• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者在血管内深静脉介入治疗中的辐射暴露。

Patient radiation exposure for endovascular deep venous interventions.

机构信息

Academic Department of Vascular Surgery, School of Cardiovascular Medicine and Sciences, King's College London, United Kingdom; BHF Centre of Excellence, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.

Department of Interventional Radiology, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2020 Mar;8(2):259-267. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2019.03.018. Epub 2019 Jun 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.jvsv.2019.03.018
PMID:31248834
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The study aimed to assess the cumulative radiation exposure from preoperative, periprocedural, and follow-up imaging to patients who underwent common endovascular deep venous interventions for acute and chronic central venous outflow obstructive diseases; namely, deep vein thrombosis (DVT) thrombolysis, unilateral chronic iliofemoral venous stenting, and inferior vena cava (IVC) reconstruction in a single center.

METHODS

Patients who had DVT thrombolysis of upper extremity (UE) DVT and lower extremity (LE) DVT, unilateral chronic iliofemoral venous stenting, and endovascular IVC reconstruction between May 1, 2012, and July 31, 2017, in a single unit were retrospectively reviewed. Demographic data, anatomic DVT, imaging, technical details of the index procedure, follow-up, and radiation exposure measured in dose-length product, dose-area product (DAP), and fluoroscopy time (FT) from related computed tomography scans and interventions were analyzed. Mann-Whitney U tests were performed to assess for significance of differences between subgroups. A P value of less than .05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

In total, 20 UE DVT thrombolysis, 91 LE DVT thrombolysis, 56 unilateral chronic iliofemoral venous stenting, and 39 endovascular IVC reconstruction patients were included in the study, with the following median ages: 39 years (range, 20-67 years), 44 years (range, 15-78 years), 45 years (range, 20-80 years), and 35 years (range, 18 -73 years), respectively. The median cumulative DAP for the index DVT thrombolysis was 9.2 Gycm (range, 0.2-176.0 Gycm) for LE DVT and 2.0 Gycm (range, 0.1-11.7 Gycm) for UE DVT (P < .0001). The median cumulative FT for the index thrombolysis was 981 seconds (range, 20-4890 seconds) and 837 seconds (range, 19-2895 seconds) for LE DVT and UE DVT, respectively (P = .18). For unilateral chronic iliofemoral venous stenting, the median cumulative DAP and FT were 32.4 Gycm (range, 0.1-289.6 Gycm) and 660 seconds (range, 246-4200 seconds), respectively. Meanwhile, the median cumulative DAP and FT for the endovascular IVC reconstruction were 60.8 Gycm (range, 2.5-269.1 Gycm) and 2846 seconds (range, 836-11682 seconds), respectively. The median DAP for secondary procedures during follow-up was 6.6 Gycm (range, 0.8 186.5 Gycm), 1.9 Gycm (range, 0.2-111.7 Gycm), and 24.3 Gycm (range, 0.2-157.5 Gycm) for LE DVT thrombolysis, unilateral chronic iliofemoral venous stenting, and endovascular IVC reconstruction, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient radiation exposure for endovascular deep venous interventions for central venous outflow obstruction measured in DAP and FT seemed to be less than and at most similar to anatomically comparable arterial interventions in the literature. However, these patients were usually much younger than those with arterial diseases and may need secondary interventions involving further radiation exposure in their lifetime.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估在单个中心接受常见的血管内深静脉介入治疗急性和慢性中心静脉流出阻塞性疾病(即上肢深静脉血栓形成[DVT]溶栓、单侧慢性髂股静脉支架置入和下腔静脉[IVC]重建)的患者的术前、围手术期和随访影像学检查的累积辐射暴露。

方法

回顾性分析 2012 年 5 月 1 日至 2017 年 7 月 31 日期间在单个单位接受上肢 DVT 和下肢 DVT 溶栓、单侧慢性髂股静脉支架置入和血管内 IVC 重建的患者。分析人口统计学数据、解剖 DVT、影像学检查、指数手术的技术细节、随访和相关 CT 扫描和介入的剂量长度产品、剂量面积乘积(DAP)和透视时间(FT)的辐射暴露。采用 Mann-Whitney U 检验评估亚组之间的差异是否有统计学意义。P 值小于.05 被认为有统计学意义。

