IEEE Trans Haptics. 2019 Oct-Dec;12(4):461-469. doi: 10.1109/TOH.2019.2922284. Epub 2019 Jun 24.
Haptics technologies have the potential to considerably improve the acquisition of handwriting skills by providing physical assistance to improve movement accuracy and precision. To date, very few studies have thoroughly examined the effectiveness of various haptic guidance methods to leverage the acquisition of handwriting skills. In this paper, we examine the role of several methods for haptic guidance, namely full haptic guidance, partial haptic guidance, disturbance haptic guidance, and no-haptic guidance toward improving the learning outcomes of handwriting skills acquisition for typical children. A group of 42 children from Cranleigh School Abu Dhabi across two educational stages, namely Foundation Stage 2 (FS2, 4-5 years old) and Year 2 (6-7 years old), participated in this study. Results showed that disturbance haptic guidance was the most effective for high complexity handwriting tasks (such as writing the letters "o" and "g"), partial haptic guidance was the most effective for medium complexity handwriting tasks (such as "t," "r," "s," "e," "n," "a," and "b"), and full haptic guidance was the most effective for low complexity letters (such as "i"). Another interesting finding was that FS2 participants had statistically significant improvement in handwriting speed compared to the Year 2 group, demonstrated by a significantly shorter test completion time. Furthermore, female children performed statistically better than their male counterparts in partial guidance. These results can be utilized to build more effective haptic-based handwriting tools for typical children.
触觉技术有可能通过提供物理辅助来极大地提高手写技能的习得,从而提高运动的准确性和精度。迄今为止,很少有研究全面检查各种触觉引导方法的有效性,以利用手写技能的习得。在本文中,我们研究了几种触觉引导方法的作用,即全触觉引导、部分触觉引导、干扰触觉引导和无触觉引导,以提高典型儿童的手写技能习得的学习效果。来自阿布扎比克兰利学校的 42 名儿童参加了这项研究,他们分为两个教育阶段,即基础阶段 2(FS2,4-5 岁)和 2 年级(6-7 岁)。结果表明,干扰触觉引导对于高复杂度的手写任务(如写字母“o”和“g”)最有效,部分触觉引导对于中复杂度的手写任务(如“t”、“r”、“s”、“e”、“n”、“a”和“b”)最有效,而全触觉引导对于低复杂度的字母(如“i”)最有效。另一个有趣的发现是,FS2 参与者的手写速度与 2 年级组相比有统计学上的显著提高,表现为测试完成时间明显缩短。此外,在部分指导中,女性儿童的表现明显优于男性儿童。这些结果可用于为典型儿童构建更有效的基于触觉的手写工具。