Thomas Michael J
Population Research Centre, Faculty of Spatial Sciences University of Groningen Groningen The Netherlands.
Popul Space Place. 2019 May;25(4):e2233. doi: 10.1002/psp.2233. Epub 2019 Apr 10.
Distinctions between internal migration and residential mobility are often formed with reference to assumed differences in motivation, with migration typically linked to employment and educational motives and shorter distance mobility to housing and family. Using geocoded microdata, this article reveals how employment-led migration represents only a minority share (≈30%) of total migration events over 40 km. Family motives appear just as important, even at distances ≥100 km, with the desire to live closer to non-resident family/friends being the most frequently cited family submotive. Estimated propensities to undertake employment and educational-related migration fit very closely to predictions of human capital models of migration, being highest among young, residentially flexible and highly educated individuals. Migrants citing family-related motives are disproportionately drawn from midlife and later-life phases, with family shown to be a key motive among migrants with care-related needs (e.g., parents with children) or access to fewer resources (e.g., social renters and low educational attainment).
国内迁移和居住流动性之间的区别通常是根据动机上假定的差异来划分的,迁移通常与就业和教育动机相关,而较短距离的流动则与住房和家庭相关。利用地理编码微观数据,本文揭示了就业主导型迁移在超过40公里的总迁移事件中仅占少数份额(约30%)。家庭动机似乎同样重要,即使在距离≥100公里的情况下,希望住得离非本地家人/朋友更近是最常被提及的家庭子动机。估计的就业和教育相关迁移倾向与迁移人力资本模型的预测非常吻合,在年轻、居住灵活性高和受过高等教育的个体中最高。以家庭相关动机为由的移民 disproportionately 来自中年及以后阶段,家庭被证明是有护理相关需求的移民(如带孩子的父母)或资源较少的移民(如社会租房者和低教育程度者)的关键动机。