• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[开放楔形高位胫骨截骨术与单髁膝关节置换术治疗膝关节内侧间室骨关节炎的Meta分析]

[Open-wedge high tibial osteotomy and unicomartmental knee arthroplasty in treating medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee: a Meta analysis].

作者信息

Huang Meng-Quan, Li Yu-Biao, Liao Chun-Lai, Guo Nai-Ming, Peng Jun, Luo Xiao-Wei, Lai Qiu-Lian

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, Southern Theater Air Force Hospital of PLA, Guangzhou 510000, Guangdong, China;

Department of Orthopaedics, Southern Theater Air Force Hospital of PLA, Guangzhou 510000, Guangdong, China.

出版信息

Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2019 May 25;32(5):428-433. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2019.05.008.

DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2019.05.008
PMID:31248237
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To systematic evaluate the outcome of open-wedge high tibial osteotomy(OWHTO) and unicomartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) in treating medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee.

METHODS

According to the retrieval strategy made by the Cochrane collaboration, a computer-base research of Medline, Pubmed, EMbase, Cochrane Library, CBM, CNKI, and Wanfang databases was performed and search deadline was March 2018. Related Chinese and English orthopedic journals and conference papers were manually searched. Controlled studies of OWHTO and UKA in the treatment of medial knee osteoarthritis were included. The quality of included researches was evaluated, and the data of postoperative knee function, complications, total knee arthroplasty(TKA) revision rates, and postoperative pain were extracted. Meta analysis was performed using the RevMan 5.0 software.

RESULTS

A total of 8 articles that met the criteria were included containing a total of 675 patients. Meta-analysis showed that there was no significant difference in postoperative HSS score, knee score, functional score, and Lysholm score between the OWHTO and UKA groups(=0.32, =0.87, =0.22, =0.53). The range of joint motion in the OWHTO group was better than that in the UKA group, and the difference was statistically significant(=0.009). There was no significant difference in postoperative complications and the rates of revision to TKA between the two groups(=0.81, =0.23). There was no difference in postoperative knee pain between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In the treatment of medial compartmental osteoarthritis of the knee that meets the surgical indications, OWHTO had better postoperative joint mobility. The results were similar in postoperative knee score, postoperative complications, and postoperative TKA revision rates between OWHTO and UKA groups.

摘要

目的

系统评价开放性楔形高位胫骨截骨术(OWHTO)与单髁膝关节置换术(UKA)治疗膝关节内侧间室骨关节炎的疗效。

方法

根据Cochrane协作网制定的检索策略,对Medline、Pubmed、EMbase、Cochrane图书馆、中国生物医学文献数据库(CBM)、中国知网(CNKI)和万方数据库进行计算机检索,检索截止日期为2018年3月。同时手动检索相关中英文骨科期刊及会议论文。纳入OWHTO与UKA治疗膝关节内侧骨关节炎的对照研究。对纳入研究的质量进行评价,并提取术后膝关节功能、并发症、全膝关节置换术(TKA)翻修率及术后疼痛的数据。使用RevMan 5.0软件进行Meta分析。

结果

共纳入8篇符合标准的文章,共计675例患者。Meta分析显示,OWHTO组与UKA组术后HSS评分、膝关节评分、功能评分及Lysholm评分差异无统计学意义(I² = 0.32,P = 0.87,I² = 0.22,P = 0.53)。OWHTO组关节活动度优于UKA组,差异有统计学意义(I² = 0.009)。两组术后并发症及TKA翻修率差异无统计学意义(I² = 0.81,P = 0.23)。两组术后膝关节疼痛差异无统计学意义。

结论

在治疗符合手术指征的膝关节内侧间室骨关节炎时,OWHTO术后关节活动度更佳。OWHTO组与UKA组术后膝关节评分、术后并发症及术后TKA翻修率结果相似。

相似文献

1
[Open-wedge high tibial osteotomy and unicomartmental knee arthroplasty in treating medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee: a Meta analysis].[开放楔形高位胫骨截骨术与单髁膝关节置换术治疗膝关节内侧间室骨关节炎的Meta分析]
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2019 May 25;32(5):428-433. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2019.05.008.
2
Mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in old-aged patients demonstrates superior short-term clinical outcomes to open-wedge high tibial osteotomy in middle-aged patients with advanced isolated medial osteoarthritis.老年患者的活动平台单髁膝关节置换术在短期临床结果方面优于中年患者的开放式楔形胫骨高位截骨术,用于治疗进展期单纯内侧骨关节炎。
Int Orthop. 2018 Oct;42(10):2357-2363. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-3880-4. Epub 2018 Mar 22.
3
[Meta analysis of unilateral condylar replacement and high tibial osteotomy in the treatment of medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee].[单侧髁置换术与胫骨高位截骨术治疗膝关节内侧间室骨关节炎的Meta分析]
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2018 Dec 25;31(12):1156-1163. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2018.12.017.
4
Therapeutic Effects Comparison and Revision Case Analysis of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty and Open Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy in Treating Medial Knee Osteoarthritis in Patients Under 60 years: A 2-6-year Follow-up Study.60 岁以下内侧膝关节骨关节炎患者行单髁膝关节置换术与开放楔形胫骨高位截骨术的疗效对比及翻修病例分析:2-6 年随访研究。
Orthop Surg. 2020 Dec;12(6):1635-1643. doi: 10.1111/os.12761. Epub 2020 Sep 6.
5
Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty versus high tibial osteotomy for medial knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.单髁膝关节置换术与胫骨高位截骨术治疗内侧膝关节骨关节炎的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2023 Jan-Apr;31(1):10225536231162829. doi: 10.1177/10225536231162829.
6
Is proximal tibial tubercle osteotomy superior to distal tibial tubercle osteotomy for medial compartmental osteoarthritis? A meta-analysis.对于内侧间室骨关节炎,胫骨近端结节截骨术是否优于胫骨远端结节截骨术?一项荟萃分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Mar 27;18(1):245. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-03725-5.
7
Patient-reported outcome measures after mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty were better than medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy in early elderly patients with severe osteoarthritis.在早期老年严重骨关节炎患者中,活动平台单髁膝关节置换术后患者报告的结局测量指标优于内侧开放楔形胫骨高位截骨术。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Oct;143(10):6339-6344. doi: 10.1007/s00402-023-04888-w. Epub 2023 Apr 27.
8
Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty vs High Tibial Osteotomy for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.单髁膝关节置换术与胫骨高位截骨术治疗膝关节骨关节炎的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Mar;33(3):952-959. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.10.025. Epub 2017 Dec 2.
9
Clinical Outcomes of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty after High Tibial Osteotomy and Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.翻修全膝关节置换术治疗高位胫骨截骨术和单髁膝关节置换术后的临床疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Orthop Surg. 2022 Aug;14(8):1549-1557. doi: 10.1111/os.13311. Epub 2022 May 25.
10
Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty is superior to high tibial osteotomy for the treatment of medial unicompartmental osteoarthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.单髁膝关节置换术优于胫骨高位截骨术治疗内侧单间室骨关节炎:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Jul 29;101(30):e29576. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000029576.

引用本文的文献

1
Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty is associated with lower pain levels but inferior range of motion, compared with high tibial osteotomy: a systematic overview of meta-analyses.单髁膝关节置换术与胫骨高位截骨术相比,疼痛程度较低,但活动范围较小:荟萃分析的系统评价。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2022 Sep 24;17(1):425. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-03319-7.