结果

共有 20 例上肢 DVT 溶栓、91 例下肢 DVT 溶栓、56 例单侧慢性髂股静脉支架置入和 39 例血管内 IVC 重建患者纳入研究,其年龄中位数分别为 39 岁(范围,20-67 岁)、44 岁(范围,15-78 岁)、45 岁(范围,20-80 岁)和 35 岁(范围,18-73 岁)。下肢 DVT 溶栓的指数 DVT 溶栓的中位 DAP 为 9.2 Gycm(范围,0.2-176.0 Gycm),上肢 DVT 为 2.0 Gycm(范围,0.1-11.7 Gycm)(P<.0001)。下肢 DVT 和上肢 DVT 的指数溶栓的中位 FT 分别为 981 秒(范围,20-4890 秒)和 837 秒(范围,19-2895 秒)(P=.18)。单侧慢性髂股静脉支架置入的中位 DAP 和 FT 分别为 32.4 Gycm(范围,0.1-289.6 Gycm)和 660 秒(范围,246-4200 秒)。同时,血管内 IVC 重建的中位 DAP 和 FT 分别为 60.8 Gycm(范围,2.5-269.1 Gycm)和 2846 秒(范围,836-11682 秒)。随访期间的二级手术的中位 DAP 分别为下肢 DVT 溶栓、单侧慢性髂股静脉支架置入和血管内 IVC 重建的 6.6 Gycm(范围,0.8-186.5 Gycm)、1.9 Gycm(范围,0.2-111.7 Gycm)和 24.3 Gycm(范围,0.2-157.5 Gycm)。

结论

以 DAP 和 FT 衡量的血管内深静脉介入治疗中心静脉流出阻塞的患者的辐射暴露似乎低于文献中解剖学可比的动脉介入,并且最多与之相似。然而,这些患者通常比患有动脉疾病的患者年轻得多,他们可能需要在其一生中进行涉及进一步辐射暴露的二次干预。

相似文献

1
Patient radiation exposure for endovascular deep venous interventions.患者在血管内深静脉介入治疗中的辐射暴露。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2020 Mar;8(2):259-267. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2019.03.018. Epub 2019 Jun 24.
2
Patient radiation exposure from embolo-sclerotherapy of peripheral vascular malformations.外周血管畸形栓塞硬化疗法的患者辐射暴露。
J Vasc Surg. 2021 May;73(5):1794-1799. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.08.152. Epub 2020 Oct 16.
3
Guidance of Venous Stent Implantation after Catheter-directed Thrombosis in Patients with Acute Left Lower Extremity Deep Venous Thrombosis based on Pressure Gradient Differences between the Iliac Vein and Inferior Vena Cava: A Single-center Retrospective Study.基于髂静脉与下腔静脉压力梯度差异的急性左下肢深静脉血栓形成患者导管直接溶栓后静脉支架植入的指导:一项单中心回顾性研究
Ann Vasc Surg. 2019 Aug;59:217-224. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2018.12.088. Epub 2019 Feb 22.
4
Outcomes and predictors of failure of iliac vein stenting after catheter-directed thrombolysis for acute iliofemoral thrombosis.经导管溶栓治疗急性髂股静脉血栓形成后髂静脉支架置入术失败的结果和预测因素。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2019 Mar;7(2):153-161. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2018.08.014. Epub 2019 Jan 16.
5
Long-term outcomes following use of a composite Wallstent-Z stent approach to iliofemoral venous stenting.使用复合 Wallstent-Z 支架方法进行髂股静脉支架置入术的长期结果。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2021 Mar;9(2):393-400.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2020.08.020. Epub 2020 Aug 20.
6
Effect of body mass index on initial presentation and outcomes after stenting for quality of life-impairing chronic iliofemoral venous obstruction.体质指数对生活质量受损的慢性髂股静脉阻塞支架置入术后初次表现和结局的影响。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2022 Mar;10(2):325-333.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2021.07.014. Epub 2021 Aug 4.
7
Midterm outcomes in postpartum women following endovenous treatment for acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis.产后女性行静脉内治疗急性髂股深静脉血栓形成的中期结果。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2020 Mar;8(2):167-173. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2019.10.023. Epub 2019 Dec 24.
8
Evaluation of anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapy after iliocaval stenting: Factors associated with stent occlusion.髂股静脉支架置入术后抗凝和抗血小板治疗的评估:与支架闭塞相关的因素。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2019 Jul;7(4):527-534. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2019.01.058.
9
Association between deep vein thrombosis and stent patency in symptomatic iliac vein compression syndrome: Systematic review and meta-analysis.症状性髂静脉压迫综合征中深静脉血栓形成与支架通畅性的关系:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2021 Jan;9(1):275-284. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2020.08.022. Epub 2020 Aug 20.
10
Factors Affecting Recurrent Deep Vein Thrombosis after Pharmacomechanical Thrombolysis and Left Iliac Vein Stent Placement in Patients with Iliac Vein Compression Syndrome.髂静脉压迫综合征患者药物机械溶栓及左髂静脉支架置入术后复发深静脉血栓的影响因素。
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2020 Apr;31(4):635-643. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2019.12.807. Epub 2020 Feb 29.