Suppr超能文献

英国功能评估量表在英国国家临床数据库创伤性脑损伤患者样本中的 Rasch 分析。

Rasch analysis of the UK Functional Assessment Measure in a sample of patients with traumatic brain injury from the UK national clinical database.

机构信息

Director, UK Rehabilitation Outcomes Collaborative, Northwick Park Hospital and King's College London, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Rehabil Med. 2019 Sep 3;51(8):566-574. doi: 10.2340/16501977-2580.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether the UK Functional Assessment Measure (UK FIM+FAM) fits the Rasch model in patients with complex disability following traumatic brain injury.

DESIGN

Psychometric evaluation including preliminary exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses followed by Rasch analysis.

PARTICIPANTS

A multicentre UK national cohort of 1,956 patients admitted for specialist rehabilitation following traumatic brain injury.

RESULTS

The suitability of the Partial Credit Model was confirmed by the likelihood-ratio test (χ2 (df86) =7,325.0, p < 0.001). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses supported 3 factors (Motor, Communication, Psychosocial). Rasch analysis of the full scale incorporating the 3 factors as super-items resulted in an acceptable overall model fit (χ2 (df24)=36.72, p = 0.05) and strict uni-dimensionality when tested on a sub-sample of n = 320. These results were replicated in a full sample (n = 1,956) showing uni-dimensionality and good reliability with Person Separation Index = 0.81, but item trait interaction was significant due to the large sample size. No significant differential item functioning was observed for any personal factors. Neither uniform re-scoring of items nor exclusion of participants with extreme scores improved the model fit.

CONCLUSION

The UK FIM+FAM scale satisfies the Rasch model reasonably in traumatic brain injury. A conversion table was produced, but its usefulness in clinical practice requires further exploration and clinical translation.

摘要

目的

确定 UK Functional Assessment Measure(UK FIM+FAM)是否适用于创伤性脑损伤后复杂残疾患者。

设计

包括初步探索性和验证性因子分析,然后进行 Rasch 分析的心理计量学评估。

参与者

一项来自英国的多中心研究,纳入了 1956 名因创伤性脑损伤接受专科康复治疗的患者。

结果

似然比检验(χ2(df86)=7325.0,p<0.001)证实了部分信用模型的适宜性。探索性和验证性因子分析支持 3 个因素(运动、沟通、心理社会)。将 3 个因素作为超项纳入全量表的 Rasch 分析得出了可接受的总体模型拟合度(χ2(df24)=36.72,p=0.05),在 n=320 的子样本上测试时具有严格的单维性。这些结果在 n=1956 的全样本中得到了复制,表现出单维性和良好的可靠性,个体分离指数为 0.81,但由于样本量大,项目特征交互作用显著。没有观察到任何个人因素的显著差异项目功能。重新评分项目或排除极端分数的参与者都没有改善模型拟合度。

结论

UK FIM+FAM 量表在创伤性脑损伤中基本符合 Rasch 模型。生成了一个转换表,但在临床实践中的实用性需要进一步探索和临床转化。

相似文献

2
6
Validation of the WHOQOL-BREF and Shorter Versions Using Rasch Analysis in Traumatic Brain Injury and Orthopedic Populations.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019 Oct;100(10):1853-1862. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2019.05.029. Epub 2019 Jun 21.
7
Rasch Analysis of the Listening Effort Questionnaire-Cochlear Implant.
Ear Hear. 2021;42(6):1699-1711. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001059.
8
A comprehensive psychometric evaluation of the UK FIM + FAM.
Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35(22):1885-95. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2013.766271. Epub 2013 Feb 5.
9
Rasch analysis of the Brain Injury Screening Tool (BIST) in mild traumatic brain injury.
BMC Neurol. 2021 Sep 29;21(1):376. doi: 10.1186/s12883-021-02410-6.
10
Scaling properties of the subjective index of physical and social outcome after stroke in a study population unselected by age.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Dec;94(12):2448-2455. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.08.243. Epub 2013 Sep 10.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验