Suppr超能文献

经口胆管镜引导下钳取活检及内镜刮除术用于诊断不明原因的肝外胆管狭窄

Peroral Cholangioscopy-Guided Forceps Biopsy and Endoscopic Scraper for the Diagnosis of Indeterminate Extrahepatic Biliary Stricture.

作者信息

Kato Masayuki, Onoyama Takumi, Takeda Yohei, Kawata Soichiro, Kurumi Hiroki, Koda Hiroki, Yamashita Taro, Hamamoto Wataru, Sakamoto Yuri, Matsumoto Kazuya, Isomoto Hajime

机构信息

Division of Medicine and Clinical Science, Department of Multidisciplinary Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Nishi-cho 36-1, Yonago 683-8504, Japan.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2019 Jun 19;8(6):873. doi: 10.3390/jcm8060873.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Peroral cholangioscopy (POCS) has become a widely-used technique in diagnosing indeterminate biliary strictures, enabling optical viewing of the biliary system and targeted biopsies under direct vision. The diagnostic utility of the new endoscopic scraper, Trefle, for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ECC) has also been reported. However, the diagnostic utility of POCS-guided and Trefle-assisted tissue acquisition for ECC has never been compared empirically. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of Trefle-assisted tissue acquisition for diagnosing ECC compared with POCS-guided tissue sampling.

METHODS

Patients who underwent Trefle-assisted tissue acquisition or POCS-guided forceps biopsy to differentiate ECC from benign biliary disease between April 2014 and March 2018 were enrolled retrospectively. We evaluated the diagnostic performance of Trefle-assisted tissue acquisition and POCS-guided forceps biopsy based on pathological evaluation. We also compared adverse events associated with Trefle-assisted tissue acquisition with those of POCS-guided forceps biopsy.

RESULTS

We enrolled 34 patients with biliary disease and performed Trefle-assisted tissue acquisition and POCS-guided forceps biopsy in 14 and 20 patients, respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of Trefle-assisted tissue acquisition were 87.5%, 83.3%, and 85.7%, respectively, and for POCS-guided forceps biopsy, these were 90.0% each. Statistical values of Trefle-assisted tissue acquisition and POCS-guided tissue acquisition were not significantly different. There were no significant differences in the occurrence of adverse events between the Trefle-assisted tissue acquisition and the POCS-guided forceps biopsy (35.7% vs. 25.0%, 0.770). Compared with patients who underwent POCS procedure, endoscopic sphincterotomy was performed for fewer patients who underwent Trefle-assisted tissue acquisition ( 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The diagnostic ability of Trefle-assisted tissue acquisition for ECC is similar to that of POCS-guided tissue acquisition. Trefle-assisted tissue acquisition might also help to preserve the sphincter of Oddi and its digestive function.

摘要

背景

经口胆管镜检查(POCS)已成为诊断不明原因胆管狭窄的一种广泛应用的技术,能够在直视下对胆管系统进行光学观察并进行靶向活检。新型内镜刮匙Trefle对肝外胆管癌(ECC)的诊断效用也已有报道。然而,POCS引导下联合Trefle辅助组织获取对ECC的诊断效用从未经过实证比较。我们评估了Trefle辅助组织获取与POCS引导下组织采样相比对ECC的诊断效能和安全性。

方法

回顾性纳入2014年4月至2018年3月期间接受Trefle辅助组织获取或POCS引导下钳取活检以鉴别ECC与良性胆道疾病的患者。我们基于病理评估来评估Trefle辅助组织获取和POCS引导下钳取活检的诊断性能。我们还比较了Trefle辅助组织获取与POCS引导下钳取活检相关的不良事件。

结果

我们纳入了34例胆道疾病患者,分别对14例和20例患者进行了Trefle辅助组织获取和POCS引导下钳取活检。Trefle辅助组织获取的敏感性、特异性和准确性分别为87.5%、83.3%和85.7%,POCS引导下钳取活检的上述指标均为90.0%。Trefle辅助组织获取和POCS引导下组织获取的统计学值无显著差异。Trefle辅助组织获取与POCS引导下钳取活检的不良事件发生率无显著差异(35.7%对25.0%,P = 0.770)。与接受POCS操作的患者相比,接受Trefle辅助组织获取的患者进行内镜括约肌切开术的更少(P = 0.001)。

结论

Trefle辅助组织获取对ECC的诊断能力与POCS引导下组织获取相似。Trefle辅助组织获取可能还有助于保留Oddi括约肌及其消化功能。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e67b/6616582/8fa5c91ff199/jcm-08-00873-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验