Suppr超能文献

使用 Rasch 分析验证 WHOQOL-BREF 及简版在创伤性脑损伤和骨科人群中的适用性。

Validation of the WHOQOL-BREF and Shorter Versions Using Rasch Analysis in Traumatic Brain Injury and Orthopedic Populations.

机构信息

School of Public Health and Psychosocial Studies, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.

School of Psychology, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.

出版信息

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019 Oct;100(10):1853-1862. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2019.05.029. Epub 2019 Jun 21.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To use Rasch analysis to validate the World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF) and existing short versions in individuals with traumatic brain injury and orthopedic injuries, with comparisons to a general population group.

DESIGN

The Partial Credit Rasch model was applied to evaluate the WHOQOL-BREF as well as shortened versions using a cross-sectional study design.

SETTING

Regional hospital, and national electoral sample in New Zealand.

PARTICIPANTS

Individuals with traumatic brain injury (n=74), individuals with orthopedic injuries (n=114), general population (n=140).

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

WHOQOL-BREF.

RESULTS

The WHOQOL-BREF met expectations of the unidimensional Rasch model and demonstrated good reliability (person separation index [PSI] =0.82) when domain items were combined into physical-psychological, social, and environmental superitems. Analysis of shorter versions, the EUROHIS-QOL-8 and World Health Organization Quality of Life-5 (WHOQOL-5), indicated overall acceptable fit to the Rasch model and evidence of unidimensionality. The EUROHIS-QOL-8 showed good reliability (PSI=0.81); however, reliability of the WHOQOL-5 (PSI=0.68) was below acceptable standards for group comparisons, in addition to demonstrating poor person-item targeting.

CONCLUSIONS

The WHOQOL-BREF and the 8-item EUROHIS-QOL-8 version are both reliable and valid in the assessment of quality of life in both injury and general populations. Ordinal-interval conversion tables published for these validated scales as well as for the WHOQOL-5 can be used to improve precision of assessment. The transformation of ordinal scale scores into an interval measure of health-related quality of life also permits the calculation of a single summary score for the WHOQOL-BREF, which will be useful in a wide range of clinical and research contexts. Further validation work of the WHOQOL-5 is needed to ascertain its psychometric properties.

摘要

目的

使用 RASCH 分析来验证世界卫生组织生活质量简表(WHOQOL-BREF)以及现有的创伤性脑损伤和骨科损伤的简短版本,并与一般人群进行比较。

设计

应用部分信用 RASCH 模型,采用横断面研究设计,评估 WHOQOL-BREF 以及缩短版本。

地点

新西兰地区医院和全国选举样本。

参与者

创伤性脑损伤患者(n=74)、骨科损伤患者(n=114)、一般人群(n=140)。

干预措施

无。

主要观察指标

WHOQOL-BREF。

结果

当将域项目组合成身体-心理、社会和环境的超级项目时,WHOQOL-BREF 符合单维 RASCH 模型的预期,并表现出良好的可靠性(人员分离指数[PSI]=0.82)。对较短版本的分析,即 EUROHIS-QOL-8 和世界卫生组织生活质量-5(WHOQOL-5),表明整体上符合 RASCH 模型,具有单维性的证据。EUROHIS-QOL-8 表现出良好的可靠性(PSI=0.81);然而,WHOQOL-5 的可靠性(PSI=0.68)低于团体比较的可接受标准,此外,还表现出较差的人员项目针对性。

结论

WHOQOL-BREF 和 8 项 EUROHIS-QOL-8 版本在评估创伤和一般人群的生活质量方面都是可靠和有效的。这些经过验证的量表以及 WHOQOL-5 的序数量表转换表可用于提高评估的精度。将序数量表得分转换为健康相关生活质量的区间度量,也可以为 WHOQOL-BREF 计算一个单一的综合评分,这在广泛的临床和研究环境中都将是有用的。需要进一步验证 WHOQOL-5 的心理测量特性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验