Kriegisch N, Reeves S E, Flukes E B, Johnson C R, Ling S D
Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, 20 Castray Esplanade, Battery Point, TAS, 7004, Australia.
Oecologia. 2019 Jul;190(3):665-677. doi: 10.1007/s00442-019-04445-6. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
Sea urchins have the capacity to destructively overgraze kelp beds and cause a wholesale shift to an alternative and stable 'urchin barren' reef state. However, destructive grazing appears labile and contingent on behavioural shift. Changes in supply of allochthonous 'drift-kelp' food are hypothesised as a trigger of change in urchin grazing behaviour, yet field tests are lacking. Here we conduct a suite of in situ behavioural surveys and manipulative experiments within kelp beds and on urchin barrens to examine foraging movements and evidence for a behavioural switch to an 'overgrazing mode' by the Australian urchin Heliocidaris erythrogramma (Echinometridae). Tracking urchins using time-lapse photography revealed urchin foraging to conform to a random walk model within kelp beds and on barrens. However, many individuals tended towards local movement within proximal crevices and movement was reduced in kelp beds compared to barrens. Directional movement of urchins toward newly available kelp was experimentally inducible, consistent with locally observed 'mobile-feeding-fronts' that develop at barrens-kelp interfaces. Habitat-specific feeding modes were also evidenced by herbivory assays which revealed urchin grazing rates to be high on both drift-kelp and standing kelp on barren grounds, while drift-kelp but not standing kelp was consumed at high rates within kelp beds. Time-lapse tracking of urchin foraging before/after addition of drift-kelp revealed a reduction in foraging across the reef surface after drift-kelp capture. Collectively, results indicate that the availability of drift-kelp is a pivotal trigger in determining urchin feeding modes which thus mediates the shift between alternative stable states for rocky reef ecosystems.
海胆有能力过度啃食海带床,导致其遭到破坏,并使整个生态系统彻底转变为另一种稳定的“海胆荒漠”礁石状态。然而,这种破坏性的啃食行为似乎并不稳定,且取决于行为的转变。有一种假设认为,外来“漂流海带”食物供应的变化是海胆啃食行为改变的触发因素,但缺乏实地测试。在此,我们在海带床和海胆荒漠中进行了一系列原位行为调查和操纵实验,以研究澳大利亚海胆红斑海胆(Echinometridae科)的觅食活动,以及其行为转变为“过度啃食模式”的证据。通过延时摄影追踪海胆发现,海胆在海带床和荒漠中的觅食行为符合随机游走模型。然而,许多个体倾向于在附近的裂缝内局部移动,与荒漠相比,海带床中的移动减少。实验表明,海胆会向新出现的海带定向移动,这与在荒漠 - 海带界面观察到的局部“移动觅食前沿”一致。食草性分析也证明了特定栖息地的觅食模式,该分析显示,在荒漠区域,海胆对漂流海带和直立海带的啃食率都很高,而在海带床中,海胆对漂流海带的啃食率很高,但对直立海带的啃食率不高。在添加漂流海带前后对海胆觅食进行延时追踪发现,捕获漂流海带后,整个礁石表面的觅食活动减少。总体而言,结果表明,漂流海带的可获得性是决定海胆觅食模式的关键触发因素,从而介导了岩礁生态系统不同稳定状态之间的转变。