Department of Medicine, Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Department of Medicine, Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Jul 2;73(25):3271-3280. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.02.079.
The COMPASS (Cardiovascular Outcomes for People Using Anticoagulation Strategies) trial showed that the combination of low-dose rivaroxaban and aspirin reduced major vascular events in patients with stable vascular disease.
The purpose of this study was to identify subsets of patients at higher risk of recurrent vascular events, which may help focus the use of rivaroxaban and aspirin therapy.
COMPASS patients with vascular disease were risk stratified using 2 methods: the REACH (REduction of Atherothrombosis for Continued Health) atherothrombosis risk score and CART (Classification and Regression Tree) analysis. The absolute risk differences for rivaroxaban with aspirin were compared to aspirin alone over 30 months for the composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, acute limb ischemia, or vascular amputation; for severe bleeding; and for the net clinical benefit.
High-risk patients using the REACH score were those with 2 or more vascular beds affected, history of heart failure (HF), or renal insufficiency, and by CART analysis were those with ≥2 vascular beds affected, history of HF, or diabetes. Rivaroxaban and aspirin combination reduced the serious vascular event incidence by 25% (4.48% vs. 5.95%, hazard ratio: 0.75; 95% confidence interval: 0.66 to 0.85), equivalent to 23 events prevented per 1,000 patients treated for 30 months, at the cost of a nonsignificant 34% increase in severe bleeding (1.34; 95% confidence interval: 0.95 to 1.88), or 2 events caused per 1,000 patients treated. Among patients with ≥1 high-risk feature identified from the CART analysis, rivaroxaban and aspirin prevented 33 serious vascular events, whereas in lower-risk patients, rivaroxaban and aspirin treatment led to the avoidance of 10 events per 1,000 patients treated for 30 months.
In patients with vascular disease, further risk stratification can identify higher-risk patients (≥2 vascular beds affected, HF, renal insufficiency, or diabetes). The net clinical benefit remains favorable for most patients treated with rivaroxaban and aspirin compared with aspirin.
COMPASS(使用抗凝策略的患者心血管结果)试验表明,低剂量利伐沙班和阿司匹林联合治疗可降低稳定血管疾病患者的主要血管事件。
本研究旨在确定复发性血管事件风险较高的患者亚组,这可能有助于集中使用利伐沙班和阿司匹林治疗。
使用两种方法对 COMPASS 血管疾病患者进行风险分层:REACH(继续健康的动脉粥样硬化血栓形成减少)动脉粥样硬化血栓形成风险评分和 CART(分类和回归树)分析。在 30 个月内,与单独使用阿司匹林相比,利伐沙班联合阿司匹林治疗的心血管死亡、心肌梗死、卒中等复合终点的绝对风险差异,严重出血的绝对风险差异,以及净临床获益。
使用 REACH 评分的高危患者为 2 个或更多血管床受累、心力衰竭(HF)或肾功能不全病史,而 CART 分析的高危患者为≥2 个血管床受累、HF 或糖尿病病史。利伐沙班联合阿司匹林治疗可使严重血管事件发生率降低 25%(4.48%比 5.95%,风险比:0.75;95%置信区间:0.66 至 0.85),相当于每 1000 例患者治疗 30 个月可预防 23 例事件,而严重出血的风险增加 34%无统计学意义(1.34;95%置信区间:0.95 至 1.88),即每 1000 例患者治疗会增加 2 例事件。在 CART 分析中确定的≥1 个高危特征的患者中,利伐沙班联合阿司匹林可预防 33 例严重血管事件,而在低危患者中,利伐沙班联合阿司匹林治疗可避免每 1000 例患者治疗 30 个月发生 10 例事件。
在血管疾病患者中,进一步的风险分层可以确定更高风险的患者(≥2 个血管床受累、HF、肾功能不全或糖尿病)。与单独使用阿司匹林相比,大多数接受利伐沙班和阿司匹林治疗的患者的净临床获益仍然有利。