23, p<0.01) had direct positive relationships with assurance behaviour, whereas perceived patient pressure to prescribe medicine was also positively related to avoidance behaviour (β=0.14, p<0.05). No difference was found between physicians and residents in their defensive medical behaviour.

CONCLUSIONS

Physicians adopted more defensive medical behaviours if they had stronger thoughts and emotions towards (un)justified litigation. Further, physicians should be aware that perceived patient pressure for care can lead to them adopting defensive behaviours that negatively affects the quality and safety of patient care.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨医生对合理和不合理诉讼的态度,以及他们对患者要求医疗服务的压力的看法,是否会影响其采取防御性医疗行为。

设计

采用探索性因子分析进行横断面调查,以确定诉讼态度和感知患者压力因素。回归分析用于将这些因素回归到额外测试或程序的订单(防御性保证行为)或避免高风险患者或程序(防御性回避行为)上。

设置

数据来自荷兰的 8 家医院。

参与者

(1)麻醉科、(2)结肠、胃和肝病科、(3)妇科、(4)内科、(5)神经科和(6)外科的 160 名医生和 54 名住院医师(应答率为 25%)参加了研究。

主要结局测量指标

受访者应用防御性保证和回避行为。

结果

“不赞成合理诉讼”和“对不合理诉讼的担忧”与保证行为(β=0.21,p<0.01 和 β=0.28,p<0.001)和回避行为(β=0.16,p<0.05 和 β=0.18,p<0.05)均呈正相关。“对合理诉讼的自责”与两种防御行为均无显著关系。感知到的患者转诊压力(β=0.18,p<0.05)和开处方压力(β=0.23,p<0.01)与保证行为呈直接正相关,而感知到的患者开处方压力也与回避行为呈正相关(β=0.14,p<0.05)。医生和住院医师在防御性医疗行为方面没有差异。

结论

如果医生对(不)合理诉讼有更强烈的想法和情绪,他们会采取更多的防御性医疗行为。此外,医生应该意识到,患者对医疗服务的压力可能会导致他们采取防御性行为,从而对患者护理的质量和安全产生负面影响。

相似文献

5
Are neurology residents in the United States being taught defensive medicine?美国的神经科住院医师是否被传授了防御性医疗知识?
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2006 Jun;108(4):374-7. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2005.05.013. Epub 2005 Jul 22.

本文引用的文献

8
Malpractice lawsuits and change in work in Japanese surgeons.日本外科医生的医疗事故诉讼和工作变化。
J Surg Res. 2015 Jan;193(1):210-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2014.08.029. Epub 2014 Aug 22.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验