• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

验证纽约脓毒症严重程度评分与脓毒症严重程度评分在预测脓毒症患者住院死亡率方面的性能。

Validation the performance of New York Sepsis Severity Score compared with Sepsis Severity Score in predicting hospital mortality among sepsis patients.

机构信息

Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla 90110, Thailand.

Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla 90110, Thailand.

出版信息

J Crit Care. 2019 Oct;53:155-161. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2019.06.017. Epub 2019 Jun 19.

DOI:10.1016/j.jcrc.2019.06.017
PMID:31247514
Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to compare the performance of the New York Sepsis Severity Score (NYSSS) with the Sepsis Severity Score (SSS) and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation and Simplified Acute Physiology Scores for predicting mortality in sepsis patients.

METHOD

A retrospective analysis was conducted in the intensive care unit. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality.

RESULTS

Overall 1680 sepsis patients were enrolled. The hospital mortality rate was 44.4%. The NYSSS underestimated actual mortality with standard mortality ratio (SMR) of 1.28 (95%CI 1.19-1.38). However, the SSS slightly overestimated the actual mortality with an SMR of 0.94 (0.88-1.01). The NYSSS had moderate discrimination with an AUC of 0.772 (0.750-0.794), in contrast to the SSS which had good discrimination with an AUC of 0.889 (0.873-0.904). The AUC of the SSS was statistically higher than that of the NYSSS. The AUCs of both the NYSSS and SSS were significantly lower than other standard severity scores. The calibrations for all severity scores were poor. The SSS had better overall performance than the NYSSS (Brier score 0.149 and 0.201, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The SSS had better discrimination and overall performance than the NYSSS. However, both sepsis severity scores were poorly calibrated.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较纽约败血症严重程度评分(NYSSS)与败血症严重程度评分(SSS)和急性生理学与慢性健康评估及简化急性生理学评分对败血症患者死亡率的预测能力。

方法

在重症监护病房进行回顾性分析。主要结局为院内死亡率。

结果

共纳入 1680 例败血症患者。住院死亡率为 44.4%。NYSSS 的标准死亡率比(SMR)为 1.28(95%CI 1.19-1.38),低估了实际死亡率。然而,SSS 的 SMR 为 0.94(0.88-1.01),略微高估了实际死亡率。NYSSS 的区分度中等,AUC 为 0.772(0.750-0.794),而 SSS 的区分度较好,AUC 为 0.889(0.873-0.904)。SSS 的 AUC 高于 NYSSS。NYSSS 和 SSS 的 AUC 均明显低于其他标准严重程度评分。所有严重程度评分的校准均较差。SSS 的整体性能优于 NYSSS(Brier 评分分别为 0.149 和 0.201)。

结论

SSS 比 NYSSS 具有更好的区分度和整体性能。然而,这两种败血症严重程度评分的校准都较差。

相似文献

1
Validation the performance of New York Sepsis Severity Score compared with Sepsis Severity Score in predicting hospital mortality among sepsis patients.验证纽约脓毒症严重程度评分与脓毒症严重程度评分在预测脓毒症患者住院死亡率方面的性能。
J Crit Care. 2019 Oct;53:155-161. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2019.06.017. Epub 2019 Jun 19.
2
Validation of the Sepsis Severity Score Compared with Updated Severity Scores in Predicting Hospital Mortality in Sepsis Patients.脓毒症严重程度评分与更新后的严重程度评分在预测脓毒症患者医院死亡率方面的验证
Shock. 2017 Jun;47(6):720-725. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000000818.
3
Comparative Predictive Accuracies of the Simplified Mortality Score for the Intensive Care Unit, Sepsis Severity Score, and Standard Severity Scores for 90-day Mortality in Sepsis Patients.重症监护病房简化死亡率评分、脓毒症严重程度评分及标准严重程度评分对脓毒症患者90天死亡率的比较预测准确性
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2024 Apr;28(4):343-348. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24673.
4
Validation of predisposition, infection, response and organ dysfunction score compared with standard severity scores in predicting hospital outcome in septic shock patients.比较易感性、感染、反应和器官功能障碍评分与标准严重程度评分在预测脓毒性休克患者住院结局中的作用。
Minerva Anestesiol. 2013 Mar;79(3):257-63. Epub 2012 Dec 20.
5
Performance of Simplified Acute Physiology Score 3 In Predicting Hospital Mortality In Emergency Intensive Care Unit.简化急性生理学评分3在预测急诊重症监护病房患者医院死亡率中的表现
Chin Med J (Engl). 2017 Jul 5;130(13):1544-1551. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.208250.
6
External validation of the sepsis severity score.脓毒症严重程度评分的外部验证。
Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 2020 Jan-Dec;34:2058738420936386. doi: 10.1177/2058738420936386.
7
Performance of three prognostic models in patients with cancer in need of intensive care in a medical center in China.中国某医疗中心中,三种预后模型在需要重症监护的癌症患者中的表现。
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 25;10(6):e0131329. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131329. eCollection 2015.
8
The predictive performance of SAPS 2 and SAPS 3 in an intermediate care unit for internal medicine at a German university transplant center; A retrospective analysis.SAPS 2 和 SAPS 3 在德国大学移植中心内科中级护理单元中的预测性能;回顾性分析。
PLoS One. 2019 Sep 25;14(9):e0222164. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222164. eCollection 2019.
9
The performance of customised APACHE II and SAPS II in predicting mortality of mixed critically ill patients in a Thai medical intensive care unit.定制的急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统II(APACHE II)和简化急性生理学评分系统II(SAPS II)在预测泰国某医疗重症监护病房中混合危重症患者死亡率方面的表现。
Anaesth Intensive Care. 2009 Sep;37(5):784-90. doi: 10.1177/0310057X0903700515.
10
Predictive value of SAPS II and APACHE II scoring systems for patient outcome in a medical intensive care unit.SAPS II和APACHE II评分系统对内科重症监护病房患者预后的预测价值。
Acta Med Acad. 2016 Nov;45(2):97-103. doi: 10.5644/ama2006-124.165.

引用本文的文献

1
Association between 24-hour urine volume and 28-day intensive care unit mortality in sepsis patients: a multi-center retrospective cohort study.脓毒症患者24小时尿量与28天重症监护病房死亡率之间的关联:一项多中心回顾性队列研究
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Nov 26;11:1486232. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1486232. eCollection 2024.
2
Comparative Predictive Accuracies of the Simplified Mortality Score for the Intensive Care Unit, Sepsis Severity Score, and Standard Severity Scores for 90-day Mortality in Sepsis Patients.重症监护病房简化死亡率评分、脓毒症严重程度评分及标准严重程度评分对脓毒症患者90天死亡率的比较预测准确性
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2024 Apr;28(4):343-348. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24673.
3
Association Between Red Cell Distribution Width and Hospital Mortality in Patients with Sepsis.
红细胞分布宽度与脓毒症患者住院死亡率的相关性研究。
J Int Med Res. 2021 Apr;49(4):3000605211004221. doi: 10.1177/03000605211004221.
4
External validation of the sepsis severity score.脓毒症严重程度评分的外部验证。
Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 2020 Jan-Dec;34:2058738420936386. doi: 10.1177/2058738420936386.