Ringen Amund Hovengen, Gaski Iver Anders, Rustad Hege, Skaga Nils Oddvar, Gaarder Christine, Naess Paal Aksel
Department of Anesthesia, Oslo University Hospital Ulleval, Oslo, Norway.
Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2019 Apr 25;4(1):e000282. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2018-000282. eCollection 2019.
The elderly trauma patient has increased mortality compared with younger patients. During the last 15 years, initial treatment of severely injured patients at Oslo University Hospital Ulleval (OUHU) has changed resulting in overall improved outcomes. Whether this holds true for the elderly trauma population needs exploration and was the aim of the present study.
We performed a retrospective study of 2628 trauma patients 61 years or older admitted to OUHU during the 12-year period, 2002-2013. The population was stratified based on age (61-70 years, 71-80 years, 81 years and older) and divided into time periods: 2002-2009 (P1) and 2010-2013 (P2). Multiple logistic regression models were constructed to identify clinically relevant core variables correlated with mortality and trauma team activation rate.
Crude mortality decreased from 19% in P1 to 13% in P2 (p<0.01) with an OR of 0.77 (95 %CI 0.65 to 0.91) when admitted in P2. Trauma team activation rates increased from 53% in P1 to 72% in P2 (p<0.01) with an OR of 2.16 (95% CI 1.93 to 2.41) for being met by a trauma team in P2. Mortality increased from 10% in the age group 61-70 years to 26% in the group above 80 years. Trauma team activation rates decreased from 71% in the age group 61-70 years to 50% in the age group older than 80 years. Median ISS were 17 in all three age groups and in both time periods.
Development of a multidisciplinary dedicated trauma service is associated with increased trauma team activation rate as well as survival in geriatric trauma patients. As expected, mortality increased with age, although inversely related to the likelihood of being met by a trauma team. Trauma team activation should be considered for all trauma patients older than 70 years.
Level IV.
与年轻患者相比,老年创伤患者的死亡率更高。在过去15年中,奥斯陆大学医院于勒瓦尔分院(OUHU)对重伤患者的初始治疗方法发生了变化,总体治疗效果有所改善。这种情况在老年创伤患者中是否成立需要探究,这也是本研究的目的。
我们对2002年至2013年这12年间入住OUHU的2628名61岁及以上的创伤患者进行了回顾性研究。根据年龄(61 - 70岁、71 - 80岁、81岁及以上)对人群进行分层,并分为不同时间段:2002 - 2009年(P1)和2010 - 2013年(P2)。构建了多个逻辑回归模型,以确定与死亡率和创伤团队启动率相关的临床相关核心变量。
P1期的粗死亡率从19%降至P2期的13%(p<0.01),P2期入院时的比值比为0.77(95%置信区间0.65至0.91)。创伤团队启动率从P1期的53%升至P2期的72%(p<0.01),P2期被创伤团队接诊的比值比为2.16(95%置信区间1.93至2.41)。死亡率从61 - 70岁年龄组的10%升至80岁以上年龄组的26%。创伤团队启动率从61 - 70岁年龄组的71%降至80岁以上年龄组的50%。所有三个年龄组在两个时间段的损伤严重程度评分中位数均为17。
多学科专门创伤服务的发展与创伤团队启动率的提高以及老年创伤患者的生存率相关。正如预期的那样,死亡率随年龄增加,尽管与被创伤团队接诊的可能性呈负相关。对于所有70岁以上的创伤患者,应考虑启动创伤团队。
四级。