• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

假体隆乳召回事件之后发生了什么?假体破裂对假体置换术后并发症预测价值的前瞻性队列研究:808 例植入物。

What Happened after the Poly Implant Prothèse Recall? A Prospective Cohort Study of 808 Implants into the Predictive Value of Implant Rupture on Postexchange Complications.

机构信息

From Quaba Plastic Surgery, Spire Murrayfield Hospital; the Department of Plastic, Reconstructive, Aesthetic, and Hand Surgery, University Hospital Basel; and Fitzgerald Plastic Surgery, Beacon Clinic.

出版信息

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 Jul;144(1):35e-42e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005706.

DOI:10.1097/PRS.0000000000005706
PMID:31246806
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Problems with a variety of breast implants have emerged with consequences for patients' health and safety. The authors' goal was to follow up on their Poly Implant Prothèse patients after their implant exchange.

METHODS

This single-center, single-surgeon, prospective cohort study lasted from 2012 until 2017. Implant size, implantation interval, surgical details, and complications were registered. The Clavien-Dindo classification was used to grade postoperative complications. Logistic regression was used to investigate whether rupture, interval between implantation and explantation, and new implant size were predictors of postexchange complications.

RESULTS

The authors explanted 808 implants in 404 patients. The rupture rate was 30.9 percent per patient and 20.2 percent per implant. The capsular contracture rate at the time of exchange was low, with 1.86 percent of implants and 2.7 percent of patients; 97.8 percent of patients elected implant exchange and only 2.2 percent just wanted their implants removed. The mean follow-up after implant exchange was 5.2 years, with the last mandatory outpatient appointment usually being scheduled 6 to 12 months after implant exchange. The authors found that 74 patients (18.3 percent) and 124 implants (15.3 percent) had postexchange complications, the majority of them minor (83 percent Clavien-Dindo grade I). Patients with a ruptured implant at the time of exchange were significantly more likely to develop postexchange complications than were patients without rupture.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study providing such a complete long-term postexchange follow-up of a single surgeon's Poly Implant Prothèse implant cohort. Implant rupture at the time of exchange had a high predictive value for postexchange complications in the authors' series of 808 implants and 404 Poly Implant Prothèse recall patients.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

摘要

背景

各种乳房植入物出现了问题,对患者的健康和安全造成了影响。作者的目的是对他们的 Poly Implant Prothèse 患者进行植入物更换后的随访。

方法

这是一项单中心、单外科医生、前瞻性队列研究,持续时间为 2012 年至 2017 年。记录了植入物大小、植入间隔、手术细节和并发症。使用 Clavien-Dindo 分类对术后并发症进行分级。使用逻辑回归分析破裂、植入和取出间隔以及新植入物大小是否是交换后并发症的预测因素。

结果

作者共取出 404 名患者的 808 个植入物。每个患者的破裂率为 30.9%,每个植入物的破裂率为 20.2%。在更换时包膜挛缩的发生率较低,植入物为 1.86%,患者为 2.7%;97.8%的患者选择更换植入物,只有 2.2%的患者只想取出植入物。植入物更换后的平均随访时间为 5.2 年,最后一次强制性门诊预约通常在植入物更换后 6 至 12 个月进行。作者发现 74 名患者(18.3%)和 124 个植入物(15.3%)出现了更换后的并发症,其中大多数为轻微并发症(Clavien-Dindo 分级 I 级,83%)。在更换时发生破裂的患者发生更换后并发症的可能性明显高于未破裂的患者。

结论

这是第一项对单个外科医生的 Poly Implant Prothèse 植入物队列进行完整的长期更换后随访的研究。在作者的 808 个植入物和 404 个 Poly Implant Prothèse 召回患者系列中,更换时的植入物破裂对更换后的并发症具有很高的预测价值。

临床问题/证据水平:治疗,IV。

相似文献

1
What Happened after the Poly Implant Prothèse Recall? A Prospective Cohort Study of 808 Implants into the Predictive Value of Implant Rupture on Postexchange Complications.假体隆乳召回事件之后发生了什么?假体破裂对假体置换术后并发症预测价值的前瞻性队列研究:808 例植入物。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 Jul;144(1):35e-42e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005706.
2
Poly Implant Prothèse and Rofil Substandard Breast Implant Explantations from a Large German Single Centre from 2011 to 2014: A Comparative Study.2011年至2014年德国一家大型单中心的宝俪假体和Rofil不合格隆胸假体取出术:一项对比研究。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2016 Aug;40(4):507-13. doi: 10.1007/s00266-016-0666-1. Epub 2016 Jun 10.
3
Silicone lymphadenopathy after breast augmentation: case reports, review of the literature, and current thoughts.硅酮性淋巴结病继发于隆乳术后:病例报告、文献复习及目前的观点。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2013 Apr;37(2):278-89. doi: 10.1007/s00266-012-0025-9. Epub 2013 Jan 26.
4
The clinical and diagnostic consequences of Poly Implant Prothèse silicone breast implants, recalled from the European market in 2010.2010 年从欧洲市场召回的 Poly Implant Prothèse 硅树脂乳房植入物的临床和诊断后果。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Mar;131(3):394e-402e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31827c70aa.
5
Prevalence of rupture in poly implant Prothèse silicone breast implants, recalled from the European market in 2010.2010 年从欧洲市场召回的 Poly Implant Prothèse 硅凝胶乳房植入体的破裂发生率。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012 Jun;129(6):1372-1378. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31824f0108.
6
Poly implant prothèse asymmetrical anatomical breast implants: a product recall study.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015 Jan;135(1):25-33. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001007.
7
Comparison of Allergan, Mentor, and Sientra Contoured Cohesive Gel Breast Implants: A Single Surgeon's 10-Year Experience.艾尔建、曼托和仙特拉轮廓状粘性凝胶乳房植入物的比较:一位外科医生的10年经验
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015 Nov;136(5):957-966. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001675.
8
The PIP mammary prosthesis: a product recall study.PIP 乳房假体:产品召回研究。
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2012 Jun;65(6):697-704. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2012.02.019. Epub 2012 Mar 9.
9
Magnetic resonance imaging screening results compared with explantation results in poly implant prothèse silicone breast implants, recalled from the European market in 2010.2010 年从欧洲市场召回的 Poly Implant Prothèse 硅胶乳房植入物的磁共振成像筛查结果与取出结果比较。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014 Feb;133(2):114e-120e. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000436853.32527.c3.
10
Eight-Year Safety Data for Round and Anatomical Silicone Gel Breast Implants.圆形和解剖型硅凝胶乳房植入物的八年安全性数据。
Aesthet Surg J. 2018 Feb 17;38(2):151-161. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjx117.

引用本文的文献

1
The ethics of explantation.移除植入物的伦理学问题。
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Sep 8;22(1):121. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00690-8.
2
The Value of Morphometric Measurements in Risk Assessment for Donor-Site Complications after Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction.显微外科乳房重建术后供区并发症风险评估中形态测量的价值
J Clin Med. 2020 Aug 14;9(8):2645. doi: 10.3390/jcm9082645.